80 is the difference between the averages.before u were saying 80 now u r saying 60. Sorry i called u an idiot.
60 is the difference between points earned.
And thanks for the apology.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
80 is the difference between the averages.before u were saying 80 now u r saying 60. Sorry i called u an idiot.
did u read what the guy wrote? Cox is averaging 60 more than wood. (well according to him). Instead of getting cox he got a gun mid instead of a two year player. That gun is averaging fifty more than the two year player he was about to get. So Cox would of got him 10 points more each week. Their have been two weeks 10 + 10 = 20. Next time read and understand before posting
Weekly ranking of 51.
Pretty happy with that considering I could have done much better.
the moral of the story is Cox is a freak and will beat Bartels average of last year.
No Kennely has it.Anyone considering Craig Bolton? Has posted some great scores over the last two weeks, and 8 scores over 80 last year. Also is captain and will therefore want to perform well. Anyone thinking he could pick up Malceski's job?
Currently 61st even with a squad I'm unhappy with.
Pfft, no he wont.
Bartel will again be #1 this year.
Currently 61st even with a squad I'm unhappy with.
Pfft, no he wont.
Bartel will again be #1 this year.
Currently 61st even with a squad I'm unhappy with.
Pfft, no he wont.
Bartel will again be #1 this year.
Currently 61st even with a squad I'm unhappy with.
No Kennely has it.
No Kennely has it.
no mattner has it
I may take the punt on J.Kelly for H.Scottland but have noone else to really trade so it might be Hodge for Scottland.Should i hold him for 1 more week?
Mattner had it this week because Kennely was getting tagged by K.Cornes that won't happen agian.no mattner has it
I may take the punt on J.Kelly for H.Scottland but have noone else to really trade so it might be Hodge for Scottland.Should i hold him for 1 more week?
Mattner had it this week because Kennely was getting tagged by K.Cornes that won't happen agian.
Kennely will play Malcheski's role all year unless teams decide to tag him (which didn't work anyway).
Mattner won't take the role all year though. It is more likely that it will be Kennely and C.Bolton than Kennely and Mattner.malceski and kennelly both played as runners last year. Now that malceski is injured, Mattner is taking the role. Kennelly is still a runner if malceski is in or out of the team
You are trading out Scotland i assume?
i have him and will perservere for a while yet
He is going to drop in cash, but there is no point dropping a gun after 2 weeks, especially for another gun who might only avg 10 more points a game.
Save a trade, unless you drop him for a performing rookie who's value will skyrocket and use the money to upgrade a mid range player from another position to a gun. Thats the only way i would consider it, and even thats a bit iffy.
IMO you should only drop proven GUNS after 5 or 6 weeks of average games at a minimum
Mattner won't take the role all year though. It is more likely that it will be Kennely and C.Bolton than Kennely and Mattner.