Rugbyrobby
Debutant
Players wouldnt be happy if a clWhat's the legality of these contracts and can they be enforced??
Pub chat today raised the question about the young Monty lad that signed with LP only to change his mind. Now from what was said LP, whilst disappointed will not try and enforce his signature and cut their losses.
My question is, could they? You hear some trying to hold players to a contract but legally, can they?
I remember years ago big Mick Gay sat out a season, I am sure I was told it was a contract he had with Epping but did not want to play with them so signed at Heidelberg and sat out the last year on his Epping contract. Anyone confirm that is on the mark?
Read on here that there are possibly a few Macleod blokes wanting to leave to a Div3 side but have been told they would not be released.
I always thought these contacts where nothing legal and you can only really stop a bloke leaving if he owes money. You can question their character (which should be taken into question if your word is easily dismissed) but circumstances do change I suppose (and I am sure $$ fly's around)
Has there been other players held to contract? I their precedence of it?
Just curious, and no I am not signing a contract, in my day it was your word and that showed your character. My only contract is with the canteen and bar, I promise to use them.
so if a bloke signs a contract say in Nov then the club signs a couple of better players in say Feb the club is within it's right to tell the first player that he's not required the offer is rescinded and he can go anywhere and try to get a new offer?Contracts and Clearances both start with C but two different words. I was talking about contracts.
However, if he did take a sign on fee, I agree what would happen as he has always been with Mont and they could just register him for 24, shows contracts are not worth the paper they are written on I suppose.
If players can walk then why can't clubs rip up contracts at their discretion?