hawkman
Hall of Famer
Buddy's 8 against the Dogs in the 08 QF. Just peak Buddy and made a mess of both Morris and Lake. Never played a better final after that. Only the 07 EF rivals it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dumb comment. Goals are scarcer and more precious these days. Dusty kicking 4 as a half forward in a low scoring game had more impact on the result of the 2020 GF than Ablett kicking 9 did on the 89 result. Of course those performances are on the same level as far as best GF performancesErr who cares?
Dumb comment. Goals are scarcer and more precious these days. Dusty kicking 4 as a half forward in a low scoring game had more impact on the result of the 2020 GF than Ablett kicking 9 did on the 89 result. Of course those performances are on the same level as far as best GF performances
LOL. He literally kicked one of those goals during the last couple of minutes of the game in junk time. So 3 of the goals you can classify as an impact if you want to go down that route. Ablett almost single handedly won the game for geelong, where as Richmond were running all over geelong and would have won anyway. Prestias 2 goals were just as crucial as martins 2 before. Also ablett kicked 42% of geelongs goals, Martin kicked 33%. You can’t even logic your own argument properly which is embarrassing.Dumb comment. Goals are scarcer and more precious these days. Dusty kicking 4 as a half forward in a low scoring game had more impact on the result of the 2020 GF than Ablett kicking 9 did on the 89 result. Of course those performances are on the same level as far as best GF performances
No current season stats available
Learn to read. I said the % of the goals kicked that day. Ablett kicked 9/42 = 21%. Dusty kicked 4 out of 19 = 21%.LOL. He literally kicked one of those goals during the last couple of minutes of the game in junk time. So 3 of the goals you can classify as an impact if you want to go down that route. Ablett almost single handedly won the game for geelong, where as Richmond were running all over geelong and would have won anyway. Prestias 2 goals were just as crucial as martins 2 before. Also ablett kicked 42% of geelongs goals, Martin kicked 33%. You can’t even logic your own argument properly which is embarrassing.
There are so many players who have kicked 4 goals in grand finals it’s just meh… nowhere near what others have achieved. Insulting and showing a simpleton footy brain that doesn’t go back before the year 2017 in its recall.
But in your heart of hearts you know Ablett's '89 finals series and grand final performance still blow any of Dusty's out of the water.Learn to read. I said the % of the goals kicked that day. Ablett kicked 9/42 = 21%. Dusty kicked 4 out of 19 = 21%.
One was playing at FF, the other as a half forward/mid.
You say there are loads of players who have kicked 4 in GFs and that it’s meh. You don’t seem to realise that the average scores in AFL have steadily decreased over the years, so that a goal now is worth a lot more than it was in the 80s or 90s.
How many players have kicked 4 or > 20% total goals as a half forward/mid, in a highly contested, close game, rather than a blowout?
Let’s have a look:
2022 - blowout, over at half time
2021 - blowout, over at half tome
2020 - Dusty kicks 4 out of 19 (21%), all extremely difficult goals that hardly any other players in the comp could have kicked, including 1 to keep Richmond in the game when they were otherwise in massive trouble just before half time, and another to shift the momentum on the 3rd
2019 - blowout
2018 - close - no player kicks > 3
2017 - solid win - only one player kicks 3
2016 - close - no player kicks > 3
2015 - blowout, over at half time
2014 - blowout
2013 - solid win - hawthorn up 4 goals at half time, one deep forward kicks 4
2012 - close - one player (FF) kicks 3
2011 - close until late - one deep forward kicks 4 in shoot out (out of 30 goals total) = 13% goals
2010a - close and low scoring (19 goals total, like 2020). No player kicks > 2
2010b - blowout, over at half time
2009 - close, low scoring (19 goals like 2020.) one player (key forward) kicks 3
2008 - close, one player (deep forward) kicks 3
2007 - blowout
2006 - close, no player kicks > 3
2005 - close, no player kicks > 2
2004 - solid win, one player kicks 4 in shootout (27 goals total) = 15% goals
2003 - blowout
2002 - close, 2 key position forwards kick 4 out of 19 (21% each)
2001 - solid win - a key forward kicks 4, and a FF kicks 5 out of 27 (18.5%)
2000 - blowout
1999 - over at half time, 31 goals kicked, a pocket and a flanker kick 4 each (13% goals each)
1998 - Jarman kicks 5 from FF in the last quarter to win the game out of 23 total goals) = 21.7% total goals
1997 - shootout - 32 goals kicked. Jarman kicks 6, Ellen 5, both < 20% total goals kicked
1996 - solid win in shootout, Lockett kicks 6 out of 32 (18%)
1995 - blowout
1994 - blowout
1993 - blowout - 33 goals kicked, Kernahan kicks 7 in losing side (21%)
1992 - solid win - Sumich 6, Matera kicks 5 off the wing, out of 28 = (18%)
1991 - solid win - 33 goals kicked, 5 Sumich, 4 Heady, 6 Dunstall, 4 Brereton - all deep/key forwards. dunstall’s 6 is still only 18% of goals
1990 - solid win, no player kicks > 2
1989 - close, Ablett kicks 9 out of 42 = 21% goals in losing side
So you’re completely wrong.
It’s incredibly rare to kick > 20% of the goals kicked, especially in a game where the player’s team is down at halftime.
And it’s basically unprecedented for it to be done by a half forward rotating though the middle. Jarman’s 5 in the 4th quarter was brilliant, but even then he was a pure full forward in that quarter. Matera kicked his 5 as a true wing, but that actually made up less than 20% of goals kicked. Ablett and Kernahan were impressive in 89 and 93 kicking bags, but didn’t a tully influence the result.
So to say Dusty’s 2020 isn’t in the top bracket of GF performances is delusional
No current season stats available
Dumb comment. Goals are scarcer and more precious these days. Dusty kicking 4 as a half forward in a low scoring game had more impact on the result of the 2020 GF than Ablett kicking 9 did on the 89 result. Of course those performances are on the same level as far as best GF performances
Finals series - yes sure.But in your heart of hearts you know Ablett's '89 finals series and grand final performance still blow any of Dusty's out of the water.
Haha well done. Can’t argue with those numbersSo, despite Coventry kicking bags of 9 and 7 you are suggesting his 2 goals in the 1927 Grand Final is the greatest performance ever. He kicked 66% of the goals on the day and kicked one more goals than Richmond. Now that is impact.
Yeah, it's a truly ridiculous argument started by Meteoric Rise. All it shows is how weak those opposition performances were and how on top of them Richmond's excellent defence was. Martin was the A1 slingshot final target. Tired legs got swarmed and Martin finished them off.So, despite Coventry kicking bags of 9 and 7 you are suggesting his 2 goals in the 1927 Grand Final is the greatest performance ever. He kicked 66% of the goals on the day and kicked one more goals than Richmond. Now that is impact.
It’s only ridiculous if you focus on % of goals without considering the closeness of the game. J Riewoldt kicked 5 out of 20 (25%) in 2019, but no one thinks it’s particularly impressive, because it was a blowout where he got on the end of a few. There’s no reason not to focus on % of goals kicked in tight games. There’s a reason why almost no players have ever kicked > 20% goals kicked in games that were still tight at half or 3/4 time.Yeah, it's a truly ridiculous argument started by Meteoric Rise. All it shows is how weak those opposition performances were and how on top of them Richmond's excellent defence was. Martin was the A1 slingshot final target. Tired legs got swarmed and Martin finished them off.
If you analyse the whole thing it's Hardwick who comes out looking most impressive and his peers impotent. The play worked like a charm, over and over.
There's a reason not to and there's a reason I've only seen it used twice, both by Richmond supporters. It's a fun quirk but really doesn't mean much.It’s only ridiculous if you focus on % of goals without considering the closeness of the game. J Riewoldt kicked 5 out of 20 (25%) in 2019, but no one thinks it’s particularly impressive, because it was a blowout where he got on the end of a few. There’s no reason not to focus on % of goals kicked in tight games. There’s a reason why almost no players have ever kicked > 20% goals kicked in games that were still tight at half or 3/4 time.
Your point about Dusty and Richmond slingshotting doesn’t even make sense, if you’re talking about 2020. 3 of his 4 goals were in heavy traffic, either breaking or balking tackles, amd the other he was outnumbered but read the ball better and kicked a 60m goal. He wasn’t just getting on the end of it for any of them.
Lol ok. It was because Geelong were tired that Dusty kicked 3 freak goals in the second and third quarters, or, even better, it was because Geelong players just didn’t defend him properly, the implication being that anyone could have kicked those goals. That’s the reason why he kicked those goals with a fend-off then snap over his shoulder, a running contested banana, and a top spinning punt from 60 calculated to slide through an open goals square. He kicked those because of Geelong making basic mistakes and being tired, and any player could have done it. Doesn’t sound at all like you’re making up desperate rationalisations to minimise a great performance.There's a reason not to and there's a reason I've only seen it used twice, both by Richmond supporters. It's a fun quirk but really doesn't mean much.
Richmond's swarm and constant pressure on ball carrier plus masterful blocking off of exits wore every team down in finals those years. By the second half teams were completely gassed and out of ideas. Then once Richmond had the 3 goal lead it was game over, nobody was chasing them down.
A lot of tired opposition midfield/defender efforts in the Dusty highlights packages - particularly grand finals. Or you just had guys like Tuohy, Kolo or Shaw not really doing the basics well at all.
They were all good performances but I have no problem admitting a Hodge '08 or Davis '05 impressed me more.
You're being disingenuous now so it's time to end the discussion.Lol ok. It was because Geelong were tired that Dusty kicked 3 freak goals in the second and third quarters, or, even better, it was because Geelong players just didn’t defend him properly, the implication being that anyone could have kicked those goals. That’s the reason why he kicked those goals with a fend-off then snap over his shoulder, a running contested banana, and a top spinning punt from 60 calculated to slide through an open goals square. He kicked those because of Geelong making basic mistakes and being tired, and any player could have done it. Doesn’t sound at all like you’re making up desperate rationalisations to minimise a great performance.
Happy to end the discussion if that’s your preference, but will point out I’m not being disingenuous, which means insincere.You're being disingenuous now so it's time to end the discussion.
Insincere because you presented my view that "anyone could do" what Martin did. We call that a strawman and it's very much not an argument based in sincerity. Likewise restating someone's argument in a silly, overstated manner so as to ridicule it.Happy to end the discussion if that’s your preference, but will point out I’m not being disingenuous, which means insincere.
I was being sarcastic, but entirely sincere. Please feel free to correct me if I’ve misrepresented your point or its implications.
Yeah, it's a truly ridiculous argument started by Meteoric Rise. All it shows is how weak those opposition performances were and how on top of them Richmond's excellent defence was. Martin was the A1 slingshot final target. Tired legs got swarmed and Martin finished them off.
Richmond's swarm and constant pressure on ball carrier plus masterful blocking off of exits wore every team down in finals those years. By the second half teams were completely gassed and out of ideas. Then once Richmond had the 3 goal lead it was game over, nobody was chasing them down.
It’s not a straw man. You objected to Richmond fans saying Dusty kicking 4 out of 19 goals in a tightly contested GF was impressive, on the basis that all it showed was that:A lot of tired opposition midfield/defender efforts in the Dusty highlights packages - particularly grand finals. Or you just had guys like Tuohy, Kolo or Shaw not really doing the basics well at all.