It’s a local football league. What an over reaction by the NFNL. Embarrassing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Couldn’t agree moreIt’s a local football league. What an over reaction by the NFNL. Embarrassing.
Just Ask is Stillman?
Yep, the Martin Stillman hour ........ with special guests the footy ops genius Jeff Downes & from memory lane the great Simon Devine.Couldn’t agree more
A bunch amateurs
Are they going to provide an alternative. ?
I’m just scrolling through their content and it’s literally harmless. Would love to hear the leagues thoughts on this.Yep, the Martin Stillman hour ........ with special guests the footy ops genius Steve Downes & from memory lane the great Simon Devine.
OK then slow deep breath and go.From the horses mouth.
For example to get the footy show down at the club for promotional activities over pre-season we require NFNL approval.
What a farkin joke & no wonder senior level club administrators are leaving in big numbers.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MEMO
TO: NFNL AFFILIATED CLUBS
CC: NFNL STAFF
FROM: MARTIN STILLMAN
SUBJECT: REVISED NFNL SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY
DATE: 16 OCTOBER 2024
Dear Affiliated Clubs,
Re: NFNL Social Media Policy
Policy Overview:
➢ At the NFNL Board of Directors meeting last night, the board endorsed the attached Social
Media Policy, inclusion section 4.
All NFNL-affiliated clubs are strictly prohibited from engaging with or supporting any media
platforms, including social media forums or pages, that have not been explicitly approved by the
NFNL. This applies to all forms of media, including but not limited to:
• Print media
• Online news outlets
• Social media platforms
• Podcasts, video blogs, or any other digital communication channels
Requirement for Written Approval:
Before any club can interact with non-NFNL-endorsed media outlets, they must seek and obtain
written approval from the NFNL. This written approval must come directly from the league’s
authorized representatives to ensure that all communications align with the league's values,
messaging, and strategic objectives. Failure to do so will result in clubs being subject to disciplinary
measures.
Potential Disciplinary Actions:
Any club found to be in violation of this policy - whether by directly engaging with non-endorsed
media outlets or by indirectly supporting them - may face significant consequences. Disciplinary
actions may include, but are not limited to:
• Financial penalties
• Suspension of club activities or privileges within the league
• Formal reprimands
• Possible disqualification from league events
Should you seek any further clarification please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours Sincerely,
Martin Stillman
Chief Executive Officer
Northern Football Netball League
Unfortunately you are 100% on the moneyOK then slow deep breath and go.
This is a really disappointing development the guys and gal's at the northern footy show are genuinely trying to support and help teams/clubs/supporters in the NFNL.
So the best thing that the league can think of is sic the legal team onto them, when that had little to no effect because club/supports actually liked feeling like someone cared about more than just the bottom line the leagues only response is to basically outlaw them.
Anybody that HAD their rose coloured glasses on still and tried to beleive the league has the clubs best interests in mind surely can start to see reality.
NFNL prior, current and future policies have and always will be,
WE ARE THE BOSS just ask us
YOU WILL DO AS YOU ARE TOLD or be fined
DONT DARE MAKE US LOOK INCOMPETENT we don't the need help
END RANT sorry
Have heard we could see some significant changes to the VFL and NFNL qualification rules
Minimum 5 games with 2 after 30 June.Have heard we could see some significant changes to the VFL and NFNL qualification rules
If they change the qualifying to 5 for VFL listed it needs to change for all players .Minimum 5 games with 2 after 30 June.
Should we not be encouraging the VFL players to play in the nfnl more often? They will simply go to another league. There are pros and cons on this. We seen many VFL players return for finals and help clubs win the flag that won't be there round 1 next season however their presence was great. What's fair?The NFNLare baning all VFL players from the league, unless they sign a particular release that incurs an additional fee made payable directly to the NFNL, in monthly instalments and franked quarterly, with a clause which states any player caught talking to anyone outside the NFNL about NFNL or non NFNL matters will be further sanctioned , with no avenue for appeal and all decisions of the NFNL final……
It’s what I heard anyhow….,based on recent events….
Exactly it’s great for the league … even more so when the VFL player is a 1 pointer … playing for his junior club that assisted in their football journey from the outset . The 3 games qualifier has been a rule for years …. Not sure why all of a sudden it’s an issue . Obviously some clubs are blaming this as a reason for lack of success in 2024Should we not be encouraging the VFL players to play in the nfnl more often? They will simply go to another league. There are pros and cons on this. We seen many VFL players return for finals and help clubs win the flag that won't be there round 1 next season however their presence was great. What's fair?
On Pixel 9 Pro Fold using BigFooty.com mobile app
It needs stricter qualify guidelines imo. Plenty of leagues have this already.Should we not be encouraging the VFL players to play in the nfnl more often? They will simply go to another league. There are pros and cons on this. We seen many VFL players return for finals and help clubs win the flag that won't be there round 1 next season however their presence was great. What's fair?
On Pixel 9 Pro Fold using BigFooty.com mobile app
Absolutely spot onExactly it’s great for the league … even more so when the VFL player is a 1 pointer … playing for his junior club that assisted in their football journey from the outset . The 3 games qualifier has been a rule for years …. Not sure why all of a sudden it’s an issue . Obviously some clubs are blaming this as a reason for lack of success in 2024
Why can’t senior players who’ve played 3 reserves games play in the reserves then?Absolutely spot on
Three games has always been the qualifier. Whether you’ve been injured, overseas or a pre 30th June recruit
Why would the rules be any different for a VFL player. Three games is three games
Because that’s not the rule ….Why can’t senior players who’ve played 3 reserves games play in the reserves then?
Whys that a rule..Because that’s not the rule ….
What's the other league's rules. You would think if it is governed by AFL Vic it should be the same? Maybe they are bringing it inline?It needs stricter qualify guidelines imo. Plenty of leagues have this already.
Should we not be encouraging the VFL players to play in the nfnl more often? They will simply go to another league. There are pros and cons on this. We seen many VFL players return for finals and help clubs win the flag that won't be there round 1 next season however their presence was great. What's fair?
On Pixel 9 Pro Fold using BigFooty.com mobile app
From an Ammo perspective.What's the other league's rules. You would think if it is governed by AFL Vic it should be the same? Maybe they are bringing it inline?
On Pixel 9 Pro Fold using BigFooty.com mobile app
Outer east for example you can’t have played over 12 gamesWhat's the other league's rules. You would think if it is governed by AFL Vic it should be the same? Maybe they are bringing it inline?
On Pixel 9 Pro Fold using BigFooty.com mobile app