Am I the only one who thinks the Dogs will get flogged?

[Scary_Foot_9]

This backfired so hard you could hear it from Jupiter.

 

[gimp!]

I think they will as well, but then again i thought that the last 3 weeks as well
Sydney premiership looks pretty safe i would of thought though.

Safe as houses! Lucky you didn't gamble the farm mate!! Or did you?

 

[blue harvest]

This backfired so hard you could hear it from Jupiter.

Uranus.

 

[Max Caddy]

Ruh roh!

 

[charcoalchicken]

Must say I am staggered at how many people seem to think the Dogs can win it. As a neutral, I just cant see them getting close.

I can't see them kicking anywhere near enough goals with Stringer so badly out of form.

I cannot see them being able to hold Buddy and Tippett.

The Swans midfield runs far deeper than the Dogs too.

What am I missing?

a lot, obviously

 

[NUFC Tiger]

Must say I am staggered at how many people seem to think the Dogs can win it. As a neutral, I just cant see them getting close.

I can't see them kicking anywhere near enough goals with Stringer so badly out of form.

I cannot see them being able to hold Buddy and Tippett.

The Swans midfield runs far deeper than the Dogs too.

What am I missing?

 

[footyfan1978]

This backfired so hard you could hear it from Jupiter.

I am calling bullshit.
Sound waves would not have arrived yet for anything to be heard.

 

[R_Grunter]

None of these soft pigs are coming back in here to say they were wrong

The bloke that started this thread is an absolute D. This isn't the first time he's stepped out, but every time he does he is an idiot.

 

[nylexbandit]

I agreed with OP - well played dogs!

 

[TheBont]

Beat Sydney twice before facing them today

Beat eagles over there after already traveling to Perth couple weeks before the game, beat the Hawks at the g, beat gws at spotless.
Yeah nah definetly could see them getting flogged today.
Honestly threads like this make me question how delusional some people are. You don't make a grand final being a crap team.

 

[Substance]

I think the worst call was the swans mid runs deeper than ours. Ours goes about 10 players deep and the 8-10th best mid does as good a job as the 2-3rd best mid.

 

[cosman123]

I admit I got it wrong.. But holy hell I didnt think the umpiring would be that atrocious..

 

[Charlie Bucket]

Just came to have a quick look, and a chuckle at you logging on big footy as the game finished as if you have nothing in your life except BF.

Get a life mate, I'm going out with my friends now while you celebrate that I got a tip wrong, I couldn't give a shit the dogs were enormous and are the most amazing premiers I've seen and yep I got it wrong.
You on the other hand are still a sizable Flog, good luck with your awesome night telling BF how you were right and make sure you don't stay up too late on the Internet, 'lil bitch

Hahahahaha how's your form, starting a thread about the dogs getting pumped and then when you're made to look like BF's biggest goose, you sook up.
Hahahaha the whole of BF is laughing at you You are the worlds worst judge. Hahahaha what a peanut

 

[zucchini]

C

The bloke that started this thread is an absolute D. This isn't the first time he's stepped out, but every time he does he is an idiot.

Classic thread.

 

[Yellow Feathers]

I hope people have learned something from this thread - do not buy into hype. This is twice now Sydney have gone into a grand final as favourites and twice they have been defeated.

 

[Astro_]

At the end of the day it's 1v7, Sydney will flog them.

Spot on brother

 

[demondavey]

Spot on brother

I was wrong. Enjoy the win.

 

[demondavey]

I hope people have learned something from this thread - do not buy into hype. This is twice now Sydney have gone into a grand final as favourites and twice they have been defeated.

Posers. I genuinely thought they'd learn from 2014, they have so many passengers.

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

I'd like to think the Dogs can win, however two things tell me they probably won't....

1: Swans will be very keen to redeem themselves from their last GF showing, and their midfield core will come out breathing fire.

2: Dogs looked to have played their GF last week with a very emotional post-game, and with zero GF experience I expect them to be well off the pace in the first quarter before they settle.

Swans were in it early, but couldn't stamp themselves on the game or scoreboard. Too many of their experienced players were disappointing over the course of the game.

Dogs rode the emotion the whole way through the finals, settled early and were the best team overall..

 

[Joey longshadow]

Must say I am staggered at how many people seem to think the Dogs can win it. As a neutral, I just cant see them getting close.

I can't see them kicking anywhere near enough goals with Stringer so badly out of form.

I cannot see them being able to hold Buddy and Tippett.

The Swans midfield runs far deeper than the Dogs too.

What am I missing?

What you missed is heart
The doggies dug very deep ,and we're harder for longer

 

[Plugger35]

I got it pretty spot on in my post earlier in the thread, I said it would be no more than 5 goals either way and if the Swans got on top which they did in the 2nd quarter the umpires would keep the Dogs in it.

I underestimated the bias of the umpires though, not only did they keep the Dogs in it, they made sure they would win.

Inb4 Dogs supporters call me salty, a free kick count of 20-8 in a close GF doesn't lie, I wish we got that sort of a leg up form the umpires in the 09/10 GFs.

Maybe you morons will STFU about being robbed in the 2009 prelim now when the free kick count was 17/17.

 

[Astro_]

I got it pretty spot on in my post earlier in the thread, I said it would be no more than 5 goals either way and if the Swans got on top which they did in the 2nd quarter the umpires would keep the Dogs in it.

I underestimated the bias of the umpires though, not only did they keep the Dogs in it, they made sure they would win.

Inb4 Dogs supporters call me salty, a free kick count of 20-8 in a close GF doesn't lie, I wish we got that sort of a leg up form the umpires in the 09/10 GFs.

Maybe you morons will STFU about being robbed in the 2009 prelim now when the free kick count was 17/17.

STFU

 

[Rockford18sx2]

I admit I got it wrong.. But holy hell I didnt think the umpiring would be that atrocious..

Mate you should quit will your behind. At least go down with some dignity. Might be a bit beyond a salty Adelaide fan though.

 

[Rockford18sx2]

I got it pretty spot on in my post earlier in the thread, I said it would be no more than 5 goals either way and if the Swans got on top which they did in the 2nd quarter the umpires would keep the Dogs in it.

I underestimated the bias of the umpires though, not only did they keep the Dogs in it, they made sure they would win.

Inb4 Dogs supporters call me salty, a free kick count of 20-8 in a close GF doesn't lie, I wish we got that sort of a leg up form the umpires in the 09/10 GFs.

Maybe you morons will STFU about being robbed in the 2009 prelim now when the free kick count was 17/17.

Told you so know it all flog right here.

 

[_Mike_]

I wish we got that sort of a leg up form the umpires in the 09/10 GFs

Meh... The Saints got it in the 66 GF... 39FF, 26FA..