Traded Adam Treloar [traded with #26, #33 and #42 to Bulldogs for #14 and 2021 R2]

Who won this trade?

  • Collingwood

    Votes: 1 6.3%
  • Western Bulldogs

    Votes: 15 93.8%

  • Total voters
    16

Remove this Banner Ad

27 - Played played 17 plus games every year of his career until this shortened season - Wouldn't have to pay the entire salary.

Wow you got just about everything wrong.
You single out like two things and say everything is wrong. Confirmation bias much?
He turns 28 before the start of next season so you can safely round his age up to 28.

Again, if Hawthorn sign him, by all means celebrate. We all know how big of a success some of your other older acquisitions have been lately...
 
Opposition supporters: “Hawthorn are no longer a destination club!”

Adam Treloar: “Hold my beer”

:drunk:
 
Opposition supporters: “Hawthorn are no longer a destination club!”

Adam Treloar: “Hold my beer”

:drunk:
Didnt realise he had made his decisions

On SM-N960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You single out like two things and say everything is wrong. Confirmation bias much?
He turns 28 before the start of next season so you can safely round his age up to 28.

Again, if Hawthorn sign him, by all means celebrate. We all know how big of a success some of your other older acquisitions have been lately...
So he turns 28 next year making him... 27.

You say he is injury prone, he consistently plays the majority if not the entire season.

You say we will be paying him a salary that we most likely won't be paying all of (if he comes)

You then compare him to Scully who was coming off an incredibly bad and serious injury.

Okay champ
 
Opposition supporters: “Hawthorn are no longer a destination club!”

Adam Treloar: “Hold my beer”

:drunk:
Might be going a little early on that one :oops:
 
Opposition supporters: “Hawthorn are no longer a destination club!”

Adam Treloar: “Hold my beer”

:drunk:

Haha more to do with other teams not wanting him, especially on that money, perhaps?
 
So he turns 28 next year making him... 27.

You say he is injury prone, he consistently plays the majority if not the entire season.

You say we will be paying him a salary that we most likely won't be paying all of (if he comes)

You then compare him to Scully who was coming off an incredibly bad and serious injury.

Okay champ
28 for Hawthorn if he goes there.

He is also a very similar type of player to Scully, who wasn't considered an injury prone player prior to 2018.

I don't know why you're so upset, I'm just saying I personally wouldn't do it. You've now gone from saying "it's ok, we're front loadong?!" To "w-well, we probably won't have to pay all of his contract!", which tells me you're running out of arguments.
 
28 for Hawthorn if he goes there.

He is also a very similar type of player to Scully, who wasn't considered an injury prone player prior to 2018.

I don't know why you're so upset, I'm just saying I personally wouldn't do it. You've now gone from saying "it's ok, we're front loadong?!" To "w-well, we probably won't have to pay all of his contract!", which tells me you're running out of arguments.
No my argument of us not paying it all is because you brought up his total salary, which is irrelevant if we won't be paying it all.

We would also almost certainly front load it as we have a ton of cap space available.

Scully came off a very very serious injury, we all knew that. Everyone did. Treloar is not in the same boat and they are not at all comparable. They are not even all that similar players either.

By the way not upset, just disagree.
 
28 for Hawthorn if he goes there.

He is also a very similar type of player to Scully, who wasn't considered an injury prone player prior to 2018.

I don't know why you're so upset, I'm just saying I personally wouldn't do it. You've now gone from saying "it's ok, we're front loadong?!" To "w-well, we probably won't have to pay all of his contract!", which tells me you're running out of arguments.
Hes injury prone because he's a similiar player to x player that has a freak injury, therefore injury prone.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

His partner is only in Qld for an 11 month contract, and so why would Treloar want a long term deal there?
It’s not like the QLD government will March her back to Victoria once her contract expired. Also not saying he wants to go there just that if he’s at all interested they should be 100% trying to get him across the line.
 
"Front loading" the contract of an injury-prone 28 year old who's already on 800k a year, from a club that just finished bottom 4 with the oldest list in the league...

Heard it all now.

why??? Isn’t the rule for clubs is that they have to spend 95% of their cap and the unused 5% can roll over to next year. Correct me if incorrect.

Hawks have a ton of space with the retirements and reality is who can we front load to match the 95%. Sicily gotta wait and see post ACL and Gunston & Breust are getting on that you wouldn’t be signing them up to 4 year deals. And no chance I want Mitchell & JOM being extended untill they actually get back to. A grade form.

Reality is if we don’t spend the cap it’s wasted and unused. Now as a fan I don’t want to give the pies 2 2nds for Treloar wound rather a 2nd and maybe a 3rd but the strategy is ok, only problem is why would Treloar want to come to another rebuilding side ?? Pies have missed the window but are closer than us.
 
I am wondering whether you have actually watched either player. Their only similarity is that they run fast. They play completely different roles.
Sounds like you're the one who doesn't watch either of them, which tells me you don't know much about football.
Both of them are endurance runners. They can keep running and running all game, even in 4th quarters. This kind of playstyle can potentially take a toll on a player's body. Obviously not all the time, but hey, I wouldn't take the chance, considering the cost and length of the contact.
 
Do people still not understand why Collingwood want to get rid of Treloar?

He won't be going anywhere unless he's getting the same big money contract that expires all the way in 2025. It's no surprise Clarko is keen.
Yes. But they will be paying some of that wage unless they take less in a trade IMO.
 
Sounds like you're the one who doesn't watch either of them, which tells me you don't know much about football.
Both of them are endurance runners. They can keep running and running all game, even in 4th quarters. This kind of playstyle can potentially take a toll on a player's body. Obviously not all the time, but hey, I wouldn't take the chance, considering the cost and length of the contact.
Any type of play style can potentially take a toll on the body though. Inside mids, key forwards, rucks all probably have it worse tbh so don't know why you're singling out the play style of an outside runner.

Wonder if you're wanting the crows to match the Saints offer for Crouch.
 
Sounds like you're the one who doesn't watch either of them, which tells me you don't know much about football.
Both of them are endurance runners. They can keep running and running all game, even in 4th quarters. This kind of playstyle can potentially take a toll on a player's body. Obviously not all the time, but hey, I wouldn't take the chance, considering the cost and length of the contact.

Looks like your mob is stuck with crouch for 650 a year over 4 years who turns 27 next year. At least treloar gets on the park regularly.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Adam Treloar [traded with #26, #33 and #42 to Bulldogs for #14 and 2021 R2]

Back
Top