It would have beeen SO much better if they'd made the G's capacity a bit over 100,000, so they could top the magical figure for the Granny every year, instead of it being 97, 98000.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It would have beeen SO much better if they'd made the G's capacity a bit over 100,000, so they could top the magical figure for the Granny every year, instead of it being 97, 98000.
The capacity is 100,000, but thats 98,000 seats and 2,000 standing room, apparently.
Last year some guy from the MCG said they would not sell all the standing room tickets as it would be too crowded for the other patrons
They should've added a couple of thousand more seats.....who cares about it being an even 100k, make it 102, 103k.
So instead they replaced it with a 'boutique' stadium with a third of that capacity.
In fairness to the AFL, how many games a year are realistically going to outdraw the 'boutique' stadiums in every given year?
A 160,000 capacity stadium would be ridiculous
What they should have done is replace Waverley with a stadium of equal capacity, ie. 75-80,000.
Would it be logistically possible, given the location of Docklands, the traffic congestion and the fact that it’s got a roof?
I personally couldn’t see the Victorian Government passing a proposal that would have seen potentially an extra 20-30,000 more people using transport too and from the games.
That's why engineers get paid the big bucks....
Just goes to show how great this sport is and how much we love it
Best bloody sport in the world.
So instead they replaced it with a 'boutique' stadium with a third of that capacity.
SOSBenny - Im stunned by people like more and more everyday. Every code, be it AFL, NFL, soccer, baseball seems to think that they would have success if they pushed their game in particular markets. What you said was wrong mate, sorry. AFL would be a nothing in the States. Soccer, with 300 million registered players in the world, has ALOT of trouble breaking into a country where football/baseball is so heavily imprinted into the psyche...basketball a tad behind.
I dont believe the AFL could ever have a professional Aussie Rules league in the states - and I mean professional. Is it surprising that people who think their preferred code is the best...are incidentally born where the code is dominant?
The real question you should be asking is, imagine if people grew up with Aussie Rules. You cant have someone grow up on NFL...then show them Aussie Rules, and expect them to dedicate their team and support to it. You might get 1 or 2 odd ones, but the majority will stick with what they know and love.
While I dont think the AFL has much international potential, as good a sport as it is, I also wonder what the global sproting landscape would look like if everyone around the world grew up on the same set of sports.
Also, if you have personal experience with the sport, as in having played it for example at an early age...that also is a key factor in what success a league may garner, which is why participation rates are so carefully watched - apart from ofcourse finding talent to fill up a league.
I think Ive missed something, but Ill leave it there.
I like the cut of your jibe, MVFC_NMFC
I've had to refrain from preaching the virtues of aussie rules to Poms in the last few weeks, as my excitement during September boils over. I just tell them they don't know what they're missing out on and leave it at that. The perception over here is that aussie rules is utterly violent - "an organised brawl" as 1 of my football ("soccer") team mates said to me last week.
I'm convinced that aussie rules will sadly NEVER penetrate the English market... nor any other foreign market I dsaresay. As you say, the national psyche is too deeply imprinted with the code they're raised on. Aussie rules finals don't even get a run ahead of NRL finals on Setanta sports here.
I dont believe the AFL could ever have a professional Aussie Rules league in the states - and I mean professional.
In my mind, concentrating on Australia is what AFL should continue to do, and not to look past that.
Yeah true spot on with most of that, and like I said its not entirely impossible, the only thing that people would have to remember is you cant have overnight success, and too many people are quick to put down something which doesnt capture the hearts and minds of everyone so quickly. Look at the Swans, its taken them a long long time to garner up support in Sydney in a market where League is number 1, to average solid crowds. Not to mention the AFL itself, its had a long time to average 37k, and it wasnt always like that. Persistance and time are the two main things that would go a long way into making a US league possible.
Not only that, but English Premier League average attendance any given year can have a difference of 3,000. The reason is for example last year, which is the latest data, had Watford and Charlton. Watfords ground is tiny, and Charltons is about 20k odd. Now that they are relegated, you have Sunderland and Derby...thats a 50k stadium, and Derbys is 35,000 I think, and Birminghams is pretty big aswell. So a dramatic change.