Brownlow Medal 2010 (Part 2)

[AjsGuns]

He wasn't in the centrebet group of dogs players so hopefully he is big odds with TAB. Well that's your opinion, I actually have Boyd, Cooney, Griffen and Giansiarcusa all within 3 votes of each other with Griffen leading on 13.

I think Cooney will take it i have him 4 ahead of griff + cooney can poll for doing basically nothing, worth putting a few dollars on griff i guess but i cant see him winning it. I have Boyd 1 behind Cooney

is anyone watching melb vs north, swallow playing ok as i can see in the stats

all handballs tho

Swallow is BOG to 1/2 his been so smooth barely had a clanger has kicked 2 goals and had 17 possies and a few tackles.

 

[mike262]

What is everyones opinion on ablett being a anchor for geelong now. Surely he has it wrapped up after his BOG yesterday?

 

[AjsGuns]

What is everyones opinion on ablett being a anchor for geelong now. Surely he has it wrapped up after his BOG yesterday?

He was at $1.30 after his BOG he will be into $1.20 Selwood wud be a 35% to beat him, would you want to risk it? Far from a anchor..

 

[superbadass]

Fantastic work by everyone on here guys, just have a quick question. For someone who lives in WA, what online agencies offer the option to multi team votes together and which do you reccomend?

 

[mike262]

^None atm.

Hopefully the TAB 2morrow

 

[maxlad]

Fantastic work by everyone on here guys, just have a quick question. For someone who lives in WA, what online agencies offer the option to multi team votes together and which do you reccomend?

nah they all had a cry about last year and none are doing them this year

 

[superbadass]

^None atm.

Hopefully the TAB 2morrow

And if they dont then were screwed? Man why do i live in Perth

 

[twarby]

And if they dont then were screwed? Man why do i live in Perth

what does perth have to do it with it?

not the end of the world if they dont

 

[jimbob7085]

Will post my leaderboard straight after the North/Melb game and top 3 club leaders. What does everyone think of these multis? I think they're pretty safe but would like to hear others opinions.

Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Hayes @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Barlow @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 158
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Hayes @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Barlow @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Pendlebury @ 881
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Hayes @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Barlow @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Hayes @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Barlow @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Pendlebury @ 1030

The odds are approximated according to my memory of the players odds last round and how much I htikn their odds will increase/decrease.

 

[mike262]

And if they dont then were screwed? Man why do i live in Perth

if perth dont get them it will be because the rest of australia also doesnt get them.

 

[PatrickBateman]

Will post my leaderboard straight after the North/Melb game and top 3 club leaders. What does everyone think of these multis? I think they're pretty safe but would like to hear others opinions.

Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Hayes @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Barlow @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 158
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Hayes @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Barlow @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Pendlebury @ 881
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Hayes @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Barlow @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Hayes @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Barlow @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Pendlebury @ 1030

The odds are approximated according to my memory of the players odds last round and how much I htikn their odds will increase/decrease.

There has been more than enough talked about on this thread concerning all the players in your multis... Go back and have a look.

 

[AG]

Votes from Greenwood, Harvey, Swallow, McDonald and Green. Maybe Scully and Dunn.

 

[lions_den]

Will post my leaderboard straight after the North/Melb game and top 3 club leaders. What does everyone think of these multis? I think they're pretty safe but would like to hear others opinions.

Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Hayes @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Barlow @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 158
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Hayes @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Barlow @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Pendlebury @ 881
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Hayes @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Barlow @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Hayes @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Barlow @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Pendlebury @ 1030

The odds are approximated according to my memory of the players odds last round and how much I htikn their odds will increase/decrease.

I like it (apart from pendles).

 

[AjsGuns]

Votes from Greenwood, Harvey, Swallow, McDonald and Green. Maybe Scully and Dunn.

Agreed hard game swallow faded away harvey smashed the last qtr would go:

3. Greenwood
2. Green
1. Harvey

Swallow a chance to take the 1.

 

[Mudeo]

Will post my leaderboard straight after the North/Melb game and top 3 club leaders. What does everyone think of these multis? I think they're pretty safe but would like to hear others opinions.

Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Hayes @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Barlow @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 158
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Hayes @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Barlow @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Pendlebury @ 881
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Hayes @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Barlow @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Hayes @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Barlow @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Pendlebury @ 1030

The odds are approximated according to my memory of the players odds last round and how much I htikn their odds will increase/decrease.

That looks solid, dont understand why you have Cassisi and Boak as your 50-50 tho, Rodan seems a chance to win Ports count. So wouldn't you rather have a team like NM or Sydney who have players that are a certain 50% to take out their clubs most votes?

 

[s1bbald]

Will post my leaderboard straight after the North/Melb game and top 3 club leaders. What does everyone think of these multis? I think they're pretty safe but would like to hear others opinions.

Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Hayes @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Barlow @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 158
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Hayes @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Barlow @ 1028
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Cassisi - Jack - Pendlebury @ 881
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Hayes @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Barlow @ 216
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Goodes - Pendlebury @ 185
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Hayes @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Barlow @ 1200
Watson - Thompson - Brown - Boak - Jack - Pendlebury @ 1030

The odds are approximated according to my memory of the players odds last round and how much I htikn their odds will increase/decrease.

Hey mate, ignore Patrick. A lot of us are happy to provide feedback. I really like this, quite possibly better than mine. What I would suggest is doing the Watson-Thompson-Brown-Cassisi/Boak-Jack/Goodes series of four combinations at increased units, just in case Barlow, Hayes or Pendlebury doesn't get up.

 

[Athomas]

Agreed hard game swallow faded away harvey smashed the last qtr would go:

3. Greenwood
2. Green
1. Harvey

Swallow a chance to take the 1.

Very hard.

I've gone
3. Greenwood
2. Harvey
1. Green/Swallow


Not too sure, can all 4 poll please.

 

[Effes]

I think Harvey will definitely poll with such a big last quarter and that goal he banged through running through the middle.

Greenwood should get the 3 but for a second or third year player I think it's really hard for them to be rewarded by the umpires.

 

[Notorious_29]

3. Harvey
2. McDonald
1. Greenwood

 

[AG]

Hopefully it's a good count and it should be closer than last year. I had 192 players poll votes this season. I've shown the breakdown for all players 10 votes and above.

 

[twarby]

3. Harvey
2. McDonald
1. Greenwood

i agree that Mcdonald is a chance for votes, 2 would see him on 9 for my count
does anyone else have him around that mark? would make melbourne a 3way race for me.

Greenwood
Harvey
Green

 

[twarby]

Hopefully it's a good count and it should be closer than last year. I had 192 players poll votes this season. I've shown the breakdown for all players 10 votes and above.

you have Lenny on 22 in one pic, 19 in other?

 

[mike262]

like aussiegun count

except for brisbane and richmond

I have brown/riewoldt leading

 

[lions_den]

Hopefully it's a good count and it should be closer than last year. I had 192 players poll votes this season. I've shown the breakdown for all players 10 votes and above.

Cheers for all the effort you've put in this year.

 

[AG]

you have Lenny on 22 in one pic, 19 in other?

I knew I'd make a mistake. I have him on 19. The 3rd image will be the right one. I did the club leaderboard today and just copied the figures, so there might be another error somewhere. I'll double check them.