Things got a bit dull in here so I thought I’d spice it up. Added a lot of Mayo.Need a snickers mate?
But I’ll repeat the irrefutable: it can’t be any worse under anyone else. He costs a lot. They should make a change.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Things got a bit dull in here so I thought I’d spice it up. Added a lot of Mayo.Need a snickers mate?
How can you actually determine definite 22 players right now? Are you Michael Voss?
Conveniently ignoring the number of senior games those 4 played last year. What was their VFL/AFL %?
Things got a bit dull in here so I thought I’d spice it up. Added a lot of Mayo.
But I’ll repeat the irrefutable: it can’t be any worse under anyone else. He costs a lot. They should make a change.
Cool.Maybe, but I prefer to deal with facts rather than hypotheticals.
Fact, we were in a position to make finals despite the injury list.
Fact, we should have made it anyway.
Fact, our players didn’t have the mental fortitude to get us there.
Fact, the injury list alone did not cost us a finals berth.
I’m sure both will be gone unless they can manage 16+ games. Philp will go too alongside Dow.
Okay, compare us to every club over the past 8 years, pre and post Russell. And tell us how we rank overall, annually with players missing games. Bet you we are bottom quartile every years. Thats why everyone is pissed off about this mess.Not ignoring their value, but it is difficult to determine if they would have played if we had a full list to choose from, unless you are Michael Voss?
Some of the pessimism in this joint when things don't play out perfectly or to expectation is staggering.
I mean seriously, using the Tigers injury list of last year, prior to round 1 to strengthen your argument for round 1 this year is truly bizarre
You’re using the hidden premise that they’re being logical and intelligent.It's not irrefutable at all, otherwise he would be gone
Not a fact.And FACT: it was the biggest single factor. By far.
Also not a fact.And FACT: there is no change in the trajectory of the single biggest factor that caused us to miss finals.
Okay, compare us to every club over the past 8 years, pre and post Russell. And tell us how we rank overall, annually with players missing games. Bet you we are bottom quartile every years. Thats why everyone is pissed off about this mess.
Last question, if Russell leaves in the next 12 months either by club decision or due to wanting to go study or something. Would you then come around to, he wasn’t great at his job? Or do you standby , we are just really unlucky injury wise
You’re using the hidden premise that they’re being illogical and unintelligent.You’re using the hidden premise that they’re being logical and intelligent.
They absolutely do not appear to be reflecting that to me.
Last point how can you know that? There is no update for 3 months and a lot of players did not play practice games, you are having a guess. And from information available, doesn’t appear that wayNot a fact.
Our attitude in the Adelaide game, and brain fades in the final two games, we’re far more costly.
Also not a fact.
We are clearly healthier than last year. It’s also March.
Analytically not comparing a large sample of data pre and post a key person change is not a good idea???Past 8 years, while wanting to discuss Russell?
But let's entertain it, if our injuries have been poor for 8 years, would that be Russell or the type of players we have acquired. As we can certainly name a number of players we drafted and or acquired that had prior injury issues
Unless there is new evidence that suggested Russell was poor at his role, I would have no reason to change my view, like any other aspect
Two things you can count on.
Carlton with an annual injury list that severely handicaps their chances of improvement.
And …
The usual crew of unconditional club defenders here who religiously arrive armed to the teeth with excuses and cop outs for all and sundry involved at the club.
Accountability, it seems, is unfashionable these days but history tends to show, if nothing changes … nothing changes !!
Rank and file supporters aren’t privy to the inner workings so don’t have the answers, just the frustration.
Let’s hope someone in a position of influence does …
Analytically not comparing a large sample of data pre and post a key person change is not a good idea???
It would either determine, things have remained about the same, improved or gone backwards. That’s why you compare before and after.
FYI, I work in finance with a commerce degree, I studied stats and econometrics while at uni. Reason I disclosed that; you need to look into trends, you can’t just say ‘club X is always just unlucky’. You think when super funds decide on portfolio managers they don’t consider their past performance relative to their benchmark? That’s is what needs to be done here
And I am guessing you work in cheerleadingSo you work in finance not fitness / injury management in a team contact sport
Our brain Fades happened cause we had duds in place of the good players who weren’t there that’s a factNot a fact.
Our attitude in the Adelaide game, and brain fades in the final two games, we’re far more costly.
Also not a fact.
We are clearly healthier than last year. It’s also March.
And I am guessing you work in cheerleading
Injuries do not explain Docherty dump kicking and Charlie's performance in round 22/23 last yearOur brain Fades happened cause we had duds in place of the good players who weren’t there that’s a fact
I would say our injuries are as bad as last year to start the season
Like as an artist? Never heard of that professional field beforeNo, realism
Like as an artist? Never heard of that professional field before
Is it players getting injured? Is that it? You may be onto something.If say 6 of the 8 you mentioned are best 22.
That’s 27% of the ‘best team’ on paper missing, seems pretty bad to me.
Percentage is pretty similar of the entire list, and has been that way for a few years. Someone wrote look at Richmond, last year they were missing 2 players going into round 1.
The club has a serious problem in this area, and it’s not just recruiting injury prone players