Any changes for next week?

[Dippers Donuts]

No injury concerns as far as I could see so perhaps no changes for the tigers?

Will be interesting in a couple of weeks perhaps when Tuck, Boyle and Dew will be available for selection.

 

[hodge = gun]

One of either Tuck or McGlynn must come in for Clarke, just isnt up to AFL standard at the moment, for mine if fit
In: Tuck
Out: Clarke

 

[Leather Poisoning]

No injury concerns as far as I could see so perhaps no changes for the tigers?

Will be interesting in a couple of weeks perhaps when Tuck, Boyle and Dew will be available for selection.

Add stokes to that list - he may have only needed one game in the seconds as a 'light week' before reconsideration for the firsts.

 

[moginie]

Isn't Dew ready to return this week?

 

[Delisted]

Isn't Dew ready to return this week?

Against the collywobbles is the mail.

 

[Mervyn Beasley]

Unless AC has a apecific role lined up for Clarke I'd be bringing McG in.

 

[Boyler_Room]

McG in for Lewis it has to happen. Richmond has been killing clearances.

 

[Go The Mores # 2]

McG in for Lewis it has to happen. Richmond has been killing clearances.

Was that serious ????
Richmond may have been killing clearances but against who ???
Box Hill could beat Freo in the clearances and its not like the Bulldogs are tough in the clinches.
We can get rid of Tim Clarke for this week bcoz Richmond don't have anyone worth tagging. This isnt an arrogant comment im just saying Clarkey is in for a specialist tagging job and i think the tiges should be worrying about us not the other way around.
Clarke Out
Tuck / McGlynn / Stokes IN

 

[play2win]

^nah, leave clarkey in to tag tambling. let's pour salt on the festering sore.

 

[Leather Poisoning]

Was that serious ????
Richmond may have been killing clearances but against who ???
Box Hill could beat Freo in the clearances and its not like the Bulldogs are tough in the clinches.
We can get rid of Tim Clarke for this week bcoz Richmond don't have anyone worth tagging. This isnt an arrogant comment im just saying Clarkey is in for a specialist tagging job and i think the tiges should be worrying about us not the other way around.
Clarke Out
Tuck / McGlynn / Stokes IN

Despite not winning the game they pumped collingwood in the clearances as well.

 

[markr]

Good ruckman and Foley is one of the best in the comp at clearances. But how does swapping Lewis for McGlynn achieve anything except make us worse?

 

[Roughie]

Was that serious ????
Richmond may have been killing clearances but against who ???
Box Hill could beat Freo in the clearances and its not like the Bulldogs are tough in the clinches.
We can get rid of Tim Clarke for this week bcoz Richmond don't have anyone worth tagging. This isnt an arrogant comment im just saying Clarkey is in for a specialist tagging job and i think the tiges should be worrying about us not the other way around.
Clarke Out
Tuck / McGlynn / Stokes IN

Umm arent dogs one of the top contested football winners in the league?

 

[Roughie]

Good ruckman and Foley is one of the best in the comp at clearances. But how does swapping Lewis for McGlynn achieve anything except make us worse?

Who knows? Look for Sewell to tear Foley a new one!

 

[Go The Mores # 2]

Umm arent dogs one of the top contested football winners in the league?

Yeh statistically they might be however I doubt the likes of mitchell hodge crawford sewell and lewis are gonna be overly terrified facing the bunch of cats the bulldogs have running around

 

[Roughie]

Yeh statistically they might be however I doubt the likes of mitchell hodge crawford sewell and lewis are gonna be overly terrified facing the bunch of cats the bulldogs have running around

Boyd, Hahn, Cooney and Griffen are their big improvers this year esspecially in the phsyical attributes of their game thus why they have risen in their contested football.

I think Tim Clarke will line up on Jake King. King is a hard running player for the Tigers who does alot of roles and he gets a fair bit of the footy. He isnt the most sound by foot, but he gives them alot of drive off the backline and Tim Clarke would be perfect to line up on him. He can run with him, they are simmilar heights and builds. Plus Clarke doesnt get really fired up so he wont be sucked in when Kingy starts sooking cos he is getting domianted.

 

[Leather Poisoning]

Boyd, Hahn, Cooney and Griffen are their big improvers this year esspecially in the phsyical attributes of their game thus why they have risen in their contested football.

I think Tim Clarke will line up on Jake King. King is a hard running player for the Tigers who does alot of roles and he gets a fair bit of the footy. He isnt the most sound by foot, but he gives them alot of drive off the backline and Tim Clarke would be perfect to line up on him. He can run with him, they are simmilar heights and builds. Plus Clarke doesnt get really fired up so he wont be sucked in when Kingy starts sooking cos he is getting domianted.

Would Timmy outweigh him?

 

[Roughie]

Would Timmy outweigh him?

I would think so, but Kingy is pretty physical the bloke did something around 300 push ups in the preseason!

 

[Dixie Flatline]

Out: Clarke
In: McGlynn

 

[xellis]

No changes. Unless there was a specific change due to match ups.. can't really think of any though..

 

[Eel_storm]

Out Hodge, in whoever.

 

[Mervyn Beasley]

Out Hodge, in whoever.

^^^^^^^

 

[Eel_storm]

A week in the twos is long overdue.

 

[Davo23]

A week in the twos is long overdue.

Put Mitch down with Hodge: it will improve Box Hill AND Hawthorn.

And Buddy shouldn't get too complacent: he's had 5 good games, but his position is not secure.....



.

 

[Eel_storm]

Put Mitch down with Hodge: it will improve Box Hill AND Hawthorn.

And Buddy shouldn't get too complacent: he's had 5 good games, but his position is not secure.....



.

Mitch is consistently good, as is Buddy.

 

[Roughie]

Mitch is consistently good, as is Buddy.

So are you serious about dropping Hodge?