- Banned
- #151
Re: McLean leaves Demons
This.
I'm a bit disappointed Collingwood didn't chase him TBH.
It is laughable that some people think Melbourne have somehow won out of this. It is undoubtedly due to Brock wanting to leave but it doesn't change the fact they have been completely ****ing stooped here.
Oh yeah, what a win for Melbourne, a future captain, top 5 draft pick, 5 years of development, proven performer at AFL level
= a six spot downgrade in a weak draft.
People overrate draft picks so much it isn't funny. Here you have a proven young talent at AFL level, now Melbourne set themselves back 5 years and restart it all again, except this time they are potentially going to come up with the next JON.
Travis Johnstone was worth pick 14, Ted Richards pick 19, Fergus Watts 17 and Nathan Lonie pick 14... Yet Melbourne's shining light, their best young midfielder and future leader is worth pick 11?
It is all well and good to get rid of an oldish Travis Johnstone in the hopes of bringing in some talented youth which Melbourne managed to do with Grimes, but trading talented youth to get that opportunity is hardly worth the risk.... It is a lucky dip more often than not.
What sort of precedent does it set? So now we can expect that after 5 years of developing this new kid Melbourne might be able to trade him off for say, pick 18 or 19? Would that be a win as well?
What an absolute rabble, hang your heads Melbourne, I dunno how you have managed it but Jesus, what a **** up.
Pick 11 for Brock McLean is an absolute bargain for Carlton. I don't know what on earth they're thinking at Melbourne. There is no way they will get the equivalent of McLean at 11 in this draft.
Terrible work by the list management people at Melbourne (unless they're hands were tied - was Brock uncontracted ?) and as much as I hate to admit it, kudos to Greg Swann at Carlton.
This.
I'm a bit disappointed Collingwood didn't chase him TBH.
It is laughable that some people think Melbourne have somehow won out of this. It is undoubtedly due to Brock wanting to leave but it doesn't change the fact they have been completely ****ing stooped here.
Oh yeah, what a win for Melbourne, a future captain, top 5 draft pick, 5 years of development, proven performer at AFL level
= a six spot downgrade in a weak draft.
People overrate draft picks so much it isn't funny. Here you have a proven young talent at AFL level, now Melbourne set themselves back 5 years and restart it all again, except this time they are potentially going to come up with the next JON.
Travis Johnstone was worth pick 14, Ted Richards pick 19, Fergus Watts 17 and Nathan Lonie pick 14... Yet Melbourne's shining light, their best young midfielder and future leader is worth pick 11?
It is all well and good to get rid of an oldish Travis Johnstone in the hopes of bringing in some talented youth which Melbourne managed to do with Grimes, but trading talented youth to get that opportunity is hardly worth the risk.... It is a lucky dip more often than not.
What sort of precedent does it set? So now we can expect that after 5 years of developing this new kid Melbourne might be able to trade him off for say, pick 18 or 19? Would that be a win as well?
What an absolute rabble, hang your heads Melbourne, I dunno how you have managed it but Jesus, what a **** up.