LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
He accidentally tweeted a picture of his **** and lied about it. It's not the Kennedy assassination
Why would you tag anyone in a DM?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He accidentally tweeted a picture of his **** and lied about it. It's not the Kennedy assassination
So who at the club questions him about all this? Kinnersly as the VP? I reckon she would make him squirm in his seat during that chat.
It should be dealt with at Board level. It's not really appropriate for the CEO to have that discussion with someone he reports to.I'd say Cook
It should be dealt with at Board level. It's not really appropriate for the CEO to have that discussion with someone he reports to.
It should be dealt with at Board level. It's not really appropriate for the CEO to have that discussion with someone he reports to.
If the CEO is being tasked with cleaning this up, our governance is cooked. Cook might be advising Sayers and the VP and the Board generally about options, risks, consequences etc but it’s a Board issue to deal with.You'd be surprised
If the CEO is being tasked with cleaning this up, our governance is cooked. Cook might be advising Sayers and the VP and the Board generally about options, risks, consequences etc but it’s a Board issue to deal with.
I’m a bit shorted about the silence. Wound have expected some kind of statement, even if something banal like “we’re aware but need to follow due process” etc.
so the knoll wasn't grassy? as I said a while back, he shouldn't be President because of what happened under his watch at PwC, this is just icing on the cake. Find a replacement quickly and move on.He accidentally tweeted a picture of his **** and lied about it. It's not the Kennedy assassination
If the CEO is being tasked with cleaning this up, our governance is cooked. Cook might be advising Sayers and the VP and the Board generally about options, risks, consequences etc but it’s a Board issue to deal with.
I’m a bit shorted about the silence. Wound have expected some kind of statement, even if something banal like “we’re aware but need to follow due process” etc.
The lack of any announcement is an absolute disgrace.If the CEO is being tasked with cleaning this up, our governance is cooked. Cook might be advising Sayers and the VP and the Board generally about options, risks, consequences etc but it’s a Board issue to deal with.
I’m a bit shorted about the silence. Wound have expected some kind of statement, even if something banal like “we’re aware but need to follow due process” etc.
Wouldn't expect the club to make any statement until sayers in back in the country
He’s gone AWOL. Off all social media and underground. Cannot be contacted for comment (also applying secret service measures in the quest for justice to find the culprit…or culprits, or cult or whoever can be held responsible).The lack of any announcement is an absolute disgrace.
But par for the course for our board.
Our president attempts to send a pic to an exec at a club sponsor, play on??
This lack of accountability permeates through an organization.
No one knows the status as yetIf that's the case it's just not good enough given it's put a significant commercial sponsorship at risk which is material to the club. This is not just a personal matter.
Seems like the usual tactic of keeping quiet, doing nothing and hoping it just blows over.
We would not be naive enough to think that this can be swept under the carpet. I would be very confident the next time we see sayers speaking publicly it will be resigning from his post.Seems like the usual tactic of keeping quiet, doing nothing and hoping it just blows over.
Who's to say this wasn't a consensual relationship with previous (private) correspondence both ways?Our president attempts to send a pic to an exec at a club sponsor, play on??
Whilst from a professional perpective this would not be an appropriate relationship unless it was declared, two consenting adults can do whatever they like. If he stuffed up sending it publically, that's on him and shouldn't have lied about it. As the Hells Angels say, "three can keep a secret if two a dead". Assuming he is lying, it will probably bite him on the ass harder than that the original act.Who's to say this wasn't a consensual relationship with previous (private) correspondence both ways?
Yes he's likely got a tonne of hurt coming his way regardless. We Just don't know which direction it's coming from yet.Whilst from a professional perpective this would not be an appropriate relationship unless it was declared, two consenting adults can do whatever they like. If he stuffed up sending it publically, that's on him and shouldn't have lied about it. As the Hells Angels say, "three can keep a secret if two a dead". Assuming he is lying, it will probably bite him on the ass harder than that the original act.
Ill hazard a guess and say left, right and centre.Yes he's likely got a tonne of hurt coming his way regardless. We Just don't know which direction it's coming from yet.
If it was kept private this wouldn't even be a conversationWho's to say this wasn't a consensual relationship with previous (private) correspondence both ways?
Article just published in the HUN is journalistic speak for “if you aren’t going to comment to us then we’ll play it out publicly in however way we see fit”
Don’t think it will be long before we know either way…
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com