Recruiting AFL Draft Watch 2022 - Tsatas, Hayes, Davey x2, Munkara & Montgomerie

[eDPS]

Quick links: Player Contract Status | Trade & Free Agency 2022 | JHA Father/Son and NGA | Adrian Dodoro

Spoiler: LIVE DRAFT ORDER (2022 Draft Order)

Spoiler: FUTURE PICK TRACKER (2023 Draft Order)

Spoiler: Value to match

2022 Draft Guide AFL

Get the 2022 AFL Draft Guide Fill out your details below to access the Draft Guide Please Note: If you have previously completed the above form, lost access to the draft guide and would like to view it again please check your email for a direct link. Features Each profile includes vitals...

central.rookieme.com

 

[Booplaz]

If Saints are desperate for Mackenzie, hawks are the team they need to talk to, not bombers. Every draft board has hawks picking Cam. Maybe hawks will agree to 9+28+f1 for 6+24, seems fair.

So bombers will have to offer better deal for Saints to jump that far ahead.

Or Essendon could just indicate they’ll take Mackenzie rendering Hawthorn useless. No better offer necessary.

 

[hawkinoz]

Or Essendon could just indicate they’ll take Mackenzie rendering Hawthorn useless. No better offer necessary.

then Saints take the next best available which is likely to be Humphrey or Tsatas

 

[TheFrenchCut]

If Saints are desperate for Mackenzie, hawks are the team they need to talk to, not bombers. Every draft board has hawks picking Cam. Maybe hawks will agree to 9+28+f1 for 6+24, seems fair.

So bombers will have to offer better deal for Saints to jump that far ahead.

Thanks man, I'll let Ross know

 

[Keystone agony]

then Saints take the next best available which is likely to be Humphrey or Tsatas

Id prefer to give up 9 and F1 for pick 4 than pick 6

 

[Keystone agony]

Pick 4 and 22 for Dogs 11, F1, F1 (Tied Brisbane) ?

Who says no

 

[Happyskeret]

 

[Keystone agony]

so would Dodoro.

I mean everyone would incl saints 4 > 6

 

[Booplaz]

then Saints take the next best available which is likely to be Humphrey or Tsatas

Point is they wouldn’t trade up if the player they want is not going to be available.

 

[doug85]

then Saints take the next best available which is likely to be Humphrey or Tsatas

Your thoughts have no value. Please go away

 

[Wahooti Fandango]

Your thoughts have no value. Please go away

 

[andleanback]

MacKenzie or Hollands

9 a tad high for Hollands imo
Although we could play the long game and hopefully get Elijah back in a couple of years.

 

[eth-dog]

9 a tad high for Hollands imo
Although we could play the long game and hopefully get Elijah back in a couple of years.

I'd estimate that one of Ginbey, Phillipou or McKenzie would be available either way.

In a perfect world we can trade up to a pick to take Hollands in the teens

 

[mIKe9441]

Hawks seem to like Tsatas so we should look at swapping first round picks with them. Also our 22 (which would most likely get used for Davey), for their future 2nd which could be top 20.

We would be able to take Phillipou a bit later, while potentially securing a top 20 pick in next year's strong draft.

 

[ant555]

I do think he will be a better version of Langers. I’m bit more the other way I think we have enough on the outside would rather another one at the coal face. I think they will probably go Tsatas if Wardlaw is not available anyway. I won’t be dissatisfied though if that happens. I will be content that we arguably got the best inside and outside mid in two drafts if that happens. Won’t be upset if we pick Phillipou too just not my preference.

Do we have enough outside ? real outside ?
Shiel and Parish are consistently in the top 20 clearance players and Hobbs will play in the style of Neale.
Personally I am not locked into anyone. There are five players we could take and they would fill a need we have.

 

[Happyskeret]

Do we have enough outside ? real outside ?
Shiel and Parish are consistently in the top 20 clearance players and Hobbs will play in the style of Neale.
Personally I am not locked into anyone. There are five players we could take and they would fill a need we have.

I mean we can improve in most areas of the ground that’s why we finished 14. I don’t mind a bit of depth as well as we do tend to get a lot of injuries each year. Hopefully Setters will add some depth to it too. That North game sticks in my head where we absolutely got creamed in the middle.

 

[ghostdog]

We've nominated Munkara.

This doesn't change our draft situation though, does it? What's the point of this 'nomination'?

 

[ant555]

This doesn't change our draft situation though, does it? What's the point of this 'nomination'?

You have to nominate to match the bids after 40 .

 

[Zach Package]

This doesn't change our draft situation though, does it? What's the point of this 'nomination'?

Not only does it mean we have match rights after 40, it means he automatically goes onto our rookie list if he makes it through the main draft.

The alternative is what Adelaide have done with Keeler which is basically wash their hands of him and say ‘no thanks’

 

[eth-dog]

Not only does it mean we have match rights after 40, it means he automatically goes onto our rookie list if he makes it through the main draft.

The alternative is what Adelaide have done with Keeler which is basically wash their hands of him and say ‘no thanks’

Yeah, plus Keeler is no chance of lasting that long anyway

 

[GUMBLETRON]

Yeah, plus Keeler is no chance of lasting that long anyway

Similar was said of Owens last year. It's a strange choice - unless they're certain they'll have no picks after 40.

 

[eth-dog]

Similar was said of Owens last year. It's a strange choice - unless they're certain they'll have no picks after 40.

Owens was always seen as late teens to early 20's. Keeler is firmly seen in the 20's.

 

[TheGrizz]

Similar was said of Owens last year. It's a strange choice - unless they're certain they'll have no picks after 40.

They have nominated Michalanney as a father-son, who will likely chew up most of their picks.

 

[Zach Package]

Similar was said of Owens last year. It's a strange choice - unless they're certain they'll have no picks after 40.

The only real reason not to do it is that they flat out don’t want him

 

[faible]

We've nominated Munkara.

Was a no-brainer to nominate him, now have to hope he slides down the order and with an influx of Indigenous kids coming in to the club we can provide a good environment to get the best out of his clear talent.

 

[faible]

He is different to Langford.
Langford struggles with the positioning and where to be as a midfielder and makes slow decisions . His strength is up and down a wing or half forward. Phillipou does not struggle around the ground and is a pretty good link player. He is just not an A grade clearance winner although he does win his share.
If we are going forward with Shiel and Parish then a dominant clearance player is not really the number one need. Even more so with Hobbs being in the picture. What we need is strong hard edge competitors that can play their role and lead. He is right at the pointy end of my list.

What current player would you say Phillipou ends up like?