No, I just pay attention to the news.You must be living in some sort of utopia if you think that's what happens in real life.
Your everything is laughable.Your definition of 'radical right' is laughable. That could mean anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I just pay attention to the news.You must be living in some sort of utopia if you think that's what happens in real life.
Your everything is laughable.Your definition of 'radical right' is laughable. That could mean anything.
So how is Dutton and the LNP radical right then?If you were patient, you'd have seen my response above! The radical right are nativists embracing xenophobia. They paint those of the majority group as the "real" people of that country and immigrants as an "other". They win votes by dividing the people into "us" and "them".
The ideology of individual Labor Party MPs is irrelevant, because they all have to vote the same way in parliament. The way they've performed in government isn't leftist at all. They've failed to increase welfare payments in real terms, only by the mandatory indexation. They've failed to seriously intervene in the housing market to ensure affordability. They've failed to embrace any sort of price fixing of consumer goods. These would all be leftist solutions to the problems Australia faces.
And the Democratic People's Republic of Korea calls themselves Democratic and a Republic.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
Labor can't do what you want them to do because THERE IS NO MONEY. Again, you are living in some sort of utopia where the magic money press gets to work and distributes to all and sundry and somehow inflation is not impacted. Those solutions are not solutions at all because they are completely unrealistic and unsustainable. I may as well dream of Essendon winning the next ten premierships.
There’s billions for AUKUS.So how is Dutton and the LNP radical right then?
He has constantly praised the migrants of this country and their contribution to Australian society. I think what you really want is complete and unfettered open borders.
Labor can't do what you want them to do because THERE IS NO MONEY. Again, you are living in some sort of utopia where the magic money press gets to work and distributes to all and sundry and somehow inflation is not impacted. Those solutions are not solutions at all because they are completely unrealistic and unsustainable. I may as well dream of Essendon winning the next ten premierships.
Lol.FFS - enough with the radical right business. Can you at least define what that is and its point of difference to a centre-right party.
Labor is not Centre. They are Left. There are factions within Labor who are right leaning and others who are more left leaning. Ditto the Liberal Party but on the other side.
Nobody in the Labor Party would call themselves a Centrist Party. The only ones who tend to do this are Greens to make themselves feel better.
Wow, they proved you right within five minutes.It's just going to be a bullshit cat and mouse around semantics.
Dutton has never been found guilty in a court of law of being xenophobic. He has never stated he is xenophobic. So how can you say that he is xenophobic? Can you read his mind?
Then you'll give examples of Dutton or the Coalition etc. For example, his reference to deporting protestors.
How is this xenophobic? What part do you disagree with? And then it's back to court of law balah blah
This poster is just here to flood the zone with shit. Post misinformation and muddy everything up.
Caught in one lie, use another lie to cover that lie and add another lie about something new.
Mouthpiece.
This is a completely innumerate reply.Labor can't do what you want them to do because THERE IS NO MONEY. Again, you are living in some sort of utopia where the magic money press gets to work and distributes to all and sundry and somehow inflation is not impacted. Those solutions are not solutions at all because they are completely unrealistic and unsustainable. I may as well dream of Essendon winning the next ten premierships.
Good to see wide ranging opinions on what ideological positions the major and minor parties behold themselves to.
That's all it is, opinion, for example some would view the greens as radical left, at the same time anyone that holds radical left ideals would label the ALP as radical far right.
That's not even mentioning the different factions within those parties who have different ideals to someone else in the same party.
As for the thread topic, I suspect anyone with a modicum of reality, should vote for the incumbent. Not because they're 'great' but because I don't view the alternative as any good.
I'm hoping for a minority govt. that will have more power to hold the govt. more accountable.
A minority government can also provide an excuse to do even more nothing.
A minority government can also provide an excuse to do even more nothing.
Working with teals in the reps and greens in the senate. With teals and greens desperate to not be seen as in step
Could be interesting to say the least
Teals and Greens would both support climate action, but differ in their views on the economic policies I imagine.
Didn't the last minority coalition government (Gillard) pass a record amount of legislation?Working with teals in the reps and greens in the senate. With teals and greens desperate to not be seen as in step
Could be interesting to say the least
I am curious about this as England has 2 or 3 major ones. Labor is one of them (mainly because I think of Tony Blair when he was prime Minister when the 2003 Iraq invasion happened). I forgot the other major party, I know it's a right wing party just like the liberals here.Many European parties have 3. Or more. Greens on the left, far right parties, plus the usual centrist 2 parties exist across many jurisdictions, and coalition govts have resulted (sometimes of nominally opposed groups).
Gillard needed independents to form govt, Greens have been in coalitions in several state jurisdictions here. If teals retain and win more seats, even though not formally a 'party', they will hold more sway over formation of govt. Especially as they're in the lower house, which is where Greens have struggled for seats. Democrats were the same, mainly a senate party. Teals have had a bigger impact than both in a single election. They'll be under pressure this time from the 2 majors media campaigns, but both majors are bleeding members and first preferences, and Holmes a Court is bankrolling.
I disagree it's a pipe dream. (I've followed politics closely for 50 years, trend has been away from the majors for some time. Not a bad thing IMO.)
Nah just sick of the cheerleading posts. Good to try and bring some balance to what is known as a left wing forum
They have the Lib Dems and before that the SDP as a centre left alternative. The Tories had never had much of a rival on the right until Jimmy Goldsmith's Referendum Party popped up at the 1997 election which morphed into various Euroscpetic parties that peaked with UKIP which has now mutated into Reform.I am curious about this as England has 2 or 3 major ones. Labor is one of them (mainly because I think of Tony Blair when he was prime Minister when the 2003 Iraq invasion happened). I forgot the other major party, I know it's a right wing party just like the liberals here.
In that the economic policies we've seen from the Teals are not actually batshit insane, you are correct.
Many greens policies would likely garner popular support if the policy was disconnected from the Greens party.
Better regulation and tax collection on multinationals?
Better taxation of the ultra-wealthy?
Not so batshit.
Yeah, but the public will see through the 'excuses'.A minority government can also provide an excuse to do even more nothing.