Boxing Day Test: Australia v India @ MCG (Mon - Fri) *Part 2*

[mattymac]

****ing jesus christ. third umpire is ok when it suits hey? frigging joke

 

[roostersgal4eva]

LOL, can review a no-ball but not a wicket. Well done ICC, the 'I' is clearly for incompetence

Really I thought it was I for India...

 

[drummond2fevola]

ha ha ha

 

[Burzum]

Quite lulzy

 

[dan warna]

beauty by siddle to follow up.

great bowling and bad luck going his way.

 

[Public Enemy No1]

absolute rubbish...

god these jelly heats have had some luck

 

[Baby_Jenks]

Won't use the DRS but allow that? Go hard or go home BCCI.

 

[Selective Retention]

Tony whipping his dead horse again.

I wonder what the Indians ever did to him.

 

[eddiesmith]

Surely the no ball checking is a part of the DRS, take it all or none of it...

 

[Ron]

F*** no ball, Siddle has had absolutely no luck today.

Luck? What the **** does luck have to do with following one of the basic rules of the game?

Luck doesn't have anything to do with it, it's plain stupidity.

 

[westaussie76]

For **** sake what more is going to go Indias way this ****en test!!! Still no need for no balls in test cricket, aussies just don't ****en well learn!!!!

 

[Umpa Lumpa]

How can they review a no-ball but not have DRS???

just like an umpire can review if they think the ball bounced before a catch. they also reviewed one of zaheers wickets but his foot was behind the line, so it isn't like it only happens to australians

 

[policegetthatman]

nevermind, ch 9 idiots had hashtag next to tendulkar.

 

[Rob]

So what is the rule? Only the umpire can call for the DRS now?

 

[ManWithNoName]

BF Posters: I'm not anti India, I just want the RIGHT DECISION! IT'S ALL ABOUT THE RIGHT DECISION!
*No ball gets checked and wicket overturned*
BF Posters: Corruption! Evil! How dare they get the right decision!

 

[Hawks1523]

The one time I agree with Grieg the w***er. ****ing indians don't want DRS so **** off all form of reviews. Of course not, there needs to be consistency all round. *****.

 

[the 5th wiggle]

if its a no ball for ****s sake call it you ****wit.should not be able to review it.

 

[beez]

Luck? What the **** does luck have to do with following one of the basic rules of the game?

Luck doesn't have anything to do with it, it's plain stupidity.

Umesh Yadav agrees with this.

 

[The_Reaper]

So one team can review and others can't?

 

[mike14]

I honestly don't understand why the umpire can choose to review a no-ball but not something else.

I'm glad the correct decision was made, that's what the tech is there for. But to use it in one situation and not the other is down right ludicrous

 

[TheMase]

Have to love the irony of an Indian batsman not getting out because of a no-ball replay but being against DRS.

 

[getthefooty]

How come the umpires don't just call the no ball when they see it?

 

[Bucking Beads]

Lyon really doesn't look threatening. Time for Siddle to continue the rage

 

[ioppolo]

This is already about the 5th time this summer there has been a wicket on a no ball, just f***ing call it umps! Or let the game go on! &Y^$%#$%&*$%#^&$%&

 

[Drummond]

I seriously don't understand how incompetent umpires have become. Fancy going upstairs to technology because you can't do your job properly, what a bunch of overpaid hacks. Make a call on the ground, no ball or not a no ball, and stick with it.

Said it after Clarke at the GABBA, saying it again here.