Can't keep the package in his pants

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Yes but isn't it the law saying that only a person within a few years can have sex with a 16 year old? It was always my understanding that it was legal for 16, 17 and 18 year olds to have sex with 16 year olds but not older than 18? Or do I have it wrong?
Pretty sure that 2 year stuff is for people under 16. So a 17 year old can do it with a 15 year old.
 
Yes but isn't it the law saying that only a person within a few years can have sex with a 16 year old? It was always my understanding that it was legal for 16, 17 and 18 year olds to have sex with 16 year olds but not older than 18? Or do I have it wrong?
No 16 is open age, just not with a teacher or guardian.
 
Yes but isn't it the law saying that only a person within a few years can have sex with a 16 year old? It was always my understanding that it was legal for 16, 17 and 18 year olds to have sex with 16 year olds but not older than 18? Or do I have it wrong?

These old interpretations have been repealed. A 16 yera old is deemed to be a sexually responsible person.

This is an outline of lawful defences

VIC Crimes Act 1958 (Section 45)

If a person is charged with engaging in sexual activities with a person under the legal age, a legal defence is outlined in section 45(4). It states that:

  • Consent is not a defence to a charge unless at the time of the alleged offence the child was aged 12 or older and -
    • (a) the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that he or she believed on reasonable grounds that the child was aged 16 or older; or
    • (b) the accused was not more than 2 years older than the child; or
    • (c) the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that he or she believed on reasonable grounds that he or she was married to the child.
The girl is 17, so it is a moot point.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

No big city lawyer, but that's nothing to do with child pr0n laws.

If she's got noodz of the package what are the odds he's dumb enough to have noodz of her?

She is not by legal definition, a child.
 
Nah mate, I'm 6'3, 185lbs and have 10% of body fat.
6'3 and 85kg?

have you tried eating? anything?. I heard caloric surplus diets are a thing.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Can't keep the package in his pants

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top