News AFL trade, free agency and draft. "who goes where?" - No freakin' hypotheticals

[muldercs]

Glad its done with no more player losses..
O'Meara is a beauty if that knee holds up.
Go Hawks..

 

[Flag08]

Rohan Connelly tweet :
"By my count 9 former @GWSGIANTS players now on carltonfc list? That has to be a record, surely? #DeadlineDay."

I've said it before but how is Carlton ever going to beat the Giants stars with the Giants discards? SOS can't let his babies go. He did fail Form 5 twice so he's no genius.

The Hawks on the other hand, in JOM, TOM and the Ryan, have top shelf guns for the next 10 years. Add a couple more next year and we are in business again.

 

[Prudster]

Is this one of the new rules?

Nope, i'm pretty sure it was always the rule when they brought in that bidding process.

 

[HomerJayS]

We will upgrade a couple of our rookies with those late picks, so maybe only 1 more new senior player coming from outside the club?

 

[bradburygold]

• If a Nominating Club does not have enough points to secure a F/S or Academy selection in a given Draft, the points required will carry over to the Club’s first selection the following year.
In this case, points will be deducted prior to the trade period to ensure the Nominating Club pays it points debt, rather than trades picks away.

EDIT
so our 2nd round pick (our first selection) will slide back to make up any equivelant draft points we have in negative balance.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL Tenant/AFL/Files/Father-son-bidding-system.pdf

 

[Flag08]

I'm convinced West Coast and Melbourne owe us a favour as well.

Yeah, but the Tigers owe us one.

 

[Furn2]

They ended top getting about what we offered on day 1 and gave to the Saints.

This was its about making JOM suffer i believe.

Getting 10 was vital in having the ND as back up.

Luckily Jom held his nerve too. Good signs.

 

[Hodginator]

 

[The Lemon]

19s


PICK SWAP BETWEEN SYDNEY AND PORT ADELAIDE Swans get: Pick 9, 19, 49 Power get: Pick 14, 17, 31

 

[Furn2]

• If a Nominating Club does not have enough points to secure a F/S or Academy selection in a given Draft, the points required will carry over to the Club’s first selection the following year.
In this case, points will be deducted prior to the trade period to ensure the Nominaing Club pays it points debt, rather than trades picks away.
Clubs will not be eligible to participate in the bidding system if they still owe points going into the next draft.

SO..if jarman is nominated before 88, then: SUCK IT SAINTS OUR 1ST PICK NEXT YEAR JUST GOT A WHOLE LET LESS VALUABLE

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL Tenant/AFL/Files/Father-son-bidding-system.pdf

Its will come off our 2nd not the saints pick.

Remember tho the discount is set at pick 18, so about 200 points for any bids after 18 so if he's bid in at like 55 or later he'll be 0 points anyway.

 

[flinchfree]

Do we really need him?

Yes, yes we do.

 

[twentythree23]

SUFFER IN YA JOCKS YA DICKHEAD !!!!

 

[Hoogmeister]

• If a Nominating Club does not have enough points to secure a F/S or Academy selection in a given Draft, the points required will carry over to the Club’s first selection the following year.
In this case, points will be deducted prior to the trade period to ensure the Nominating Club pays it points debt, rather than trades picks away.

SO..if jarman is nominated before 88, then: SUCK IT SAINTS OUR 1ST PICK NEXT YEAR JUST GOT A WHOLE LET LESS VALUABLE

If that is the case, then it seems a bit broken. Surely it applies to the first pick usable by Hawthorn.

 

[A Cut Above]

If you can land 2 best 22 players every year youre doing ok, thats what we've achieved with JOM and Mitchell.

It could be a risk worth taking, although the price for O'Meara was exceedingly steep. He'll be under huge pressure to perform.

 

[Spanish Sahara]

HODGEYROAD Its ok now mate

 

[The Lemon]

Graham Wright still won't smack that ****ing Cocksnot. Good man

 

[TazHawk15]

As I have been saying for weeks our bloke is not named Graham Wrong.

But **** you Tony Cockstain.

 

[bradburygold]

If that is the case, then it seems a bit broken. Surely it applies to the first pick usable by Hawthorn.

depends what "first selection means" I guess.

 

[OzJohnnie]

Graham Wright still won't smack that ******* Cocksnot. Good man

Yes. Oozing professionalism. Very impressive, Hawthorn.

 

[Prudster]

Do we really need him?

That's for our recruiting staff to determine. The point is that we have the option to take him, should he nominate us.

 

[LuckyHawk]

Yeah, but the Tigers owe us one.

The Tiges do us the annual favour by playing crap football.

 

[The Lemon]

Yes. Oozing professionalism. Very impressive, Hawthorn.

Will Mr Dickface speak after this?

 

[Hoogmeister]

The Tiges do us the annual favour by playing crap football.

They also seem to beat us every year.

 

[Pessimistic]

If that is the case, then it seems a bit broken. Surely it applies to the first pick usable by Hawthorn.

Not if you trade it first, then unforseen requests make you bump it up.

Was the whole thing a set up?

 

[OzJohnnie]

In interesting point to note. Apparently, Carlton needed a lot of bottom of the table picks to enable some draft day maneuvers they have planned. The chicken feed was more important than the chicken to them. It's always important to remember that any individual draft pick is virtually worthless. It all depends on what you want to do with that pick that gives it value. The draft calculator is irrelevant to a trade strategy. It's only useful when you have no plan for your picks. I bet GCS were hitting the calculator refresh button like a hen pecking at seeds.