Miguel Sanchez
(Unique injury) TBC
It is merely a statement that will eventually prove to be fact. What has it got to do with you anyway.
I just don't like trolls.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It is merely a statement that will eventually prove to be fact. What has it got to do with you anyway.
You could say the same about Dreamteam scores.These rankings are based on real results that point to how well players performed. These are more valid than someone's subjective view of how good they think a player is.
Well, I'd say that's bullshit.For example the stats show that Cox is the best ruckman in the competition and Jimmy Bartel is the best player overall followed by Joel Corey.
Why is it dangerous?It is very dangerous to ignore stats but they certainly don't reveal the full story.
I don't need those stats to tell you why we finished second-last.But these stats give a pretty good idea why we finished second last having been beaten by the bottom team. We have a long way to go. This means players being fit enough to perform and mature enough not to get rubbed out.
Why is it dangerous?
What happens if people ignore stats?
I once ignored a stat and it went away.I once ignored a stat and I flipped out, went completely mad.
FB waters glass schofield
HB selwood hunter jones
C hurn priddis embley
HF lecras kennedy ebert
FF mckinley brown wirrpanda
R cox kerr masten
INT makenzie lynch butler schofield
Not bad for being done back in July !Easiest task all year!
FB: Waters, Glass, A.Selwood
HB: Embley, McKenzie, B.Jones
C: Rosa, Masten, Hurn
HF: Ebert, Kennedy, McNamara
FF: LeCras, Lynch, Walters
RR: Cox, Kerr, Priddis
INT: Brown, Rich, Butler, Wirrapanda
EMG: Davis, Wilkes, Houlihan.
Mckinley, Stenglein, Staker, Hansen, Seaby, Fletcher, Graham, Braun and Armstrong are either Delisted, Traded or Retired.
I agree looks promising. Add 1 or 2 draftees to that tooNot bad for being done back in July !
I am soooooo glad I was wrong about Mckinley.
How I would have it NOW
FB: Waters, Glass, A.Selwood
HB: Embley, Hunter, B.Jones
C: Rosa, Butler, Hurn
HF: Ebert, Kennedy, Staker
FF: LeCras, Brown, McKinley
RR: Cox, Kerr, Priddis
INT: Lynch, McNamara, Masten, Wirrapanda
EMG: Davis, Wilkes, Nicoski.
Still looks good, I couldn't fit Seaby, Stenglein, Fletcher, MacKenzie, Houlihan, Hansen, Scooter, McGinnity, Schofield and Spangher.
A good mix of youth and Experiance to choose from and thats without the Draftees eg: RICH, Walters, Zaharakis, Klemke, Cockie.
WOW how good are we going to be in 09 if we stay injury free.
All except for RICH in bold should be swapped with NICNAT in bold italics with the * symbol either side some exclamation marks capitals some thumbs up symbols and a HELL YEAH BABY.
I once ignored a stat and I flipped out, went completely mad.
AHHHHHHHHH NOPE!!!!!!!!!!All except for RICH in bold should be swapped with NICNAT in bold italics with the * symbol either side some exclamation marks capitals some thumbs up symbols and a HELL YEAH BABY.
AHHHHHHHHH NOPE!!!!!!!!!!
Look how this team would look with 2 more seasons (2011) with the players that I think we will draft.
(2)D.Rich, (18)D.Zaharakis,(20) M.Walters,(36) J.Blight, (52)D.Gourdis.
FB: B.Waters, D.Glass, B.Wilkes
HB: R.Davis, M.Brown, A.Selwood
C: D.Zaharakis, D.Rich, B.Ebert
HF: B.McKinley, J.Kennedy, S.Hurn
FF: M.LeCras, T.Notte, M.Walters
RR: D.Cox, D.Kerr, C.Masten
INT: W.Sullivan, M.Priddis, S.Selwood, M.Rosa
EMG: D.Gourdis, J.McNamara, W.Schofield.
LOOK AT THAT CENTRE LINE!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOW
He has improved out of sight this year and wont be available at 36.Except if we got Zaharakis at 18 or Gourdis at 52 we wouldnt be getting the best available. This years draft is stronger than last years, yet you have Gourdis going higher this year than last year after doing nothing?, And Zaharakis id be looking at with maybe pick 36, he's overage with poor kicking skills, we dont need that
Surely Lynch at CHB would be a step backwards.FB: Nicko, Glass, Hunter
HB: Hurn, Lynch, B.Jones
C: Masten, Butler, Lecras
HF: Waters, Kennedy, Staker
FF: Wirra, Brown, McKinley
RR: Cox, Kerr, Priddis
INT: Embley, Ebert, A. Selwood, Rosa
EMG from: Hansen, Fletcher, Seaby, Schofield, Mckenzie, Mcnamara, Houlihan, Draft Pick 3/18
If one of our picks is a forward, could take Staker's spot on a HFF... Not sure where he is going to fit again this year, midfield tagger could be good, he has the strength but not sure if he has the engine.
Surely Lynch at CHB would be a step backwards.
Either Hunter stays there, or we force a younger player up the curve.
If Lynch is going to be moved away from the goal-mouth, he's going to be spending his time between the arcs. That's where we get value from him.[/quote]
Agree 100%
The best value we will get from Lynch is in a creating / attacking role not defensive. Still not convinced he has the pace or the mental toughness to stand on an opposition forward on the lead.
I can see Lynch developing into a very good utility player, he can cover every position in the forward line, have a run on the ball and even ruck. In defense he would be better as the loose man and told to just read the play and attack the ball.
Lynch getting the ball on the wing and pumping it 60+m forward with McKinely nudging his opponent under the long ball will pay big dividends next year IMO.
Lynch on a wing then... Hunter should not be CHB, he is at best a third tall where he can still run off and create. He gets monstered by J Brown, Nick Riewoldt and co. I still think Brown would be a waste at CHB when he can crash packs as a fwd...Surely Lynch at CHB would be a step backwards.
Either Hunter stays there, or we force a younger player up the curve.
If Lynch is going to be moved away from the goal-mouth, he's going to be spending his time between the arcs. That's where we get value from him.[/quote]
Agree 100%
The best value we will get from Lynch is in a creating / attacking role not defensive. Still not convinced he has the pace or the mental toughness to stand on an opposition forward on the lead.
I can see Lynch developing into a very good utility player, he can cover every position in the forward line, have a run on the ball and even ruck. In defense he would be better as the loose man and told to just read the play and attack the ball.
Lynch getting the ball on the wing and pumping it 60+m forward with McKinely nudging his opponent under the long ball will pay big dividends next year IMO.
FB: Nicko, Glass, Hunter
HB: Hurn, ______, B.Jones
C: Masten, Butler, Lynch
HF: Waters, Kennedy, Lecras
FF: Wirra, Brown, McKinley
RR: Cox, Kerr, Priddis
INT: Embley, Ebert, Rosa, Staker.
EMG from: A Selwood, Hansen, Fletcher, Seaby, Schofield, Mckenzie, Mcnamara, Houlihan, Draft Pick 3/18
CHB is an issue, I guess Brown could go CHB, Hansen to CHF and Kennedy to FF? Hansen would never work as a FF as he can't take a contested mark.
FB: Nicko, Glass, Hunter
HB: A.Selwood, McKenzie, B.Jones
C: Staker, Butler, Hurn
HF: Lynch, Kennedy, Lecras
FF: Wirra, Brown, McKinley
RR: Cox, Kerr, Priddis
INT: Embley, Ebert, A.Selwood, Masten/Stinga
Mr McKenzie come on down!!
also edited just a few for accuracy
Lynch on a wing then... Hunter should not be CHB, he is at best a third tall where he can still run off and create. He gets monstered by J Brown, Nick Riewoldt and co. I still think Brown would be a waste at CHB when he can crash packs as a fwd...
FB: Nicko, Glass, Hunter
HB: Hurn, ______, B.Jones
C: Masten, Butler, Lynch
HF: Waters, Kennedy, Lecras
FF: Wirra, Brown, McKinley
RR: Cox, Kerr, Priddis
INT: Embley, Ebert, Rosa, Staker.
EMG from: A Selwood, Hansen, Fletcher, Seaby, Schofield, Mckenzie, Mcnamara, Houlihan, Draft Pick 3/18
CHB is an issue, I guess Brown could go CHB, Hansen to CHF and Kennedy to FF? Hansen would never work as a FF as he can't take a contested mark.
Adam Selwood is definately in our best 22! Replace Rosa/Ebert with him.
Hansen at FF with Brown at CHB.
Hansen can't take a contested mark and is no good at ground level, how would he work at FF?Adam Selwood is definately in our best 22! Replace Rosa/Ebert with him.
Hansen at FF with Brown at CHB.
IMO Selwood hasn't been quite as good of late, his kicks were lacking pentration and his decision making left a bit to be desired... Ebert is going to be much more important for our next flag tilt, and you could toss a coin between Rosa and Selwood.
Staker could be a better tagging option, has a bit more body and strength to throw around?
Hmmm, this is a bit on the nose.IMO Selwood hasn't been quite as good of late, his kicks were lacking pentration and his decision making left a bit to be desired... Ebert is going to be much more important for our next flag tilt, and you could toss a coin between Rosa and Selwood.
IMO Selwood hasn't been quite as good of late, his kicks were lacking pentration and his decision making left a bit to be desired... Ebert is going to be much more important for our next flag tilt, and you could toss a coin between Rosa and Selwood.