- Jul 10, 2013
- 786
- 298
- AFL Club
- Gold Coast
I think his ego is too big to sit out until the rookie draft by matching bids
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm still unsure about the selection myself. Might have to consult you on the next call.
Oh boy!Chris25 we are waiting on you bud. Give til 6pm but post that its Ben Ronke
Chris25 we are waiting on you bud. Give til 6pm but post that its Ben Ronke
Well I certainly don't want him. I'll have to delay things even longer though, because...
Fremantle bid on Josh Williams. Part of the Gold Coast academy. So over to you Offsider. If you have the spots/points...
Happy to stand corrected Offsider but my read is that you dont have the list spot to do it. Will give you half an hour but otherwise Williams to Fremantle.
Happy to stand corrected Offsider but my read is that you dont have the list spot to do it. Will give you half an hour but otherwise Williams to Fremantle.
He should after Jarrod Garlett getting delisted/quit yesterday
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
He should after Jarrod Garlett getting delisted/quit yesterday
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
If you count Joyce most likely being upgraded off the rookie list then no. If you don't as they haven't done it yet than yes they have a spot.
Garlett offset by Barlow.
McGrath also retired at the Lions giving us an extra pick.
yep, Joyce has gone up, and we brought in Barlow to replace Garlett, so we don't have the list spot to match the Williams bid. He is all Freo's.I have counted Joyce going up Offsider Young_Guns
Obvioulsy I don't. I think 30-60 is his range.
I've said this many times on our draft Board, with pick 18 and 26 i'm sure we will pick up 2 good young players and i trust Del and the team to pick the Gems.Morris, Murphy and Boyd closing in on 35 with Adams likely out the door and Suckling approaching 30 too, though...
I dunno. Think it's an interesting discussion. My concern with taking two forwards is that our next pick is so far back but there are still some pretty significant holes that haven't been touched. Collins, Cordy, Williams, Johannisen, Biggs and R. Smith has the makings of a solid group but four of the six are largely unproven and we have little stock behind them - if one doesn't make it, we're short. Meanwhile, Dickson and Crameri are nearing the end but we have a bit more depth and competition for those forward slots.
With that said, on limited viewing I like both Battle and Hayward so wouldn't complain too much if it worked out that way. I do think it makes our situation in the back half quite dire, though, and in an ideal world perhaps we better balance needs across the two picks (without reaching). Ryan first and Battle second, or Hayward first and Rotham second, for example, would probably be my preferred options - but I haven't followed the draft very closely this year.