Can't keep the package in his pants

[Snake_Baker]

How old were they when they had their first kid?

Sixteen? Seventeen? Some of you folks need to be a little more realistic.

This is a saga as old as the human race.

Abby Gilmore:

Do you love me?
Will you love me forever?
Do you need me?
Will you never leave me?
Will you make me so happy
For the rest of my life?
Will you take me away
And will you make me your wife?

Jake Stringer:

I couldn't take it any longer
Lord I was crazed
And when the feeling came upon me
Like a tidal wave
I started swearing to my god
And on my mother's grave
That I would love you to the end of time
I swore I would love you to the end of time

 

[skittlebrew]

Best to get your child support assessment first before driving down his pay packet sweetie.

 

[Snake_Baker]

In respect to this it's 18.

Source? Link?

 

[King Brown]

Also I could be wrong, but isn't it illegal for a 22 year old to be having sex with a 17 year old?

No. It is not illegal.

 

[ManOfClay]

Some people think 10% body fat means you're 'strong'

And the height weight ratio would make ayce cordy proud

 

[Gavin Excell]

Rest assured master recruiter Dodoro will do whats best

 

[King Brown]

Not very rare in footy I wouldn't have thought.

Why the hell he got married and had kids, who the hell knows

Didn’t get married, the latter may not have been his choice.

 

[kaiserchief13]

Apparently the girls parents knew and condoned it as they were lifelong Dogs fans

 

[Upgrayedd]

Shit human. Looks like its really effected his football as well.

 

[kaiserchief13]

Would deck that ****head in real life

So you'd be willing to get charged with assault because an unknown person to you cheated on another unknown person to you?

 

[dmc333]

Source? Link?

Child pornography law in Victoria

Under Victorian law, you can be charged with the possession of child pornography if you have received an explicit or indecent image of a person less than 18 years of age, and may be charged with producing child pornography if you have taken the image of the minor yourself. Individuals found guilty of these offences can face up to 5 years imprisonment for possessing child pornography, or 10 years for producing it. Under the law previously, individuals under 18 could be found guilty of these offences (even if the images were of themselves), which also included mandatory placement on the sexual offenders register. This had dire effects on individual's employment prospects, as well as their ability to have contact with children in the future.

http://www.mahons.com.au/news/2016/4/28/update-on-sexting-laws-in-victoria


I doubt anything will happen, but let's be honest the guy is as dumb as dogshit and if she had noodz of him, he would have had them of her.

 

[King Brown]

Child pornography law in Victoria

Under Victorian law, you can be charged with the possession of child pornography if you have received an explicit or indecent image of a person less than 18 years of age, and may be charged with producing child pornography if you have taken the image of the minor yourself. Individuals found guilty of these offences can face up to 5 years imprisonment for possessing child pornography, or 10 years for producing it. Under the law previously, individuals under 18 could be found guilty of these offences (even if the images were of themselves), which also included mandatory placement on the sexual offenders register. This had dire effects on individual's employment prospects, as well as their ability to have contact with children in the future.

http://www.mahons.com.au/news/2016/4/28/update-on-sexting-laws-in-victoria


I doubt anything will happen, but let's be honest the guy is as dumb as dogshit and if she had noodz of him, he would have had them of her.

Let’s be honest, that law is moronic.
If you can consent to sex, you can consent to your nude photos being held by a sexual partner.

Hasn’t it been used mostly against teens themselves?

 

[Footy_Fan2007]

Scums of the West, red white and blue...

The family club......

 

[dmc333]

Let’s be honest, that law is moronic.
If you can consent to sex, you can consent to your nude photos being held by a sexual partner.

Hasn’t it been used mostly against teens themselves?

Yep and it's been changed in respect to those under 18 if you're in the image or you're within 2 years of the person in the image.

 

[BG32]

Another young guy with a punting problem.

******* vultures like Sportsbet etc don't help

I see today you could get a free bet with the Herald sun. its a ****ing joke

 

[Strange Cat]

Or maybe she is sick of all the rumours, and just wants the truth out there.

Not when she has blog...more publicity more money for her

 

[Visions]

1.Does this devalue his worth?
2.How would clubs approach a situation like this?

Now we know why his form has been off the last year and a bit.

Clubs aren't exactly fans of players who have off field issues affecting their performances so I would say it will devalue his worth a little bit. In the end though someone will take the risk and pick him up in the hope he turns it around.

Happened with Fevola and Carey, even though they didn't quite live up to their reputations with their new clubs.

 

[Jables]

When he shacked up and started having kids, he pretty much was a baby, so yeah, it is an excuse.

It's easy for you to sit there and wave your critical finger at Stringer for falling in to temptation. I'd wager you have never been in a similar situation, so your limited life experiences pretty much make your opinions redundant.

Haha, so having a kid, at 18 or so, means you can be excused for being a complete piece of shit. Gotcha. He's 23 years old, and basically any age is old enough to know not to have sex with schoolgirls taking pictures of you and sending it to your family.

What's worse is that rumours about her were going on during it by the sounds of it, good on her.

 

[The Lemon]

The family club......

Families can be bad too. My family will cut you

 

[Snake_Baker]

Child pornography law in Victoria

Under Victorian law, you can be charged with the possession of child pornography if you have received an explicit or indecent image of a person less than 18 years of age, and may be charged with producing child pornography if you have taken the image of the minor yourself. Individuals found guilty of these offences can face up to 5 years imprisonment for possessing child pornography, or 10 years for producing it. Under the law previously, individuals under 18 could be found guilty of these offences (even if the images were of themselves), which also included mandatory placement on the sexual offenders register. This had dire effects on individual's employment prospects, as well as their ability to have contact with children in the future.

http://www.mahons.com.au/news/2016/4/28/update-on-sexting-laws-in-victoria


I doubt anything will happen, but let's be honest the guy is as dumb as dogshit and if she had noodz of him, he would have had them of her.

That case we are presently discussing does not qualify under those laws, as no criminal offence has been committed. Remember, it is the girl who has allegedly sent the texts.:

Exceptions to child pornography offences

From 2 November 2014 you can not be prosecuted for child pornography offences if you take, store or send indecent images of yourself.

It is also not a child pornography offence if you are under 18 years old and:

• no person in the photo is more than two years younger than you
• the photo does not show an act that is serious criminal offence.

https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/find-legal-answers/sex-and-law/sexting-and-child-pornography

 

[Thedeftouch]

Trial by media, etc., but this seems very believable.

I also get the impression that JJ is a much better person and probably feels sorry for her

 

[The_Flying_Egg]

I'm now glad he's going

 

[Snake_Baker]

Haha, so having a kid, at 18 or so, means you can be excused for being a complete piece of shit. Gotcha. He's 23 years old, and basically any age is old enough to know not to have sex with schoolgirls taking pictures of you and sending it to your family.

What's worse is that rumours about her were going on during it by the sounds of it, good on her.

You seem to have lived a very sheltered life.

 

[dmc333]

That case we are presently discussing does not qualify under those laws, as no criminal offence has been committed. Remember, it is the girl who has allegedly sent the texts.:

Exceptions to child pornography offences

From 2 November 2014 you can not be prosecuted for child pornography offences if you take, store or send indecent images of yourself.

It is also not a child pornography offence if you are under 18 years old and:

• no person in the photo is more than two years younger than you
• the photo does not show an act that is serious criminal offence.

https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/find-legal-answers/sex-and-law/sexting-and-child-pornography

I was talking about the hypothetical where Stringer had pictures of her.

 

[King Brown]

I think his ex has been in the news two-three times in the past year. Nothing from Stringer. At worst he’s just a bit of a cad. I’m not sure why this says anything profound about his character.