Surely Brad Scott as Chief Football Officer reporting directly to board is a good balance between our need for a steady hand and his reluctance for the coaching limelight?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You could also make the case that she didn't want her name in public and thought a settlement was better than going through the mental hardship of going public. The public criticism would be immense. You see it all the time with women trying to hold athletes accountable, there's always a large section of people who will defend the athletes no matter what and will send all kinds of abuse there way.We all know that and Ross has admitted as such regarding the NDA. I've posted this before but if what he did was so egregious and wrong, why was a settlement taken? It would be easy to question the motivations of someone who takes money rather than wants justice/due process, but this is something none of us will ever truly know full details about. I harp, but one also has to ask how come he was cleared by two bodies, one internal and the other official and external, if what he did is so bad that he shouldn't be considered for future coaching roles.
Giansiracusa into $4.50Gia just got crunched
from the 20s down to 4.50Gia just got crunched
You could also make the case that she didn't want her name in public and thought a settlement was better than going through the mental hardship of going public. The public criticism would be immense. You see it all the time with women trying to hold athletes accountable, there's always a large section of people who will defend the athletes no matter what and will send all kinds of abuse there way.
?Gia just got crunched
I also agree with that, I don't believe that settling is an admission of guilt. Sometimes it genuinely is easier and/or better to cop the short term cost to avoid a public case, or risking a trial, as you never truly know which way a jury will swing no matter how innocent/guilty you are.I agree with a lot of that. There is also the other side of the coin where people try to exploit high profile people for money, because rightly or wrongly things can tarnish people's reputations, regardless of the truth or severity. I walk a fine line here because there will almost certainly be swathes of people lining up to accuse me of victim blaming etc etc, but the truth is I have personally supported people on either side of the isle.
What we do have to go on as fact though, is that Ross has never been charged or officially sanctioned for anything. The scuttlebutt is that he would not have fared well in our process from the outset and hence pulled out. The less people we source/interview for the job, the higher likelihood that we end up with a coach that wasn't best available. That's the crux of the issue for me.
from the 20s down to 4.50
Surely Brad Scott as Chief Football Officer reporting directly to board is a good balance between our need for a steady hand and his reluctance for the coaching limelight?
Why?Please God big NO to Gia
I'd be genuinely surprised if he even got an interview.Please God big NO to Gia
not an experienced coach but not sure why the hate?Please God big NO to Gia
Why? What do you know about him that makes you have that opinion? Because he's actually really highly rated and a huge part of Essendon turning it around this yearPlease God big NO to Gia
Why? You obviously don't know how highly rated he is then.I'd be genuinely surprised if he even got an interview.
That's ambiguous.
Either Hewitt has indicated a preference, and it's Carlton because Carlton had interest.
Or
Hewitt has indicated a preference, and nobody knows, but Carlton was interested.
Does Tom Browne do English?
Giansiracusa into $4.50
Er what's caused that...
Gia spotted walking out of Princes Park an hour ago.
Movements like that can happen when a bookmaker has a sharp bet on a fragile market. Or, they (The trading team) could simply be trying to provoke some movement. I'd say the latter is more likely here - punters see $3.50 in from $20 and think it must be a sure thing, and that $3.50 is still great value at that point. They jump on it, and lose.Er what's caused that...