Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Three peat
Lions should have won four
One less days break in 2004 cost them
Three peat
Lions should have won four
One less days break in 2004 cost them
Sydney were heavy favouritesEssendon went into that game heavy favourites.
I remember how little chance people gave Brisbane, it made the loss all the more miserable, I was so convinced we'd win and I am naturally very Pessimistic
Johnson is really only player from Fitzroy's list that did anything. Although the merge meant Brisbane got access to Brown which they wouldn't have hadUmm, yeah... that worked well for them:
Scott Bamford (24 BL games)
John Barker (8 BL games)
Brad Boyd (15 BL games)
Nick Carter (5 BL games)
Shane Clayton (5 BL games)
Simon Hawking (0 BL games)
Chris Johnson (205 BL games)
Jarrod Molloy (51 BL games)
Only 1 player from Fitzroy was still on their list when they had their dynasty. Next fiction argument???
Hell, wish the OP just included a bloody poll.
Would look like this:
10% Brisbane (Brisbane supporters)
65% Brisbane (Neutral supporters)
20% Hawthorn (Hawthorn supporters)
5% Hawthorn (Neutral supporter... pressed wrong option by accident)
I'm happy with our 3peat. Who cares if people think its the worst one in history, its still a 3 peat. Some teams can't even win one.
On SM-G900I using BigFooty.com mobile app
We have one as well. And it was better than yours.
Nup, I was alive for ours...well most of it I think anyway between the 5 day party, booze, hookers and replays.We have one as well. And it was better than yours.
Congrats mate. Worst three peat is better than no three peatWe have one as well. And it was better than yours.
Are you serious? If you're going to try and sound intelligent, you might want to get your facts straight about how Lynch ended up at Brisbane via Fitzroy. Was never part of the players taken by the Brisbane Lions when Fitzroy was merged with them.
Should I include Martin Pike too then muppet? (That's if you were even aware of the fact that Pike played for Fitzroy. Probably not)
PS... I don't think the board would have accepted my vote to 'not merge' when I was aged 10, so to tar me as a 'pro merger' because I follow Melbourne is about as silly as me tarring you as a dumb campaigner for the simple fact that you support Hawthorn.
Well if you are going to use percentage, why not check the percentage against the best teams (i.e. in finals)? Brisbane were renowned for just aiming to stay healthy while making the top 4 and then backing themselves in the finals to win when it counts.Any objective analysis of the numbers says Hawthorn. Just look at the respective teams percentage (the best measure of how good a team is), looking at all 4 consecutive Grand Finals the respective two clubs played in.
Brisbane - 2001 127.6%
Brisbane - 2002 136.7%
Brisbane - 2003 121.9%
Brisbane - 2004 137.2%
Average percentage: 130.85%
Hawthorn 2012 154.6%
Hawthorn 2013 135.7%
Hawthorn 2014 140.8%
Hawthorn 2015 158.4%
Average percentage: 147.38
Hawthorn were clearly better over that four year era. It pains me to say it because I hate Hawthorn and like Brisbane, but Brisbane were never that good really. Just your standard run-of-the-mill excellent premiership team with a percentage of around 130-ish. Quite normal by premiership standards. There wasn't one year where Brisbane dominated the competition, and you though, "wow, this team is amazing." Port was just as good, if not better than Brisbane in all four of those years, with the possible exception of 2001.
Who was better than Hawthorn in their four years in any of those seasons? No one. Maybe Sydney in 2014 during the season. Maybe. But that's it. And even then you could argue both Hawthorn and Sydney were of the same quality in that year.
It's a bit of a stupid question, really. Brisbane never even finished on top of the ladder.
Well if you are going to use percentage, why not check the percentage against the best teams (i.e. in finals)? Brisbane were renowned for just aiming to stay healthy while making the top 4 and then backing themselves in the finals to win when it counts.
I've crunched the numbers for you
Brisbane Finals Percentage 2001-2004: 146%
Hawthorn Finals Percentage 2012-2015: 132%
So according to your method when it is time to walk the walk (Finals), Brisbane is comfortably ahead
worst 3 peat EVER!I'm happy with our 3peat. Who cares if people think its the worst one in history, its still a 3 peat. Some teams can't even win one.
On SM-G900I using BigFooty.com mobile app
Brisbane easily.
Hawks just cruised through and never were the favourites in any of thier premiership years. Will be forgotten about soon enough.
The fact that they had no star players speaks volumes. A good, solid team but no real stand-outs.
That's a terrible sample to take, as it doesn't include any home games for the Lions.That's one way of looking at it. How about you crunch the numbers for the 4 grand finals then?
Brisbane Grand Final Percentage 2001-2004: 113.04%
Hawthorn Grand Final Percentage 2012-2015: 139.6%
Brisbane were not that good. Hawthorn was way better on virtually any measure. Anyone can see that, even a Hawks hater like me. Brisbane was nothing special (by premiership standards)
We did it without free agency and had to travel interstate to beat our opponents on grand final day.
Hodge isn't fit to lick Voss's boots.