Had to happen sooner or later a self entitled Hawk supporter bringing up the 3 peat lol.Time will tell my guess is he is going for less than what Freo dreamed off
He will be a very rich man and will look back fondly at the 3 GF in his retirement
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Had to happen sooner or later a self entitled Hawk supporter bringing up the 3 peat lol.Time will tell my guess is he is going for less than what Freo dreamed off
He will be a very rich man and will look back fondly at the 3 GF in his retirement
You're missing a third scenarioThe 2 scenarios are you will get less for Hill or you have to keep him and hope he doesnt crack the sads because he isnt getting his pay day
That's generally how buying and selling works. Sellers dream of getting offered way overs. Buyers dream about getting a steal. In most cases it ends up somewhere in the middle satisfying neither parties' dreams but in the ballpark of what both expected. I can't see any reason why Freo would be desperate to sell - I can't see why they'd suddenly accept less than was offered previously but I also don't think StKilda were way outside what Freo would be willing to accept.Time will tell my guess is he is going for less than what Freo dreamed off
If Bing is in play next year they’ll find a way of getting another first in if they trade it for Hill.None of the above. It’s going to be two first rounders with one being 12 and the other being either 13 if you can get that from the doggies or 2020 R1 if you decide to prioritise bringing in Hill over having a shot at Bing next year.
Theres heaps of scenariosYou're missing a third scenario
So you just choose to mention the 2 scenarios that suit your point of view?Theres heaps of scenarios
He gets injured ? or changes his mind ? or plays crap like Croad for another year and comes back for less
They are the 2 most likelySo you just choose to mention the 2 scenarios that suit your point of view?
Max King done another knee, mccartin another concussion, Zac Jones and hanna fail to shine. B. HILL decide to nominate another club. Howard play like JOR, Ben King extend another two years with GC. RATTEN get the sack the second time. St Kilda become VIC version of Adelaide.They are the 2 most likely
Enlighten me on your 3rd
The Saints offer more and we accept it.They are the 2 most likely
Enlighten me on your 3rd
They dont have 6The Saints offer more and we accept it.
But they might get #13 as part of the Bruce trade (upgrading the #18). #12 and #13 is more than #6 and future 3rd.They dont have 6
So you just choose to mention the 2 scenarios that suit your point of view?
[/QUOTE
Forgetting about he get's injured, he changes his mind, he plays like Trent Croad, he gets hit by a car etc etcThey are the 2 most likely
Enlighten me on your 3rd
Ill take 2 as the most likelyForgetting about he get's injured, he changes his mind, he plays like Trent Croad, he gets hit by a car etc etc
1. he stays at Freo
2. Freo takes less than original offer
3. Freo gets more than original offer
It's the last option that many Saints fans (and others) seem to have a convenient blind spot to.
I'm very happy to go on record saying it will be 1 or 3 - if I'm wrong I will be happy to admit that
So you are saying you think we'll accept less than #6 and future 3rd?Ill take 2 as the most likely
We will know in a few days
2. Freo takes less than original offerSo you are saying you think we'll accept less than #6 and future 3rd?
Mate if you're correct I will dip my lid to your judgement - it just makes me laugh how so many people will not even consider the chance that Bell squeezes more out of the Saints than what they originally offered. Old Dinga may be a lot of things but a soft touch or idiot he is not.Ill take 2 as the most likely
We will know in a few days
What do you think the original offer was?2. Freo takes less than original offer
Haha, "facts"? Both the AFL's own website and by far the biggest footy paper in the country have been saying it was a future 2nd rounder that we offered with pick 6, not a third, but no, according to you it's just some guy on here "making things up"!St Kilda offered 6 and a future 3rd, but hey don't let facts get in the way of your constant stream of thought diarrhea.
But they might get #13 as part of the Bruce trade (upgrading the #18). #12 and #13 is more than #6 and future 3rd.
Brad Hill = Tim Kelly?Brad Hill= Tim Kelly
Therefore Pick 6 isnt overs, surely we can both agree on that.
2. Freo takes less than original offer
Brad Hill = Tim Kelly?
Did you seriously just say that!?
Bwahahahahaha!!!!
Last year it was widely reported that we've offered the inferior Dylan Shiel $1.4mil PA over multiple years.
If that's correct you can imagine how much we would have been offering Kelly, had he for instance been wanting to return to Vic, instead of to WA.
If we were willing to pay Shiel $1.4mil PA it's hard to imagine we wouldn't have been willing to pay Kelly at least that much (given the fact he's clearly better than Shiel), which is at least 50% more than we've reportedly offered Hill.
Kelly is much more valuable than Hill.
So much revisionism on this thread its amazing.
To all the Freo supporters I have one question.
What came first - Brad Hill telling Fremantle (specifically Peter Bell) that he wants to leave Freo and return to Melbourne or St Kilda putting an offer before his manager?