Nope, I never said the performance wasn't impressive. I said that the % of total goals scored wasn't something I considered a valid reason to put it over Ablett's grand final in 1989. I'm perfectly fine with you disagreeing on that point, but to then to reformat my argument and suggest rating it very highly but not the highest is because of the Richmond/Geelong connection or some inherent Martin dislike ("desperate rationalisation" absolutely makes that your contention here) - well I take issue with that.It’s not a straw man. You objected to Richmond fans saying Dusty kicking 4 out of 19 goals in a tightly contested GF was impressive, on the basis that all it showed was that:
- opposition was weak
- Richmond defence was dominant
- Hardwick out-strategised oppo coaches
- Martin was the slingshot final target (ie finished off others’ good work)
- Dusty’s opponents were exhausted
- Dusty’s opponents were not doing the basics well
You literally listed all of those things as the reasons why Dusty kicking > 20% of the goals in the 2020 GF was not particularly impressive.
Surely, if those are all the real reasons why he kicked 4, and thus the reason why it’s not that impressive an effort, then an implication of your argument is that lots of other players could have done the same thing?
From the bullet points you've highlighted, to some degree I factor those points in, yes. Again, you can have a different stance. It doesn't mean that I think Martin was average in any sense that night. It doesn't mean at all that I think "anybody" could do it. In my personal opinion it wasn't the greatest performance I've seen on a football field. Is that okay?
Note that "not impressive" or "not particularly impressive" are yet to feature in my posts. If I rate Martin's performance 9/10 that night and a handful at 9.5/10 - I am absolutely very impressed by all of these performances.