Anthony Albanese - How long? -3-

Remove this Banner Ad

Australia would be:

One far left (Green), one left (Teal), one centre left (ALP), one centre right (LNP), one right (Token other conservative party that changes issue each election), one far right (Hanson)?
You forgot the National Party, it's perpetual opposition for the Libs without their 3% of vote.
 
They will have plenty to attack after the next election.
But finding a Teal to contest a suburban seat would be nigh on impossible. Where would they go to lunch?

Now you’re never gonna get us to vote for you if you continue to sneer at our ‘wealth’ while having one of the richest ever party leaders in Dutton.

Does he ‘lunch’?

Are you seeing how your disassociated campaigns make you look fractured?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is Labor really centre left ?

I think so, they have a lot of room to move further left and they've done a lot of favors for big business by keeping the demand base growing the last two years.

The crack in Albo's arse is certainly for sitting on the fence.

Not as much as McGowan's ALP party was, that's the closest thing to a centre right wing party as you'll see under an ALP flag.
 
You keep telling us your not a labor voter. Sounds like your trying to convince yourself.
This right here is the kind of nonsense that leads to people being mean to you.

Not because you're disagreeing on substance and providing good counter-points.

Just empty, schoolyard-level posting like this.

Grow up.
 
You forgot the National Party, it's perpetual opposition for the Libs without their 3% of vote.

That's the "N" in the LNP I mentioned. You raise an interesting point though, the ALP won with the lowest primary vote, was it ever?, and if that slips more - would a coalition with the greens be similarly needed?
 
I think so, they have a lot of room to move further left and they've done a lot of favors for big business by keeping the demand base growing the last two years.

The crack in Albo's arse is certainly for sitting on the fence.

Not as much as McGowan's ALP party was, that's the closest thing to a centre right wing party as you'll see under an ALP flag.
Hawke-Keating?
 
Is Labor really centre left ?

Not really, maybe in some token ways.

Neither major party is particularly 'progressive', Dutton is more your American style conservative, Turnbull probably should have been an ALP PM.

The socially progressive stuff the ALP does is generally stuff that's already well publicly supported, and they're not really running an economically progressive agenda IMO.

Greens are progressive, but not as radically so as the Murdoch media would have most believe. If you disconnected Greens policies from the Greens Party name, I suspect there's a significant amount of people who'd be onboard with a lot of it.

I suspect the opposite applies to LNP policies, where there's simply a lot of entrenched 'team' support but not a lot of actual specific support for their policies.
 
Yes, those too ignorant to understand the science.

‘They say the climate is warming so why is it raining outside’ :drunk:


Thanks BBC!

For every 1C rise in average temperature, the atmosphere can hold up to around 7% more moisture.

With more moisture available, rainfall can become heavier.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Not really, maybe in some token ways.

Neither major party is particularly 'progressive', Dutton is more your American style conservative, Turnbull probably should have been an ALP PM.

The socially progressive stuff the ALP does is generally stuff that's already well publicly supported, and they're not really running an economically progressive agenda IMO.

Greens are progressive, but not as radically so as the Murdoch media would have most believe. If you disconnected Greens policies from the Greens Party name, I suspect there's a significant amount of people who'd be onboard with a lot of it.

I suspect the opposite applies to LNP policies, where there's simply a lot of entrenched 'team' support but not a lot of actual specific support for their policies.
The most successful recent state ALP govts have been centre right economically, but quite progressive socially
 
Dutton has said he would cancel the visas of those responsible and deport them if not citizens. Albo needs to keep them on side for votes.
Nonsense. I have plenty to criticise Albanese about, but he has done a much better job of keeping both sides onside than Dutton, who just threw in his lot automatically with Israel.
 
Dutton has said he would cancel the visas of those responsible and deport them if not citizens.
Why do you think he would make a comment like that?

He doesn't know who they are yet, as he doesn't know if they're citizens or not.
So why would he make a comment like that, that would so heavily imply that the criminals are 'immigrants'... And if you're honest you'd admit you're thinking Arab.

Other than a dog whistle, why would Dutton bring visas into the discussion?


deport them if not citizens. Albo needs to keep them on side for votes.

Now be honest here.

1. Who is the "them" you are referring to?


2. Do you believe that 'left wing' parties 'import' 'illegal immigrants' for votes?
 
Australia would be:

One far left (Green), one left (Teal), one centre left (ALP), one centre right (LNP), one right (Token other conservative party that changes issue each election), one far right (Hanson)?
No, Australia would be one centre-right (Coalition, though the current leader flirts with the radical right) and one centre (Labor). No other party has a significant number of lower house seats, which is the criteria I was using. The Greens' four seats doesn't make them a major player. And calling them far left is silly, they don't want to end capitalism or change the entire system of government like Melenchon does.
 
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong? Not a single one of them is as you describe.

France - 3 majors (centre, radical right, radical left)

Italy - 5 (2 radical right, centre-right, centre-left, populist)

Netherlands - 4 (radical right, centre-right, Christian democrat, centre-left/green)

Belgium - 11 (2 radical right, 2 Christian democrat, 2 centre-right, 2 centre-left, 2 green, radical left)

Switzerland - 6 (radical right, centre-right, centre, centre-left, 2 green)

Norway - 4 (radical right, centre-right, centre, centre-left)

Sweden - 3 (radical right, centre-right, centre-left)

Ireland - 3 (2 centre-right, centre-left)

Perhaps don't speak so confidently about things you know little about.
The fact is they still need to form Coalitions to get power. Which mean the minor parties in any coalition have to bend to the will of the majority partner.

What defines radical-right btw?
 
No, Australia would be one centre-right (Coalition, though the current leader flirts with the radical right) and one centre (Labor). No other party has a significant number of lower house seats, which is the criteria I was using. The Greens' four seats doesn't make them a major player. And calling them far left is silly, they don't want to end capitalism or change the entire system of government like Melenchon does.
FFS - enough with the radical right business. Can you at least define what that is and its point of difference to a centre-right party.
Labor is not Centre. They are Left. There are factions within Labor who are right leaning and others who are more left leaning. Ditto the Liberal Party but on the other side.

Nobody in the Labor Party would call themselves a Centrist Party. The only ones who tend to do this are Greens to make themselves feel better.
 
The fact is they still need to form Coalitions to get power. Which mean the minor parties in any coalition have to bend to the will of the majority partner.
Wrong. Any other party is free to offer a deal, and any party can pull the plug. If one party tries to strongarm another, the deal doesn't get made, or the government collapses. It forces parties to negotiate in good faith if they want stability in power.

What defines radical-right btw?
Embracing xenophobia.
 
FFS - enough with the radical right business. Can you at least define what that is and its point of difference to a centre-right party.
If you were patient, you'd have seen my response above! The radical right are nativists embracing xenophobia. They paint those of the majority group as the "real" people of that country and immigrants as an "other". They win votes by dividing the people into "us" and "them" on racial, ethnic, or religious grounds.

Labor is not Centre. They are Left. There are factions within Labor who are right leaning and others who are more left leaning. Ditto the Liberal Party but on the other side.
The ideology of individual Labor Party MPs is irrelevant, because they all have to vote the same way in parliament. The way they've performed in government isn't leftist at all. They've failed to increase welfare payments in real terms, only by the mandatory indexation. They've failed to seriously intervene in the housing market to ensure affordability. They've failed to embrace any sort of price fixing of consumer goods. These would all be leftist solutions to the problems Australia faces.

Nobody in the Labor Party would call themselves a Centrist Party.
And the Democratic People's Republic of Korea calls themselves Democratic and a Republic.

The only ones who tend to do this are Greens to make themselves feel better.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
 
Embracing xenophobia.
It's just going to be a bullshit cat and mouse around semantics.

Dutton has never been found guilty in a court of law of being xenophobic. He has never stated he is xenophobic. So how can you say that he is xenophobic? Can you read his mind?​

Then you'll give examples of Dutton or the Coalition etc. For example, his reference to deporting protestors.

How is this xenophobic? What part do you disagree with? And then it's back to court of law balah blah​


This poster is just here to flood the zone with shit. Post misinformation and muddy everything up.
Caught in one lie, use another lie to cover that lie and add another lie about something new.

Mouthpiece.
 
Wrong. Any other party is free to offer a deal, and any party can pull the plug. If one party tries to strongarm another, the deal doesn't get made, or the government collapses. It forces parties to negotiate in good faith if they want stability in power.


Embracing xenophobia.
You must be living in some sort of utopia if you think that's what happens in real life.

Your definition of 'radical right' is laughable. That could mean anything.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Anthony Albanese - How long? -3-

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top