- May 3, 2007
- 3,132
- 293
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Coburg
Or having 3 carlton mids (stevens, judd, gibbs, murphy, scotland, carrazo)
Or 3 hawks backs (birchall, guerra, ellis)
exc.
You sure you don't mean etc.?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Or having 3 carlton mids (stevens, judd, gibbs, murphy, scotland, carrazo)
Or 3 hawks backs (birchall, guerra, ellis)
exc.
Lol here we go again. Reading the thread last year you said the exact same thing and ended up saying to the extent 'oh some decent picks but nothing special.'Even still, T.Cloke is a "SPUD".
Post your team.
I have to head out right now but when i get back later on tonight at around 10-11pm i will rip your team to shreds.
Havent heard that line before.Even still, T.Cloke is a "SPUD".
Post your team.
I have to head out right now but when i get back later on tonight at around 10-11pm i will rip your team to shreds.
Highly modest of you, but you do. It just shows how crap the board has become since the days of 2005. Not hard to look half decent with posters like powaflag08 leading the post count.
bones25 is the only guy who slightly knows what hes talking about. Its a shame really.
What about Andrew44333 or Pie Legend or Harro or Me ?
Havent heard that line before.
61st mate. Good luck.
If we really want to work out who the gun DTer is and who the shit DTer is maybe we should post our DT results from years gone past? Or would that be too embarassing for you?
Stanton will not average more than last year?
I will hold you to that.
Man, you have NO IDEA.
Anyway, moving on, 3 Essendon midfielders makes no difference.
It should not matter in this game.
It is not about making your team look colourful.
I guess having S.Mitchell, L.Hodge and T.Tuck is stupid too?
3 of the same team my ass.
Haha.
Please, PLEASE tell me you are pulling my leg?
Not 1 "thing" you just said had any credibility to it.
M.Kreuzer > S.Hampson.
Guaranteed to get every opportunity to play game this year compared to S.Hampson who is the best ruckmen at Carlton but has a few fighting for his spot.
J.Meesen will at least play this year and give my team some sort of depth during the middle and later stages of a year.
A 72k rookie will give you nothing.
A "golden rule".
Never pick a reserve player who will NEVER PLAY.
R.O'Keefe is an 80 point player.
A mid-range who should not really be upgraded because he is serviceable.
No point getting those players in your team.
Get the best of the best (Chapman, Johnson, etc).
W.Tredrea is a shocking pick.
That just tops off your stupidity.
Oh sorry, saying C.Cloke is a better option tops it off.
Clueless moron.
Yeah I apoligise. Almost forgot that theone5 is the joke of the boardPlease doon't stir him as the next 5-10 pages will be filled with his pointless ramblings.
Here's a guy who knows what he's talking about.Humorous stuff...you actually think you know what you are talking about dont you?
3 players from the same team in the same position IS a problem. There is a lower chance that all 3 will fire on the same day. Simple.
Kreuzer > Hampson? Are you for real? For one Hampson WILL play every game for the rest of the season (barring injury). Kreuzer when he actually gets on the park will not get near Hampson's scores...he also is not guaranteed a spot in the team for the rest of the season. If he's not up to it he'll be straight back into the VFL. I think I'd fork out the extra 7k to get Hampson (as would anyone else with a clue, ie. not you).
Tredrea? Fallen superstar.. I'd rather any of Burton, Didak, Hall and Porplyzia (may be forgetting someone).
T. Cloke a spud? My god
Whelan? You idiot.
3 players from the same team in the same position IS a problem. There is a lower chance that all 3 will fire on the same day. Simple.
For those who have Adam Goodes, he will miss 1 week due to suspension.
Havent heard that line before.
61st mate. Good luck.
If we really want to work out who the gun DTer is and who the shit DTer is maybe we should post our DT results from years gone past? Or would that be too embarassing for you?
The point I was referring to is more about the team, not the concept. Having Hodge-Tuck-Mitchell is fine IMO. I just dont think having Houli and Dyson is worth it as they both arent likely to average 80-85+(Which you're looking for IMO). If you have both + 1 rookie + Stevens you only leave 2 spots for elite players. It also means you gotta upgrade Houli, Dyson AND the rookie.Its all about averages tho, who cares if
a gets 40,120,80
b gets 120, 80,40
c gets 80,40, 120
relative of course to whether said players perform, but if they all average well and were good value its not a problem.
David Villa. Would have liked Priddis + Pfieffer IN instead of Houli and Ellis but meltdown changed that.Which of the two is yours? While everyone is comparing, my team is sitting 28th. There's a few there but mines the Geelong inspired name.
Love it.
The best team i have seen posted here.
Did you learn a thing or two from me last year mate?
From the looks of that side you did.
And let me guess, you have used 2-3 trades already?
David Villa. Would have liked Priddis + Pfieffer IN instead of Houli and Ellis but meltdown changed that.
Houli will be fine to average 75+ anyway.
Rate a Cash Cow!
Travis Tuck
Rate a Cash Cow!
Travis Tuck
Rate a Cash Cow!
Travis Tuck
I'm in the same situation with Simon Buckley, i expected an average 70-75 but after struggling this week with only 66% gametime im more inclined to trade down to Geary who has played 97% and 90% in his to games, and gettign 90k in the bank, then upgrading Tuck when he raises to 200-250k