Brisbane or Hawthorn, the Better Three-peat?

Remove this Banner Ad

Hawks would be rioli hodge mitchell lewis roughead birchall who survived from 2008, burgoyne whos got four premierships and the most finals behind tuck
Others are Lake, Hale, Gibson, Gunston as trades and Smith, Hill, Puopolo, Shiels and bruest as draftees
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Brisbane, any day of the week.

even in 2004, they smashed the saints on the Gabba in the first final. no team outside the WCE got close to them there. none of this close stuff like what Hawthorn did in the Prelims. If they played a final at the Gabba, it was a flogging. the fact they then won finals in Sydney and Melbourne is just the icing on the cake. robbed of 2 home finals in 2004 by the MCC and a fairer shot at the 4th.
 
Three peat

Lions should have won four

One less days break in 2004 cost them

Love these forums, filled with mainly envious Ess, Cats, Syd and WCE posters. I really wasn't aware of the level of hate we had but I guess the luckiest, worst and most accidental 3peat ever really has cut many deep.
For entertainment and a reminder of how lucky I've been to follow this club and witness not only 1 but 2 great dynasties I used to just pop in a DVD of times like when the fat man Stewie Dew went beserk in 08 or Hodgeys banana in the 1st 1/4 last year....now I just open another beer and read threads like these first as it makes all those replays all the more enjoyable.
 
Essendon went into that game heavy favourites.
I remember how little chance people gave Brisbane, it made the loss all the more miserable, I was so convinced we'd win and I am naturally very Pessimistic
Sydney were heavy favourites
Umm, yeah... that worked well for them:
Scott Bamford (24 BL games)
John Barker (8 BL games)
Brad Boyd (15 BL games)
Nick Carter (5 BL games)
Shane Clayton (5 BL games)
Simon Hawking (0 BL games)
Chris Johnson (205 BL games)
Jarrod Molloy (51 BL games)

Only 1 player from Fitzroy was still on their list when they had their dynasty. Next fiction argument???
Johnson is really only player from Fitzroy's list that did anything. Although the merge meant Brisbane got access to Brown which they wouldn't have had
 
Hell, wish the OP just included a bloody poll.

Would look like this:
10% Brisbane (Brisbane supporters)
65% Brisbane (Neutral supporters)
20% Hawthorn (Hawthorn supporters)
5% Hawthorn (Neutral supporter... pressed wrong option by accident)

Theres been plenty of other posts and polls, but feel free to appoint yourself the arbiter of what everyone thinks
 
Both great teams, along with the Cats. Not sure why anybody seeks to separate them.

Tell you what though ... the Hawks have done an absolute number on the psyche of a lot of BF posters over the last few years. So much hurt.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Any objective analysis of the numbers says Hawthorn. Just look at the respective teams percentage (the best measure of how good a team is), looking at all 4 consecutive Grand Finals the respective two clubs played in.

Brisbane - 2001 127.6%
Brisbane - 2002 136.7%
Brisbane - 2003 121.9%
Brisbane - 2004 137.2%
Average percentage: 130.85%

Hawthorn 2012 154.6%
Hawthorn 2013 135.7%
Hawthorn 2014 140.8%
Hawthorn 2015 158.4%
Average percentage: 147.38

Hawthorn were clearly better over that four year era. It pains me to say it because I hate Hawthorn and like Brisbane, but Brisbane were never that good really. Just your standard run-of-the-mill excellent premiership team with a percentage of around 130-ish. Quite normal by premiership standards. There wasn't one year where Brisbane dominated the competition, and you though, "wow, this team is amazing." Port was just as good, if not better than Brisbane in all four of those years, with the possible exception of 2001.

Who was better than Hawthorn in their four years in any of those seasons? No one. Maybe Sydney in 2014 during the season. Maybe. But that's it. And even then you could argue both Hawthorn and Sydney were of the same quality in that year.

It's a bit of a stupid question, really. Brisbane never even finished on top of the ladder.
 
Last edited:
Are you serious? If you're going to try and sound intelligent, you might want to get your facts straight about how Lynch ended up at Brisbane via Fitzroy. Was never part of the players taken by the Brisbane Lions when Fitzroy was merged with them.

Should I include Martin Pike too then muppet? (That's if you were even aware of the fact that Pike played for Fitzroy. Probably not)


PS... I don't think the board would have accepted my vote to 'not merge' when I was aged 10, so to tar me as a 'pro merger' because I follow Melbourne is about as silly as me tarring you as a dumb campaigner for the simple fact that you support Hawthorn.

You said 'Hawks poached there players Brisbane built their own team'.

So get your facts straight flog, pro merger. You should go follow Brisbane if your happy for your club to vote itself out of existence.
 
Any objective analysis of the numbers says Hawthorn. Just look at the respective teams percentage (the best measure of how good a team is), looking at all 4 consecutive Grand Finals the respective two clubs played in.

Brisbane - 2001 127.6%
Brisbane - 2002 136.7%
Brisbane - 2003 121.9%
Brisbane - 2004 137.2%
Average percentage: 130.85%

Hawthorn 2012 154.6%
Hawthorn 2013 135.7%
Hawthorn 2014 140.8%
Hawthorn 2015 158.4%
Average percentage: 147.38

Hawthorn were clearly better over that four year era. It pains me to say it because I hate Hawthorn and like Brisbane, but Brisbane were never that good really. Just your standard run-of-the-mill excellent premiership team with a percentage of around 130-ish. Quite normal by premiership standards. There wasn't one year where Brisbane dominated the competition, and you though, "wow, this team is amazing." Port was just as good, if not better than Brisbane in all four of those years, with the possible exception of 2001.

Who was better than Hawthorn in their four years in any of those seasons? No one. Maybe Sydney in 2014 during the season. Maybe. But that's it. And even then you could argue both Hawthorn and Sydney were of the same quality in that year.

It's a bit of a stupid question, really. Brisbane never even finished on top of the ladder.
Well if you are going to use percentage, why not check the percentage against the best teams (i.e. in finals)? Brisbane were renowned for just aiming to stay healthy while making the top 4 and then backing themselves in the finals to win when it counts.

I've crunched the numbers for you;)
Brisbane Finals Percentage 2001-2004: 146%
Hawthorn Finals Percentage 2012-2015: 132%

So according to your method when it is time to walk the walk (Finals), Brisbane is comfortably ahead:thumbsu:
 
Well if you are going to use percentage, why not check the percentage against the best teams (i.e. in finals)? Brisbane were renowned for just aiming to stay healthy while making the top 4 and then backing themselves in the finals to win when it counts.

I've crunched the numbers for you;)
Brisbane Finals Percentage 2001-2004: 146%
Hawthorn Finals Percentage 2012-2015: 132%

So according to your method when it is time to walk the walk (Finals), Brisbane is comfortably ahead:thumbsu:

That's one way of looking at it. How about you crunch the numbers for the 4 grand finals then?

Brisbane Grand Final Percentage 2001-2004: 113.04%
Hawthorn Grand Final Percentage 2012-2015: 139.6%

Brisbane were not that good. Hawthorn was way better on virtually any measure. Anyone can see that, even a Hawks hater like me. Brisbane was nothing special (by premiership standards)
 
Stats will probably say Hawthorn but if the the two sides were to ever play each other Brisbane would of won comfortably. Better all round the ground. Lynch, Brown, Pike, Bradshaw up forward. Akermanis, Voss, Black, Power, Hart, Ashcroft, Lappin, Notting through the midfield, Mal Michael, Leppitsch, Scott Brothers, Johnson, White down back wow wee... I wish Hodge, Lewis, Rioli were as cocky or playing back then because they would have been put in there place very quickly :p
 
Brisbane easily.

Hawks just cruised through and never were the favourites in any of thier premiership years. Will be forgotten about soon enough.

The fact that they had no star players speaks volumes. A good, solid team but no real stand-outs.

Brisbane didn't finish on top of the ladder once during their 3 peat, so were they favourites in their premiership years?

You say we are a good, solid team, but it's precisely this unselfishness (whereby players sacrifice their own game to play their role) that's the reason behind our success. With that said you could form a fair highlights reel from the likes of Rioli, Burgoyne, Franklin, Hodge over the last few years, so we're far from bland.
 
That's one way of looking at it. How about you crunch the numbers for the 4 grand finals then?

Brisbane Grand Final Percentage 2001-2004: 113.04%
Hawthorn Grand Final Percentage 2012-2015: 139.6%

Brisbane were not that good. Hawthorn was way better on virtually any measure. Anyone can see that, even a Hawks hater like me. Brisbane was nothing special (by premiership standards)
That's a terrible sample to take, as it doesn't include any home games for the Lions.

Unless you are seriously suggesting a team should have a better percentage for games away from home?
 
We did it without free agency and had to travel interstate to beat our opponents on grand final day.

Hodge isn't fit to lick Voss's boots.

That's true, Voss is better then Hodge, but Sam Mitchell is better then Simon Black.

Look at Mitchell during this 30's and how well he's played and compare it to Black during his 30's.

Mitchell will be the games 2nd highest Brownlow vote getter of all-time by seasons end and likely to win another best & fairest award.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Brisbane or Hawthorn, the Better Three-peat?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top