Certified Legendary Thread Cam Rayner

Remove this Banner Ad

You didn't answer any of my questions....

But nice to clarify that you don't think Harry mcKay is elite. lol. Or the other players in bold.

Maybe put odds on the Ben Ronke for All Australian :)

Also funny how you cherry pick the stats but as soon as I pulled out stats about forward pressure etc. with Pickett and Spargo, you went silent and moved on strangely to another stat which I then disapproved.

Night,

Ben Ronke 'superstar'.

p.s. maybe give us your insights on what you think Luke Jackson is worth considering he doesn't statistically amaze in any category really. Would you offer him 200k-300k based on his statistical output? :)

But I know how you rate players. You look at their draft number, and rate them according to hype articles that come from the club.

You are all over the place now. I will politely decline answering your strange irrelevant requests. Let’s summarise where we are with things.

The thread is about Cam Rayner. My rating him 9th in his draft crop for future value is based on what I believe he is likely to produce in the future. You rate him 30th in his draft class for value over his whole career. One of the several cues I used to rate him is where he was picked in the draft. Why I use that as a cue in his case is because it gives a useful clue to how good he is. I believe Rayner doing his knee stopped us from seeing him become significantly more prominent from 2021 onwards. Another cue I used is that in watching him play in his 3rd season and especially in the finals before he did his knee, he looked like he was gaining a lot more confidence to use his strengths at AFL level.

Am I right or wrong? Only time can tell that. He has played 4 games at any age older than 20yo. Those 4 games are coming off an ACL injury.

You seem to be jumping up and down because I rated Rayner above Bailey Fritsch for future value. You rate Fritsch - based on a different criteria, that being the value of the player’s whole career - 4th best from the draft crop of 2017. I think this is quite wrong and have Fritsch rated 16th for future value, possibly around 10th for whole career value. You seem to base your rating of Fritsch almost wholly on his goal tally of 59 goals from 24 games in 2021. I say you base it solely on the goal tally because that is basically all he did, kick goals. And he has done nothing of any significance in any other season. Let’s remember Fritsch had not even played an AFL game by the time he was the age Rayner last played before doing his knee. To show you just approximately where I think Fritsch’s 2021 season fits, let’s compare it to Josh Caddy’s 2018 season.

2018 as a 25yo Caddy played 22 games. He scored 46 goals and had 8 goal assists, 46 + 8 = 54. He averaged 16 disposals. He made the All Australian squad of 40. Caddy finished 10th in his club’s Best & Fairest. Richmond won the Minor Premiership.

2021 after 22 games a 24yo Fritsch had 51 goals and 6 goal assists = 57. Three more than Caddy after 22 games in 2018. But Fritsch averaged just 10 disposals to Caddy’s 16. Fritsch also made the AA squad in 2021. Fritsch finished 12th in his club’s Best & Fairest. Melbourne won the Minor Premiership.

Richmond thought so much of Caddy’s 2018 season they never played him in that role again, and went on to win the next two flags. Fritsch and Melbourne of course had 2 great games to finish off the season, whereas Caddy and Richmond in 2018 did not. But this I believe does put some perspective to Fritsch’s 2021 season. It was nowhere near as remarkable as you think it was. These guys at their best are very tidy players but they are not elite. The more I look at Fritsch the more I realise Melbourne would not net a top 10 draft pick for him if they traded him. I am confident his trade value would be around a late first round pick. And I doubt Brisbane would unload Rayner for less than that.

So I don’t know why you are making such a big thing of it.
 
Last edited:
You are all over the place now. I will politely decline answering your strange irrelevant requests. Let’s summarise where we are with things.

The thread is about Cam Rayner. My rating him 9th in his draft crop for future value is based on what I believe he is likely to produce in the future. You rate him 30th in his draft class for value over his whole career. One of the several cues I used to rate him is where he was picked in the draft. Why I use that as a cue in his case is because it gives a useful clue to how good he is. I believe Rayner doing his knee stopped us from seeing him become significantly more prominent from 2021 onwards. Another cue I used is that in watching him play in his 3rd season and especially in the finals before he did his knee, he looked like he was gaining a lot more confidence to use his strengths at AFL level.

Am I right or wrong? Only time can tell that. He has played 4 games at any age older than 20yo. Those 4 games are coming off an ACL injury.

You seem to be jumping up and down because I rated Rayner above Bailey Fritsch for future value. You rate Fritsch - based on a different criteria, that being the value of the player’s whole career - 4th best from the draft crop of 2017. I think this is quite wrong and have Fritsch rated 16th for future value, possibly around 10th for whole career value. You seem to base your rating of Fritsch almost wholly on his goal tally of 59 goals from 24 games in 2021. I say you base it solely on the goal tally because that is basically all he did, kick goals. And he has done nothing of any significance in any other season. Let’s remember Fritsch had not even played an AFL game by the time he was the age Rayner last played before doing his knee. To show you just approximately where I think Fritsch’s 2021 season fits, let’s compare it to Josh Caddy’s 2018 season.

2018 as a 25yo Caddy played 22 games. He scored 46 goals and had 8 goal assists, 46 + 8 = 54. He averaged 16 disposals. He made the All Australian squad of 40. Caddy finished 10th in his club’s Best & Fairest. Richmond won the Minor Premiership.

2021 after 22 games a 24yo Fritsch had 51 goals and 6 goal assists = 57. Three more than Caddy after 22 games in 2018. But Fritsch averaged just 10 disposals to Caddy’s 16. Fritsch also made the AA squad in 2021. Fritsch finished 12th in his club’s Best & Fairest. Melbourne won the Minor Premiership.

Richmond thought so much of Caddy’s 2018 season they never played him in that role again, and went on to win the next two flags. Fritsch and Melbourne of course had 2 great games to finish off the season, whereas Caddy and Richmond in 2018 did not. But this I believe does put some perspective Fritsch’s 2021 season. It was nowhere near as remarkable as you think it was. These guys at their best are very tidy players but they are not elite. The more I look at Fritsch the more I realise Melbourne would not net a top 10 draft pick for him if they traded him. I am confident his trade value would be around a late first round pick. And I doubt Brisbane would unload Rayner for less than that.

So I don’t know why you are making such a big thing of it.
at this point you're clearly trolling.

If you want to rate ed richards and ben ronke over the likes of McKay, Luke Jackson and Fritsch thats on you.

To suggest Fritschs 2021 season wasnt elite is nothing short of foolish.

At the end of the day, if you make the AA squad, you're elite. if rayner makes the squad i'll give him his due credit.

i competely discredited your goal assists stat and now you conveniently change your focus. Not to mention his poor defensive stats.

When Rayner is 28 and is still a fringe player or out of the league you'll still be talking about 'future value' and completely ignoring the fact that he's been a scrub for 10 years.

I have no interest in continuing this deranged convo. There's no chance rayner is a top 20 in this draft if it was re-done today.

You're far too easily seduced by the fact that he has a good AFL frame but every time he goes into the midfield he shows that he can't find the ball. And everytime he goes forward he shows he doesnt apply fwd pressure or kick goals. He's already played 60 odd games and he's kicked 3 goals once....in a good team.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

at this point you're clearly trolling.

If you want to rate ed richards and ben ronke over the likes of McKay, Luke Jackson and Fritsch thats on you.

To suggest Fritschs 2021 season wasnt elite is nothing short of foolish.

At the end of the day, if you make the AA squad, you're elite. if rayner makes the squad i'll give him his due credit.

i competely discredited your goal assists stat and now you conveniently change your focus. Not to mention his poor defensive stats.

When Rayner is 28 and is still a fringe player or out of the league you'll still be talking about 'future value' and completely ignoring the fact that he's been a scrub for 10 years.

I have no interest in continuing this deranged convo. There's no chance rayner is a top 20 in this draft if it was re-done today.

You're far too easily seduced by the fact that he has a good AFL frame but every time he goes into the midfield he shows that he can't find the ball. And everytime he goes forward he shows he doesnt apply fwd pressure or kick goals. He's already played 60 odd games and he's kicked 3 goals once....in a good team.

Ben Ronke. 😂😂😂. Where did you conjure that from? And to my knowledge I have never rated Richards versus McKay nor Jackson. So you are being weird.

And you are calling me a troll. Enough said.

I’ve made my ratings and explained them. You have made yours. We will see over time how they stand up.
 
Ben Ronke. 😂😂😂. Where did you conjure that from? And to my knowledge I have never rated Richards versus McKay nor Jackson. So you are being weird.

And you are calling me a troll. Enough said.

I’ve made my ratings and explained them. You have made yours. We will see over time how they stand up.
I screenshot-ed the list of leading Goal Assists in 2020. and Ben Ronke was the best in the AFL. You know where it came from, I showed you.

Yep, looking forward to Rayner kicking 6 so I can say that they were easy goals. :)
 
Because you've been raving on about Goal assist numbers for a long time now. And I shot it down swiftly with my screenshot of Ben Ronke being the best in the AFL in Goal assists amongst many other scrubs.

The only thing I have said about goal assists is you get a better idea of a players scoreboard impact by adding their goals and goal assists together. Do you disagree with that?
 
The only thing I have said about goal assists is you get a better idea of a players scoreboard impact by adding their goals and goal assists together. Do you disagree with that?
No you didn't. You used it in conjunction with goals to analyse a player. And then i showed you that the coleman medallist Harry Mckay didnt give goal assists and thats why you said Mckay wasn't elite.

Then i showed you the top 15 goal assist players in the afl in 2020 and they're the biggest scrubs in the AFL like Darcy Lang, Keegan Brooksby and Ben Ronke. You'd think if its such an important stat that they'd still be on an afl list lol
 
No you didn't. You used it in conjunction with goals to analyse a player. And then i showed you that the coleman medallist Harry Mckay didnt give goal assists and thats why you said Mckay wasn't elite.

Then i showed you the top 15 goal assist players in the afl in 2020 and they're the biggest scrubs in the AFL like Darcy Lang, Keegan Brooksby and Ben Ronke. You'd think if its such an important stat that they'd still be on an afl list lol

I write that all I have said about goal assists is that by adding a players goals + goal assists gives you a better indication of their scoreboard impact than just going by the players goals kicked.

You say no I didn’t. Then you proceed to write something that shows what I said to be correct.

I think I get it now and we should cease discussing this. You take the last word.
 
I write that all I have said about goal assists is that by adding a players goals + goal assists gives you a better indication of their scoreboard impact than just going by the players goals kicked.

You say no I didn’t. Then you proceed to write something that shows what I said to be correct.

I think I get it now and we should cease discussing this. You take the last word.
Another predictably pathetic game by Rayner tonight. i honestly thought he was the medi sub at one point lol
 
You based the fact that you rated Rayner more than Fritsch because Rayner is younger. That's all you said. Nothing he's done on field. All hype eculation. He is basically a far worse version of Colin Sylvia.

For you to be correct, Rayner would have to be a multiple All-Australian and have multiple years of 50 goals plus. He will also have to produced in finals on the big stage with best on ground performances. The odds of him doing this are 0%. Not 10%, not 5% but 0%. The odds of him being delisted or traded within 3 seasons for pick 50+ is probably about 50%. You're also happy to keep giving Rayner more and more time even though you mark Fritsch down because he is older. So assuming Rayner does nothing this season, he would have produced 0 poor AFL seasons and Fritsch would likely have produced 4 good seasons and 1 elite season. So that's 5 years of production before Rayner even plays AFL standard footy. He can't catch that up. So time won't tell, it's already told.

Not sure what you're raving on about Pick 4 for? Yeah pick 4 for a guy that kicked the 2nd most games in the AFL last season and 6 in a granny which hasn't been done for 20 years. Why are talking about playing as a deep forward or not? Yeah, so is Tom Hawkins what's your point? And you're using stats from 4 games of footy instead of a whole season that's just passed. lol. how convenient. Shall we pull up Rayner's stats from the first 4 rounds?

Another predictably pathetic game by Rayner tonight. i honestly thought he was the medi sub at one point lol
Where is he at?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Another predictably pathetic game by Rayner tonight. i honestly thought he was the medi sub at one point lol

He was fine. Had a few good moments, a decent last term. It's not going to happen overnight coming back from an ACL.
 
He was fine. Had a few good moments, a decent last term. It's not going to happen overnight coming back from an ACL.

Yeah 12 disposals, 7 contested possessions, 1 contested grab, 1 goal and 1 goal assist with 7 score involvements, 92% disposal efficiency as a small forward. Highest score involvements of any permanent small forward in the game. Did someone actually describe that as a pathetic game? I look forward to Brisbane dropping him next week then. 😱
 
Last edited:
Yeah 12 disposals, 7 contested possessions, 1 contested grab, 1 goal and 1 goal assist with 7 score involvements, 92% disposal efficiency as a small forward. Highest score involvements of any permanent small forward in the game. Did someone actually describe that as a pathetic game? I look forward to Brisbane dropping him next week then. 😱
hahaha. 12 touches, 4 clangers. lolz.

Another predictably poor game. Never does anything. I'm still waiting for him to show us something other than a fringe at best player but nope, still in the 18-22 of the best players. Snore
 
Yeah 12 disposals, 7 contested possessions, 1 contested grab, 1 goal and 1 goal assist with 7 score involvements, 92% disposal efficiency as a small forward. Highest score involvements of any permanent small forward in the game. Did someone actually describe that as a pathetic game? I look forward to Brisbane dropping him next week then.

The bar is set very ****ing low if that is a pass mark for a 5th year number 1 pick



Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
 
The bar is set very ******* low if that is a pass mark for a 5th year number 1 pick



Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
Why are there Melbourne supporters in here smashing a number one pick when their club selected Watts? Didn’t that get old, having every nuffy smash Watts?

Rayner played a great game for a small forward yesterday night, I thought he was one of their better players. Once he is fit he’ll move on-ball. He’s not been back running all that long realistically.

Marchbank did his about three weeks after Rayner and he is four weeks from playing VFL. Cuningham did his eight weeks after Rayner and he is twelve weeks from the VFL.

To be playing in any capacity at this point of the season speaks volumes as to how highly the kid is rated.
 
Yeah 12 disposals, 7 contested possessions, 1 contested grab, 1 goal and 1 goal assist with 7 score involvements, 92% disposal efficiency as a small forward. Highest score involvements of any permanent small forward in the game. Did someone actually describe that as a pathetic game? I look forward to Brisbane dropping him next week then. 😱
All well and good, but these are the kind of stats he was reeling in in Year 1.

It's now his 5th season.

Bit of a chicken and egg scenario. If he goes into the middle and hits those kind of stats clearly he is underperforming, but he still doesn't look like he has the tank to compete in there for 70% of the game. Brisbane also have a bunch of guys competing for midfield time and don't need to add another player to the mix.
 
Neither of these guys went number one and tbf seem to play commensurate with their recovery.
Commensurate with their recovery? How so, when we’ve not seen them play post injury?

And I’m not sure how Marchbank’s draft position is relevant, he is a top 10 pick after all. Besides that, since when is a players original draft position relevant to their post injury expectations? Are you suggesting that because Patrick Cripps was taken at 9, that we should be easier on him and expect his recovery to his best to be longer?

Go easy on the kid, having friends at club land I know that ACL’s are incredibly impactful to a players confidence. Threads like this are garbage.
 
Why are there Melbourne supporters in here smashing a number one pick when their club selected Watts? Didn’t that get old, having every nuffy smash Watts?

Rayner played a great game for a small forward yesterday night, I thought he was one of their better players. Once he is fit he’ll move on-ball. He’s not been back running all that long realistically.

Marchbank did his about three weeks after Rayner and he is four weeks from playing VFL. Cuningham did his eight weeks after Rayner and he is twelve weeks from the VFL.

To be playing in any capacity at this point of the season speaks volumes as to how highly the kid is rated.

How am I smashing him for saying a number 1 pick in his 5th year should be going better than 10 possies and a goal a game?



68 games at an average of 11 touches a game and 0.9 goals is a disappointment for a no 1 pick no matter how you look at it. Maybe if he was tall, you could say he is developing but he isn't.




Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread Cam Rayner

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top