Certified Legendary Thread Cam Rayner

Remove this Banner Ad

Raynor has looked really dangerous at times. But flaky (sort of). Not quite producing what he is capable of. I suspect he'll get fitter, smarter and step up quite a lot. At his best he can be an A grade player. I suspect he'll be a bit below that. But you can see why he went so high. Buckets of talent, just something not quite there ... yet.
 
First to address your earlier post. It's really easy to cherry pick stats. But these are the ones that tell a full story.

2021 Pickett:
Forward 50 Ground Ball Gets - 3rd in League.
Tackles inside 50m: 2nd in League
Pressure Acts: 21st in League

2020 Rayner:
Forward 50 Ground Ball Gets - 207th in League.
Tackles inside 50m: 62nd in League
Pressure Acts: 104th in League


With regards to your order, I think it's obvious now that you're trolling. No-one in their right mind is going to have Raynor before Fritsch. lol wtf. lol.

Then the audacity to put Ed Richards before Fritsch. At this stage, we can't be taking this seriously.

You're picking the guys like Uniacke, Paton, Clarke, DeKoning, Rayner over Fritsch is absolute blasphemy. Fritsch gets marked down because he's 2 years older. Petracca aside, the guy is a norm smith medallist, 59 goals a year goal kicker and your putting scrubs that could very well be delisted in the next 3 seasons.

Totally disrespectful and am not sure whether you're being serious or not. Would you put Zac Bailey before Bontempelli because Bont is 2 years older too? Dude. I don't like shooting down opinions but a lot of the guys you rate, you like because they're young and you don't place any value on the fact that they've been scrubs for the first few years and then when you've got one of the best players in the league who disregard it because he is 2 years older. That's a really flawed way of assessing players.

Most of the guys on your list above Fritsch have shown maybe 5% of what Fritsch has ALREADY done.

There is no logical reason that Rayner belongs in the top 20. Like how on earth is Rayner above Spargo? In what world has Rayner shown more than Spargo.

Says it is really easy to cherry pick stats….then proves it. 😂. You gotta love someone who supports their arguments with irrefutable evidence. 😍

Do you really think your handpicked trio of stats tell "the full story?” Hmmmm.

In any event, I don’t know why you should be so outraged about my post as I had already said on the thread that I rated Rayner around pick 10 value and Fritsch in the low teens and already explained why, and you had already responded to these points. You have committed to your own assessment. You are entitled to question my ratings but I steadfastly refuse to allow you to be shocked by learning something you already knew. 😂

In my post I explained fully my criteria and it is different to yours, so it is for sure that alone will lead us to different ratings. You didn’t state it but it seems evident you are re-ordering the draft as at end of season 2017. I am placing values on the players as at the end of season 2022. So age is obviously going to be more of a factor in my ratings than yours, how could it not be? Would you change your order at all if you used my criteria?

Your use of hysterically dramatic language like “no-one in their right mind would…” “audacity” “blasphemy” “totally disrespectful” “no logical reason” “how on earth” and “in what world” are like music to my eyes. 😁. If you repeat them over and over they are sort of mesmeric, poetic, and they have a type of rythm to them. Thus:

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

You have such a gift for words, just beautiful. 😁


All will be told in time danster168. We have our ratings and rankings to refer back to. One thing I know for certain is my ratings will be wrong. As will yours. It just remains to be seen who is more wrong. 😁

But let this be known: you are giving up pick 4 for a man who gets 10 disposals and 2.6 goals + goals assists per game playing mainly as the deepest forward in a Premiership team. 😱. Pick 4 for a player whose best year so far puts him around the indicated level of around 20 other players in similar roles. 😁. And pick 18 for Chuck Spargo, a disciplined small forward of no special note. 😱. I love your faith in your players. 😁

Recent history of pick 4: N Daicos, L McDonald, L Ash, M King, L Uniacke, B Ainsworth, C Oliver, J Pickett, M Bontempelli, J Toumpass, W Hoskin-Elliott, A Gaff.

Pick 18’s include: Georgiades, Duursma, Gresham, Heeney, Brodie Grundy, Shuey, Rance, Daniel Kerr since 2000.

So, pick 4 for Fritsch and pick 18 for Spargo…..

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

😂😂😂😂
 
Last edited:
Still laughing at anyone thinking Raynor would be worth Fritsch in a trade.

I can't think of a single Melbourne Demon best 22 I'd let go for Cam Raynor. Jaidyn Hunt is better than that FRAUD.

I liked the idea of taking Rayner over Liam Ryan.

Ryan has done more with his little finger, than Rayner has done with his whole body.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Says it is really easy to cherry pick stats….then proves it. 😂. You gotta love someone who supports their arguments with irrefutable evidence. 😍

Do you really think your handpicked trio of stats tell "the full story?” Hmmmm.

In any event, I don’t know why you should be so outraged about my post as I had already said on the thread that I rated Rayner around pick 10 value and Fritsch in the low teens and already explained why, and you had already responded to these points. You have committed to your own assessment. You are entitled to question my ratings but I sreadfastly refuse to allow you to be shocked by learning something you already knew. 😂

In my post I explained fully my criteria and it is different to yours, so it is for sure that alone will lead us to different ratings. You didn’t state it but it seems evident you are re-ordering the draft as at end of season 2017. I am placing values on the players as at the end of season 2022. So age is obviously going to be more of a factor in my ratings than yours, how could it not be? Would you change your order at all if you used my criteria?

Your use of hysterically dramatic language like “no-one in their right mind would…” “audacity” “blasphemy” “totally disrespectful” “no logical reason” “how on earth” and “in what world” are like music to my eyes. 😁. If you repeat them over and over they are sort of mesmeric, poetic, and they have a type of rythm to them. Thus:

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

You have such a gift for words, just beautiful. 😁


All will be told in time danster168. We have our ratings and rankings to refer back to. One thing I know for certain is my ratings will be wrong. As will yours. It just remains to be seen who is more wrong. 😁

But let this be known: you are giving up pick 4 for a man who gets 10 disposals and 2.6 goals + goals assists per game playing mainly as the deepest forward in a Premiership team. 😱. Pick 4 for a player whose best year so far puts him around the indicated level of around 20 other players in similar roles. 😁. And pick 18 for Chuck Spargo, a disciplined small forward of no special note. 😱. I love your faith in your players. 😁

Recent history of pick 4: N Daicos, L McDonald, L Ash, M King, L Uniacke, B Ainsworth, C Oliver, J Pickett, M Bontempelli, J Toumpass, W Hoskin-Elliott, A Gaff.

Pick 18’s include: Georgiades, Duursma, Gresham, Heeney, Brodie Grundy, Shuey, Rance, Daniel Kerr since 2000.

So, pick 4 for Fritsch and pick 18 for Spargo…..

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

audacity, blasphemy, totally disrepectful, no logical reason(spoken with emphasis then pause) how on earth, no-one in their right mind would, in what world(in a plaintive strain).

😂😂😂😂
You based the fact that you rated Rayner more than Fritsch because Rayner is younger. That's all you said. Nothing he's done on field. All hype and speculation. He is basically a far worse version of Colin Sylvia.

For you to be correct, Rayner would have to be a multiple All-Australian and have multiple years of 50 goals plus. He will also have to produced in finals on the big stage with best on ground performances. The odds of him doing this are 0%. Not 10%, not 5% but 0%. The odds of him being delisted or traded within 3 seasons for pick 50+ is probably about 50%. You're also happy to keep giving Rayner more and more time even though you mark Fritsch down because he is older. So assuming Rayner does nothing this season, he would have produced 0 poor AFL seasons and Fritsch would likely have produced 4 good seasons and 1 elite season. So that's 5 years of production before Rayner even plays AFL standard footy. He can't catch that up. So time won't tell, it's already told.

Not sure what you're raving on about Pick 4 for? Yeah pick 4 for a guy that kicked the 2nd most games in the AFL last season and 6 in a granny which hasn't been done for 20 years. Why are talking about playing as a deep forward or not? Yeah, so is Tom Hawkins what's your point? And you're using stats from 4 games of footy instead of a whole season that's just passed. lol. how convenient. Shall we pull up Rayner's stats from the first 4 rounds? :)

Tell me, how many players kicked 59 goals or more? You say 20? Go on, list them!

Also what's your obsession with Melbourne being a premiership team? You know we're a premiership team because of our defence? And the reason why we are a premiership team is because Fritsch went nuts in the finals like a clutch player. We kicked like the 6th most goals of any team last year. So it's not like we kicked many goals like you were alluding to.

Also out of those pick 4's, Fritsch is better than Luke Mcdonald, Ash, Uniacke, Ainsworth, Pickett, Toumpas, Hoskin-Elliott and Gaff. So not sure why you listed them.

You undid all of your good work when you said Ed Richards was one of the best prospects in the AFL. LOL. ED RICHARDS!.
 
Cam wouldn’t be top 15 in a redraft today unfortunately.

Still think it might change in a few years. He can do some pretty freakish things on a footy field and I think he will start getting it together.

Him not being like the number 1 picks of recent years hurts a little less knowing we snagged Zac Bailey at a pick in the teens. Swings and roundabouts.

He is nowhere near as good as Fritsch.
 
You based the fact that you rated Rayner more than Fritsch because Rayner is younger. That's all you said. Nothing he's done on field. All hype and speculation. He is basically a far worse version of Colin Sylvia.

For you to be correct, Rayner would have to be a multiple All-Australian and have multiple years of 50 goals plus. He will also have to produced in finals on the big stage with best on ground performances. The odds of him doing this are 0%. Not 10%, not 5% but 0%. The odds of him being delisted or traded within 3 seasons for pick 50+ is probably about 50%. You're also happy to keep giving Rayner more and more time even though you mark Fritsch down because he is older. So assuming Rayner does nothing this season, he would have produced 0 poor AFL seasons and Fritsch would likely have produced 4 good seasons and 1 elite season. So that's 5 years of production before Rayner even plays AFL standard footy. He can't catch that up. So time won't tell, it's already told.

Not sure what you're raving on about Pick 4 for? Yeah pick 4 for a guy that kicked the 2nd most games in the AFL last season and 6 in a granny which hasn't been done for 20 years. Why are talking about playing as a deep forward or not? Yeah, so is Tom Hawkins what's your point? And you're using stats from 4 games of footy instead of a whole season that's just passed. lol. how convenient. Shall we pull up Rayner's stats from the first 4 rounds? :)

Tell me, how many players kicked 59 goals or more? You say 20? Go on, list them!

Also what's your obsession with Melbourne being a premiership team? You know we're a premiership team because of our defence? And the reason why we are a premiership team is because Fritsch went nuts in the finals like a clutch player. We kicked like the 6th most goals of any team last year. So it's not like we kicked many goals like you were alluding to.

Also out of those pick 4's, Fritsch is better than Luke Mcdonald, Ash, Uniacke, Ainsworth, Pickett, Toumpas, Hoskin-Elliott and Gaff. So not sure why you listed them.

You undid all of your good work when you said Ed Richards was one of the best prospects in the AFL. LOL. ED RICHARDS!.

With all due respect, your post is gibberish that barely relates to any of my posts in any meaningful way. Happy to discuss the points I have made but not so much the points you would like me to have made.

In summary though….

To be better than Fritsch under my plainly stated criteria, Rayner would just need to be a more valuable player than Fritsch from next year onwards. I am confident this will be the case, not certain, but confident. I am supremely confident however that Rayner will prove a more valuable player than Colin Sylvia R.I.P. from next year onwards. 😎

The reason I referred to pick 4 is because you have Fritsch at pick 4 in your re-ordered 2017 draft. That is, from the 2017 draft, you think only Brayshaw, Naughton and Tim Kelly will prove to be better over their careers than Fritsch. For the record I think this is incorrect even by your unstated criteria, quite aside from the fact I used a very different criteria to re-rate my 2017 draft class.

Just to be clear, here are the 6 Fritsch Grand Final goals that have danster168 frothing at the mouth in excitement…stunning highlights package this. 😱. I am going to guess his 4th was your favourite danster, because it was mine, excellent piece of play, displaying timing, balance, ball handling etc. Tell me though, which was his second best goal in your esteemed opinion? My second favourite was his first. You know, the one that was going to be a goal if he simply left it. 😁 And who was your favourite opponent he played on? Fringe player Williams, who seemed to have trouble not dropping uncontested marks straight into Fritsch’s lap? VFL player Josh Schache? Perhaps 32yo injury prone retiree Easton Wood?



Now, Fritsch played very well, took his chances etc, but I am not copping this is evidence he is any more than a 2.6 goals + goal assists, 10 disposal forward, of which at any given time there are roughly 20 or more in the AFL, as I have shown.

My final point is I am happy to back Ed Richards to be the 12th best player from the 2017 draft crop from 2023 onwards. I don’t resile from that.

You have your ways of rating players and teams and I have mine. I remember copping some flak on here because I was very bullish on the Demons future prospects in 2020, and said I rated Christian Petracca the most valuable player in the game, over Martin etc etc. So it is nothing new to me. You stick to predicting the past, and leave me to predict the future friend. 😎
 
Last edited:
From that list, 22yo Rayner would have a higher trade value than:

25yo 188cm hybrid forward Bailey Fritsch.

192cm Key Forward Oscar Allen.

Rising 28yo Tim Kelly.

IMO. And it is yet to be determined where Rayner’s value ultimately sits in relation to the rest of that list, but I accept that right now probably all of those would fetch a higher price on the market.

From the first line "Rayner would have a higher trade value than:..."
to the last " I accept that right now probably all of those would fetch a higher price on the market"

This is my new favourite BF post ever
 
With all due respect, your post is gibberish that barely relates to any of my posts in any meaningful way. Happy to discuss the points I have made but not so much the points you would like me to have made.

In summary though….

To be better than Fritsch under my plainly stated criteria, Rayner would just need to be a more valuable player than Fritsch from next year onwards. I am confident this will be the case, not certain, but confident. I am supremely confident however that Rayner will prove a more valuable player than Colin Sylvia R.I.P. from next year onwards. 😎

The reason I referred to pick 4 is because you have Fritsch at pick 4 in your re-ordered 2017 draft. That is, from the 2017 draft, you think only Brayshaw, Naughton and Tim Kelly will prove to be better over their careers than Fritsch. For the record I think this is incorrect even by your unstated criteria, quite aside from the fact I used a very different criteria to re-rate my 2017 draft class.

Just to be clear, here are the 6 Fritsch Grand Final goals that have danster168 frothing at the mouth in excitement…stunning highlights package this. 😱. I am going to guess his 4th was your favourite danster, because it was mine, excellent piece of play, displaying timing, balance, ball handling etc. Tell me though, which was his second best goal in your esteemed opinion? And who was your favourite opponent he played on? Fringe player Williams, who seemed to have trouble not dropping uncontested marks straight into Fritsch’s lap? VFL player Josh Schache? Perhaps 32yo injury prone retiree Easton Wood?



Now, Fritsch played very well, took his chances etc, but I am not copping this is evidence he is any more than a 2.6 goals + goal assists, 10 disposal forward, of which at any given time there are roughly 20 or more in the AFL, as I have shown.

My final point is I am happy to back Ed Richards to be the 12th best player from the 2017 draft crop from 2023 onwards. I don’t resile from that.

You have your ways of rating players and teams and I have mine. I remember copping some flak on here because I was very bullish on the Demons future prospects in 2020, and said I rated Christian Petracca the most valuable player in the game, over Martin etc etc. So it is nothing new to me. You stick to predicting the past, and leave me to predict the future friend. 😎


Ed Richards ? Terrible footballer likely to be put on the trading block by the Dogs at season's end
 
Cam wouldn’t be top 15 in a redraft today unfortunately.

Still think it might change in a few years. He can do some pretty freakish things on a footy field and I think he will start getting it together.

Him not being like the number 1 picks of recent years hurts a little less knowing we snagged Zac Bailey at a pick in the teens. Swings and roundabouts.

He is nowhere near as good as Fritsch.
Would you accept a second rounder?
 
From the first line "Rayner would have a higher trade value than:..."
to the last " I accept that right now probably all of those would fetch a higher price on the market"

This is my new favourite BF post ever

You misunderstand the post. The last line is not referring to the three players listed in my post, but the balance of a list of 11 players including those 3 from danster’s earlier post, which we were discussing before you rudely interrupted. 😂

For the record danster asked me which on his list of 11 had less trade value than Rayner in order that I rated Rayner worth pick 10. I listed 3 to whom I thought this might apply.
 
You misunderstand the post. The last line is not referring to the three players listed in my post, but the balance of a list of 11 players including those 3 from danster’s earlier post, which we were discussing before you rudely interrupted. 😂

For the record danster asked me which on his list of 11 had less trade value than Rayner in order that I rated Rayner worth pick 10. I listed 3 to whom I thought this might apply.

That's part of the reason I like it so much.

Only on BF...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

With all due respect, your post is gibberish that barely relates to any of my posts in any meaningful way. Happy to discuss the points I have made but not so much the points you would like me to have made.

In summary though….

To be better than Fritsch under my plainly stated criteria, Rayner would just need to be a more valuable player than Fritsch from next year onwards. I am confident this will be the case, not certain, but confident. I am supremely confident however that Rayner will prove a more valuable player than Colin Sylvia R.I.P. from next year onwards. 😎

The reason I referred to pick 4 is because you have Fritsch at pick 4 in your re-ordered 2017 draft. That is, from the 2017 draft, you think only Brayshaw, Naughton and Tim Kelly will prove to be better over their careers than Fritsch. For the record I think this is incorrect even by your unstated criteria, quite aside from the fact I used a very different criteria to re-rate my 2017 draft class.

Just to be clear, here are the 6 Fritsch Grand Final goals that have danster168 frothing at the mouth in excitement…stunning highlights package this. 😱. I am going to guess his 4th was your favourite danster, because it was mine, excellent piece of play, displaying timing, balance, ball handling etc. Tell me though, which was his second best goal in your esteemed opinion? My second favourite was his first. You know, the one that was going to be a goal if he simply left it. 😁 And who was your favourite opponent he played on? Fringe player Williams, who seemed to have trouble not dropping uncontested marks straight into Fritsch’s lap? VFL player Josh Schache? Perhaps 32yo injury prone retiree Easton Wood?



Now, Fritsch played very well, took his chances etc, but I am not copping this is evidence he is any more than a 2.6 goals + goal assists, 10 disposal forward, of which at any given time there are roughly 20 or more in the AFL, as I have shown.

My final point is I am happy to back Ed Richards to be the 12th best player from the 2017 draft crop from 2023 onwards. I don’t resile from that.

You have your ways of rating players and teams and I have mine. I remember copping some flak on here because I was very bullish on the Demons future prospects in 2020, and said I rated Christian Petracca the most valuable player in the game, over Martin etc etc. So it is nothing new to me. You stick to predicting the past, and leave me to predict the future friend. 😎

lol that is one deranged post. the guy kicked 59 goals in a season haha. 2nd most in the afl across a large sample size. The proof is already there, it's up to you if you want to ignore the evidence. And I don't care how many disposals he gets. He's not a midfielder lol. You know he made the AA squad yeah? you know this? lol. He was also voted 2nd in the norm smith medal. Lucky you're not voting! You also didn't answer my question, which players in the AFL can produce a 59 goal season? Of that, how many of them are medium forwards? I'd say none. Fritsch is the best medium forward in the league.

Why is it Fritsch's fault that he gets separation on his opponent? The dogs couldn't have played anyone else on him. Too tall for Duryea, too nimble for Wood. That's literally why he's a tough match up.

And can you explain your logic of giving all this scrubs so many years until saying that they are better than Fritsch or not? Let's say all of Richards, Raynor and Fritsch play til 30. Raynor and Richards have been scrubs for the their first 4-5 years. Why are you not subtracting this from their total value? Fritsch has been really good from his first season. By the time Raynor produces Fritsch would've been playing good footy for 6 years. So Rayner would need to produce a Buddy Franklin type season or would have to outperform Fritsch for about 5 years to make up for the lost ground.

For arguments sake, if Rayner or Richards do produce AA quality football, they'd need to do it for about 3 years straight to make up for the lost years of junk football. That's where you've failed to acknowledge.

But lets be serious here, Rayner hasn't even outperformed Spargo yet who has been a regular 22 player in a premiership player and has been amazing at applying forward half pressure, something Rayner has been horrific at. You also failed to address the stats that I showcased that showed Rayner is one of the worst forward 50m players in the AFL when it comes to pressure acts, tackles and getting to ground balls in the forward 50m. Can you please give me a reason for this horrible performance? Can you also explain why Pickett is one of the best in the AFL for these categories and why you deliberately left this out to suit your argument.
 
No. You were the one saying he wasn’t a top 15 player in the draft.

I’m guessing that if he wanted out you’d be one of the first posters saying that he was worth a very early pick.
 
lol that is one deranged post. the guy kicked 59 goals in a season haha. 2nd most in the afl across a large sample size. The proof is already there, it's up to you if you want to ignore the evidence. And I don't care how many disposals he gets. He's not a midfielder lol. You know he made the AA squad yeah? you know this? lol. He was also voted 2nd in the norm smith medal. Lucky you're not voting! You also didn't answer my question, which players in the AFL can produce a 59 goal season? Of that, how many of them are medium forwards? I'd say none. Fritsch is the best medium forward in the league.

Why is it Fritsch's fault that he gets separation on his opponent? The dogs couldn't have played anyone else on him. Too tall for Duryea, too nimble for Wood. That's literally why he's a tough match up.

And can you explain your logic of giving all this scrubs so many years until saying that they are better than Fritsch or not? Let's say all of Richards, Raynor and Fritsch play til 30. Raynor and Richards have been scrubs for the their first 4-5 years. Why are you not subtracting this from their total value? Fritsch has been really good from his first season. By the time Raynor produces Fritsch would've been playing good footy for 6 years. So Rayner would need to produce a Buddy Franklin type season or would have to outperform Fritsch for about 5 years to make up for the lost ground.

For arguments sake, if Rayner or Richards do produce AA quality football, they'd need to do it for about 3 years straight to make up for the lost years of junk football. That's where you've failed to acknowledge.

But lets be serious here, Rayner hasn't even outperformed Spargo yet who has been a regular 22 player in a premiership player and has been amazing at applying forward half pressure, something Rayner has been horrific at. You also failed to address the stats that I showcased that showed Rayner is one of the worst forward 50m players in the AFL when it comes to pressure acts, tackles and getting to ground balls in the forward 50m. Can you please give me a reason for this horrible performance? Can you also explain why Pickett is one of the best in the AFL for these categories and why you deliberately left this out to suit your argument.

2021

Fritsch 7th in AFL for goal average.

OK, that is pretty good, he must be a star right? Wrong.

Fritsch equal 297th for goal assists. Equal 297th with 11 other players. Such goal assist luminaries as Tom Hickey, Ryan Burton, Nic Newman and Atu Bosenavulagi.

What does this tell us? Fritsch is not instrumental in setting up goals, he is set up to convert the good work of others up the field. He is set up to get most of Melbourne’s Joe the goose goals. He finished exactly 11th in Melbourne’s Best and Fairest Award. 11th in his best season ever. So if he had such a stellar season, why does he not even finish top 10 in the B & F? The answer is because he was not considered in Melbourne’s top 10 performers. That does not make you elite.

OK, so maybe it is tough for forwards to get votes? Wrong. Fellow specialist forwards Kysaiah Pickett, Alex Neal-Bullen and Tom McDonald were considered in the top 10 performing players for the season. Why? Because Fritsch does little more than get on the end of their good work. Maybe the field was just so hot in a Premiership year? Wrong. Fritsch got 12th in 2020. He did manage to finish 6th for the wooden spoon runner-up in 2019 though. So this “gun from day 1” has one single top 10 B & F finish, in a team that finished 17th, when he was one of only 11 players to play 19 games or more - he played all 22.

Fritsch finished ahead of one single regular full time Melbourne forward in the 2021 B & F award. You guessed it, Chuck Spargo, the man you ranked 18th best of the 2017 draft crop.

Judging by AFL official rankings he was the 131st highest ranked player in 2021 and the 18th ranked forward. They had him as Melbourne’s 3rd ranked forward, not 4th like the Demons themselves did. So the AFL ratings have elevated Fritsch just above Pickett(134th,) where Melbourne themselves rated Pickett better. So the ratings are very closely aligned with the Melbourne B & F results.

Fritsch plays his assigned role well and is a good player, but you are rating him one of the best few forwards in the AFL where the club doesn’t even rate him in their top 3 forwards in his best season. So stop it. Fritsch is not an elite forward. He is not the best medium forward in the AFL. Toby Greene for example is a miles better player. Charlie Cameron plays a not dissimilar role is a better performer. Jake Stringer is better. de Goey is better. Martin is better. Petracca is better. Heeney is better, Gunston, Breust, and so on. Those guys are elite level players, not Bailey Fritsch. No AFL club is giving up a top 10 pick for Bailey Fritsch.

None of this is any shame on Bailey Fritsch, he is a good player. But it is why I have rated him where I have and why you rating him the 4th best player in his draft is a nonsense.

You just have to stop it with your 1970’s goal stats rubbish about Fritsch. Nobody misunderstands football like that any more.
 
Last edited:
Ok let’s have a go at re-rating the best of the 2017 draft. I will apply one simple criteria to my ratings, what draft pick/s would I be prepared to part with to trade these players in to my notional team at the end of season 2022 as things stand. I will assume each player fully fit and at his best, and not affected by past injuries. I will rate all of your guys plus the following:

Dow, O’Brien, Clark, Coffield, Bonar, D Fogarty, Brander, Ed Richards, L Fogarty, Coleman-Jones, De Koning, Petrucelle, McPherson, Ballard, Farrell, Z Langdon, H Jones, Amartey, Miller, L Murphy, who I think all can possibly make AFL regular players yet.

The figure to the left is where I rank them in this field, the figure to the right is the pick I would give up for them. If I wouldn’t trade a top 50 pick for them this is left blank.

1 Brayshaw - looks a fairly complete mid. Pick 2
2 Naughton - brilliant KPP, best of this group. Like to see improve set shots. Pick 2

3 Balta - adaptable KPP and second ruck, has huge weapons. Pick 3

4 Sam Taylor - class Key defender already. Pick 5
5 Cerra - always tracked a bit below Brayshaw but looks a strong mid Pick 5

After that there is a bit of a gap from what I have seen so far.

6 Bailey - Lions were right onto this bloke. Wing, mid, half back, small forward all look within his capabilities. Pick 8
7 Clark - in between getting hurt has shown good ability at half back and mid. Pick 8
8 Uniacke - shown just enough to suggest he can be a strong mid, good weapons. Pick 8

9. Rayner - his potential is strong enough that I couldn’t place him lower in this field. Pick 10

10. Allen - Really tidy undersized KPP. I feel he is over-rated a bit but I still rate him highly, loved his work in defence. Pick 12
11 McCartin - another very good KPP. Pick 12.

I have another gap here.

12. Ed Richards - will surprise some, but been watching him closely, he is getting stronger, is fast and good disposal. Not sure his best position yet. Pick 15
13 Paton - was killing them before his massive injury. Gets back to his best he is well worth this rating. Pick 15
14 de Koning - disappointed in him this year but still expect him to be a strong ruck/forward as he fills out. Pick 15

15. Ryan - I think he would do better in a different team where he is targetted more, or there are more loose balls so this could even be a bit low. Pick 18
16. Fritsch - Class hybrid forward, would be around pick 10 as would Ryan above but both are 2 years older than this group so marked down. Pick 18
17. Petty - Very impressed 2021 but want to see a bit more in different situations. At worst a really solid 2nd KPD Pick 18
18. Dylan Moore - Seems to be rapidly rising through the ranks now, looking a very accomplished player. Pick 18
19. Ballard - Maturing 2nd KPD or intercept marker. Has been attending a tough school, but he can stand up to it now. Pick 18

20. Switkowski - I like this bloke. Looks like a dog’s breakfast but he can really play. Pick 20
21. Powell - Possibly a bit low. Another very tidy footballer who will have a good career. Pick 20
22. Baker - Tiny, but too tough and skilled to be any lower. Marked down slightly as a year older than most of this group. Pick 20
23. Daniels - Gone off the radar slightly with injury but like how he is shaping. Pick 20

24. Ainsworth - also been in a difficult college but is a very decent player. Pick 22

I see another gap here.

25. Higgins - Might be under-rating him. Got plenty going for him. Tiny though and queries on his team first intent. Pick 25
26. Kelly - Class player but at 28 his trade value is diminished with most of his best years spent. Pick 25
27. Starcevich - good player, strong, good disposal. Not sure about his speed and running ability. Pick 25
28. Coleman-Jones - confidence probably a bit shot at the moment, but should play plenty of AFL footy and capable of filling a very useful role. Pick 25
29. Xerri - I rate this guy from what I have seen, unsure if he can become a really good player but will always be competitive. Pick 25
30. Spargo - solid small forward, always team first. Decent skills. Worth at least this pick, but not a world beater. Pick 25.

After this I think we are getting into speculative players or guys with known queries on them.

31. H Jones - Saw enough of him last year to suggest he can be a decent second tall forward. Pick 30
32. Coffield - Seemingly not adapted to AFL brilliantly, but has shown enough to suggest a decent career. Pick 30

33. Mihocek - can obviously play but 29yo limits his trade value. As a 23yo I would have him around the pick 20 mark. Pick 35
34. Roarke Smith - going better from half way through last year, but dropped again now. Marked down a bit due to 2 years older than this group. Pick 35
35. Bonar - good size, struggled with injuries a bit, I still believe he can be a decent AFL player. Pick 35
36. Farrell - great kick and has speed, unsure about the rest of his game. Pick 35

37. Worpel - Played plenty of midfield. Not great disposal and not many weapons. Hard to rate but I don’t rate him highly. Pick 38

38. Holman - Great intent, Sub-par skills. Tough not to like him but has a definite ceiling. Originally drafted 2015. Pick 42

Others I would give a pick below 50 for:

Miller - Impressing Tiger supporters in his few games need to see if he is competitive in a wider variety of situations. Pace, height and a really good kick.
Dow - If he doesn’t fix his kicking forget about it. On the hope that he could I would trade a 3rd rounder for him.
Petrucelle - has shown glimpses but stocks are waning.
Z Langdon - not the worst small forward.
McPherson - good competitor unsure if he has the tools.
Amartey - Looks brilliant at times VFL level and shown glimpses in the AFL. Worth a speculative pick.
Murphy - Smart player. Happy to have on list, not a world beater.

Avoiding:

D Fogarty - too short for his mobility too slow for his height. His big weapon, his kicking for goal, also seems to have deserted him, hopefully temporarily.
G Miers - Runs really well. Hate the stupid kicking style. Would need to harden up before I would consider him. Not impossible he will I guess.
L Fogarty - reasonable runner and tackler but poor kick and not sure about his decision making and positioning at times. Not for me.
Brander - Not writing this guy off but big questions on his appetite for the contest for now.

That’s not the H. Jones who played for Essendon. The KPF Jones was drafted in 2019.
 
2021

Fritsch 7th in AFL for goal average.

OK, that is pretty good, he must be a star right? Wrong.

Fritsch equal 297th for goal assists. Equal 297th with 11 other players. Such goal assist luminaries as Tom Hickey, Ryan Burton, Nic Newman and Atu Bosenavulagi.

What does this tell us? Fritsch is not instrumental in setting up goals, he is set up to convert the good work of others up the field. He is set up to get most of Melbourne’s Joe the goose goals. He finished exactly 11th in Melbourne’s Best and Fairest Award. 11th in his best season ever. So if he had such a stellar season, why does he not even finish top 10 in the B & F? The answer is because he was not considered in Melbourne’s top 10 performers. That does not make you elite.

OK, so maybe it is tough for forwards to get votes? Wrong. Fellow specialist forwards Kysaiah Pickett, Alex Neal-Bullen and Tom McDonald were considered in the top 10 performing players for the season. Why? Because Fritsch does little more than get on the end of their good work. Maybe the field was just so hot in a Premiership year? Wrong. Fritsch got 12th in 2020. He did manage to finish 6th for the wooden spoon runner-up in 2019 though. So this “gun from day 1” has one single top 10 B & F finish, in a team that finished 17th, when he was one of only 11 players to play 19 games or more - he played all 22.

Judging by AFL official rankings he was the 131st highest ranked player in 2021 and the 18th ranked forward. They had him as Melbourne’s 3rd ranked forward, not 4th like the Demons themselves did. So the AFL ratings have elevated Fritsch just above Pickett(134th,) where Melbourne themselves rated Pickett better. So the ratings are very closely aligned with the Melbourne B & F results.

Fritsch plays his assigned role well and is a good player, but you are rating him one of the best few forwards in the AFL where the club doesn’t even rate him in their top 3 forwards in his best season. So stop it. Fritsch is not an elite forward. He is not the best medium forward in the AFL. Toby Greene for example is a miles better player. Charlie Cameron plays a not dissimilar role is a better performer. Jake Stringer is better. de Goey is better. Martin is better. Petracca is better. Heeney is better, and so on. Those guys are elite level players, not Bailey Fritsch. No AFL club is giving up a top 10 pick for Bailey Fritsch.

None of this is any shame on Bailey Fritsch, he is a good player. But it is why I have rated him where I have and why you rating him the 4th best player in his draft is a nonsense.

You just have to stop it with your 1970’s goal stats nonsense about Fritsch. Nobody misunderstands football like that any more.
HAHAHAHAA, Harry McKay averages the SAME goal assists as Fritsch. haha BURN! I'd say mcKay is elite! Let me guess, McKay isn't because he doesn't get Goal Assists? haha. Man, do your research.

I'll throw in Ben King, Larkey, Hipwood and Luke Jackson for good measure too :)

Your obsession with Goal Assists is nothing short of strange. If you average 1 goal assist a game you're elite. I thought Fritsch was the deepest forward for melbourne? lol.you just contradicted yourself.

Also Fritsch was 5th in goal avg, not 7th, and he isn' 297t for GA, he's 262nd and because you've conveniently done average instead of total, there's about 100 players that have played under 5 games which skews that number, well done.

With regards to his 11th best and fairest position, we had 5 All-Australians (Gawn, Oliver, Petracca, Lever and May) so at best he's going to come 6th. Steven May, the best full back in the league only finished 7th.

Question, do you not think if you make the AA you're not elite? I want this question answered. And if so, who else in the AA squad is not elite?

Dude, you had Ed Richards above Fritsch. you can't recover from that dribble. Rayner has literally done nothing. zilch in the afl yet.

20220413_234436.jpg
2020's leaders in Goal Assists. So many elite players mate! hahahahha Ben Ronke what a superstar! Keegan Brooksby step right up son. :) Darcy Lang, is he still in the league? lol. Let's ignore the 59 goal goal kicker and focus on these fellas. lol
 
Last edited:
HAHAHAHAA, Harry McKay averages the SAME goal assists as Fritsch. haha BURN! I'd say mcKay is elite! Let me guess, McKay isn't because he doesn't get Goal Assists? haha. Man, do your research.

I'll throw in Ben King, Larkey, Hipwood and Luke Jackson for good measure too :)

Your obsession with Goal Assists is nothing short of strange. If you average 1 goal assist a game you're elite. I thought Fritsch was the deepest forward for melbourne? lol.you just contradicted yourself.

Also Fritsch was 5th in goal avg, not 7th, and he isn' 297t for GA, he's 262nd and because you've conveniently done average instead of total, there's about 100 players that have played under 5 games which skews that number, well done.

With regards to his 11th best and fairest position, we had 5 All-Australians (Gawn, Oliver, Petracca, Lever and May) so at best he's going to come 6th. Steven May, the best full back in the league only finished 7th.

Question, do you not think if you make the AA you're not elite? I want this question answered. And if so, who else in the AA squad is not elite?

Dude, you had Ed Richards above Fritsch. you can't recover from that dribble. Rayner has literally done nothing. zilch in the afl yet.

View attachment 1372085
2020's leaders in Goal Assists. So many elite players mate! hahahahha Ben Ronke what a superstar! Keegan Brooksby step right up son. :) Darcy Lang, is he still in the league? lol. Let's ignore the 59 goal goal kicker and focus on these fellas. lol


Bailey Fritsch is not an elite AFL footballer, which I think is normally defined as being in the top 10% in your role. However it is worked out, here is Champion Data’s list of elite players in the AFL after 2021.



Fyi McKay is also not considered elite. You are making the mistake of looking at the Coleman Medal standings and thinking that equates to a list from top to bottom of the best AFL forwards. It doesn’t.

Why goal assists are important is because when you add a players goals + goal assists together you get a lot better indication of their scoreboard impact, than just going by goals alone.

And Fritsch was 7th on goals per game average, not 5th as you claim:


1649864117220.png


Goals + Goal Assists I make:

3.5 Walker
3.4 Franklin, T Greene
3.3 McKay, Hawkins
3.2 J Cameron
3.1 Riewoldt Kennedy
3.0 Hogan
2.9 Taberner, C Cameron Stringer Papley
2.8 Fritsch

So Fritsch sunk to 14th in the AFL on average per game in 2021 when you add goals + goal assists. It also puts McKay’s season into a bit clearer perspective. Very respectable, but hardly earth shattering is it? Especially when you consider almost all those other players will be leading Fritsch for possessions. And Fritsch is playing in the best team in the competition.

Fritsch was also 12th of that group for average score involvements and McKay was 8th. In 2021, they were players who were on the end of scoring opportunities but much less involved in other scores. It is indicative of the reasons they are not rated elite.

________________________________________

Anyway, all this does is explain why a player like Fritsch isn’t as unsurpassable as you and others seem to think. The thread is about Cam Rayner, and there is a lot to play out before he can be fairly judged as a footballer. Not many players have big years off ACL injuries so we will likely be waiting until next year to see how good he actually is.
 
Last edited:
Bailey Fritsch is not an elite AFL footballer, which I think is normally defined as being in the top 10% in your role. However it is worked out, here is Champion Data’s list of elite players in the AFL after 2021.



Fyi McKay is also not considered elite. You are making the mistake of looking at the Coleman Medal standings and thinking that equates to a list from top to bottom of the best AFL forwards. It doesn’t.

Why goal assists are important is because when you add a players goals + goal assists together you get a lot better indication of their scoreboard impact, than just going by goals alone.

And Fritsch was 7th on goals per game average, not 5th as you claim:


View attachment 1372172Goals + Goal Assists I make:

3.5 Walker
3.4 Franklin, T Greene
3.3 McKay, Hawkins
3.2 J Cameron
3.1 Riewoldt Kennedy
3.0 Hogan
2.9 Taberner, C Cameron Stringer Papley
2.8 Fritsch

So Fritsch sunk to 14th in the AFL on average per game in 2021 when you add goals + goal assists. It also puts McKay’s season into a bit clearer perspective. Very respectable, but hardly earth shattering is it? Especially when you consider almost all those other players will be leading Fritsch for possessions. And Fritsch is playing in the best team in the competition.

Fritsch was also 12th of that group for average score involvements and McKay was 8th. In 2021, they were players who were on the end of scoring opportunities but much less involved in other scores. It is indicative of the reasons they are not rated elite.

________________________________________

Anyway, all this does is explain why a player like Fritsch isn’t as unsurpassable as you and others seem to think. The thread is about Cam Rayner, and there is a lot to play out before he can be fairly judged as a footballer. Not many players have big years off ACL injuries so we will likely be waiting until next year to see how good he actually is.
You have an alarming amount of free time on your hands.
 
You have an alarming amount of free time on your hands.

It is true that due to a range of unusual circumstances, I have a lot of time on my hands during weekdays and nights. I have no idea why you would be alarmed by that. I would tend to be more concerned for a person if they didn’t have time on their hands. 😁
 
Last edited:
Bailey Fritsch is not an elite AFL footballer, which I think is normally defined as being in the top 10% in your role. However it is worked out, here is Champion Data’s list of elite players in the AFL after 2021.



Fyi McKay is also not considered elite. You are making the mistake of looking at the Coleman Medal standings and thinking that equates to a list from top to bottom of the best AFL forwards. It doesn’t.

Why goal assists are important is because when you add a players goals + goal assists together you get a lot better indication of their scoreboard impact, than just going by goals alone.

And Fritsch was 7th on goals per game average, not 5th as you claim:


View attachment 1372172Goals + Goal Assists I make:

3.5 Walker
3.4 Franklin, T Greene
3.3 McKay, Hawkins
3.2 J Cameron
3.1 Riewoldt Kennedy
3.0 Hogan
2.9 Taberner, C Cameron Stringer Papley
2.8 Fritsch

So Fritsch sunk to 14th in the AFL on average per game in 2021 when you add goals + goal assists. It also puts McKay’s season into a bit clearer perspective. Very respectable, but hardly earth shattering is it? Especially when you consider almost all those other players will be leading Fritsch for possessions. And Fritsch is playing in the best team in the competition.

Fritsch was also 12th of that group for average score involvements and McKay was 8th. In 2021, they were players who were on the end of scoring opportunities but much less involved in other scores. It is indicative of the reasons they are not rated elite.

________________________________________

Anyway, all this does is explain why a player like Fritsch isn’t as unsurpassable as you and others seem to think. The thread is about Cam Rayner, and there is a lot to play out before he can be fairly judged as a footballer. Not many players have big years off ACL injuries so we will likely be waiting until next year to see how good he actually is.
You didn't answer any of my questions....

But nice to clarify that you don't think Harry mcKay is elite. lol. Or the other players in bold.

Maybe put odds on the Ben Ronke for All Australian :)

Also funny how you cherry pick the stats but as soon as I pulled out stats about forward pressure etc. with Pickett and Spargo, you went silent and moved on strangely to another stat which I then disapproved.

Night,

Ben Ronke 'superstar'.

p.s. maybe give us your insights on what you think Luke Jackson is worth considering he doesn't statistically amaze in any category really. Would you offer him 200k-300k based on his statistical output? :)

But I know how you rate players. You look at their draft number, and rate them according to hype articles that come from the club.
 
What s this crap about Brisbane trading Rayner ? He is still contracted for a couple of years and they are not going to give him away now when his currency is at its lowest
?

I think he will be better as the season goes on, takes a while for most players to get their MOJO back after an ACL.
What mojo? He's always been shite.
 
No. You were the one saying he wasn’t a top 15 player in the draft.

I’m guessing that if he wanted out you’d be one of the first posters saying that he was worth a very early pick.

Brisbane need points for Ashcroft, who is likely the number 1 draft pick this year.

Would only make sense for them to trade him right now for that reason (your offer is very reasonable I think btw on current form and output to date)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread Cam Rayner

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top