Australian Survivor: Blood vs Water

[MrsEddieBetts]

Reminder that NO BETTING ODDS are to be posted otherwise you’ll be voted off the island.

 

[Hamingja]

Ok it didn't matter anyway but crazy stuff that Josh didn't vote for Mark there.

 

[buttsauce]

So Josh wrote Chrissie's name down?

Yes. He’s a moron.

 

[Roobs321]

3 Josh
1 Chrissie

so awkward but it had to be

 

[AdelaideGT]

Mark is exactly where he wanted to be right now - so well played that man.

But as I said above a bitter jury may now respect Shay's survival game a bit more.

If there is any logic in the world Chrissie should have no chance.

 

[Willo_]

Surely Mark just wins from here, feel like he's articulate enough and will handle it well.
Chrissy has no resume, Shay's only claim is she survived on the bottom... If Mark can show he controlled the game he'll walk it in

 

[Hamingja]

Realistically Chrissy didn't have a choice did she if Shay just said she was voting Josh and that's that.

If she forced a Mark v Josh tie she would get rocked out herself (also assuming Josh didn't shit it)

 

[AdelaideGT]

If she forced a Mark v Josh tie she would get rocked out herself.

Wouldn't it have been a Mark v Josh fire challenge?

 

[Chicago1]

Hero's edit fer sure!

 

[AdelaideGT]

FINALLY - a final breakfast where they don't scramble the eggs.

In previous Survivor, if I was in final 2/3 I woulda been going 'just save two eggs for me, I'll fry mine after you guys are done'.

 

[Kirby]

Mark did well there and should win.

It seems we have a very bitter jury though. Sam looks miserable.

 

[Hamingja]

Wouldn't it have been a Mark v Josh fire challenge?

hmm I don't even remember what the US did before the immunity winner just picks who goes to fire.

 

[Struggle]

They need to bring in the final tribal fire making challenge. Immunity winner brings one through, the other two battle it out

 

[Ry009]

Providing Mark doesn't go full blow arrogant he should win.

Been articulate enough so far.

 

[kirky]

hmm I don't even remember what the US did before the immunity winner just picks who goes to fire.

Well it use to be a final two or three with someone being voted off at final 4 or final 3. In the case with 3, the person with immunity choose who they took to the end. This hasn’t happened for the past 14 seasons - it has been a final 3 since series 28.

Only in recent times has it been a fire challenge to make final 3.

 

[AdelaideGT]

Mark is doing a good job of showing his strategic ability while also getting brownie points from those on the jury who have anger against him.

 

[Bingle_21]

Skipped a few pages so apologies if been said. But can they P!ss off the constant ad at the bottom right of screen

 

[Hamingja]

Well it use to be a final two or three with someone being voted off at final 4 or final 3.

Yeah but what was the tie breaker if it ended up 2-2 at the final 4

 

[Kirby]

Good speech Mark…..not so much Shay

 

[AdelaideGT]

But can they P!ss off the constant ad at the bottom right of screen

even worse on channels where they cover up the footy score (etc) with those ads.

 

[Kirby]

Chrissy doing a good job in pleading for votes

 

[Sinnthesis]

Chrissy has a persuasive argument

 

[darrenmorgan]

Chrissie getting the winners music!

 

[Ry009]

Don't think Shay or Chrissie have been anywhere near Mark, but their speeches are as good as they could have been, and better than I was expecting.

 

[AdelaideGT]

As I said - above - Chrissie comes across as so fake. Trying to suck up to the jury now for every point she can get. Hope any bitterness in the jury doesn't help her case.

It probably should be 1) Mark 2) Shay 3) Chrissie when it comes down to outlast/outwit/outplay.

 

[Chicago1]

I'd vote for Chrissie! LOL

All were persuasive in their own way. Mark topped them.