Presume we have spotters on the ground in SA and WA. Perhaps the SA guy has been the most vocal?
-
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
-
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round SF Winner: And_ROOS
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. Carlton's 2020 Draft Thread
- Thread starter Eiffel 65
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Like the W.A. guy used to be.
Given our list situation, I'd sooner take a chance on something unseen this year that has a higher potential, than taking something we saw and that may have otherwise been a pick in the 60's or 70's in a normal year.
That's hard to prove, but you get the idea.
- Moderator
- #1,853
- Jul 14, 2005
- 18,723
- 29,563
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC
- Banned
- #1,854
Probably rather the player is honest, but if I was a Vic-based recruiter I'd be a little wary of picking him up.
Might end up slipping to Collingwood's pick, or further. Doesn't seem an obvious fit for Essendon.
EDIT: Just saw the comment. The 'I think it'd impact me' is a red flag for sure.
That's plainly f'd... unless for serious reasons, medically, family etc that's just not kosher and you'd think make you ineligible to be drafted as I'm sure by signing that form you commit to being drafted anywhere selected.
Not go forth and multiply the pricks are already getting enough father sons and NGAs.Because we are Carlton and go forth 'n multiply the rest?
Also
Clubs ain't gonna change who they need just to stuff us up.....
Except maybe Dodo...
Last edited by a moderator:
Because clubs might make decisions on players they want, not what we want.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Mar 20, 2017
- 10,448
- 35,172
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Not sure if it means anything as I am sure that we have spoken to many potential draftees but I understand that we have spoken to Seamus Mitchell a couple of times.
And knowing we want player X at pick X allows another club to make moves to jump ahead of us to take that player if they rwte him and are behind us in draft position in that range of picks.
If he is too immature to move interstate then he is obviously not ready to be drafted into a professional environment that requires sacrifice and hard work not to mention team work, massive problem for any club looking at him.
- Moderator
- #1,863
Don’t pick me, I’m staying home: AFL world stunned by top 10 prospect Archie Perkins’ call
‘Didn’t come out the way he meant it’: AFL manager defends top 10 prospect’s stunning call
www.foxsports.com.au
I take your point in theory, but it seems highly unlikely that the player B70 described as at the top of our list will be available at our 1st pick.
Likewise, we all knew our order of 4 last year, and it made zero difference to who was picked where. Our 1st 3 were taken, and we moved back knowing we would still get Kemp.
myblueroan
The truth sometimes arrives on horses. 🐎
me and knobhead...I am not alone. hug me!
Well the whole draft process arguably amounts to restraint of trade so swings and roundabouts
Clubs move up all the time if they know other clubs have interest in other players.
Jist seems unusual for a respected ITK to drop draft information.
While clubs speak to a large group of potential recruits before the draft most clubs don't leak any information on who they plan to pick.
If he's not anywhere close to being there when we have our pick there's no point them being in our list.
- Aug 22, 2014
- 13,850
- 50,341
- AFL Club
- Carlton
To illustrate this point a little better - let's say that, hypothetically, Freo like [insert player here] with their Pick 32. Carlton go and inform the world that we're keen on [same player]. Freo, knowing that the player they want is unlikely to get past us, can then try and orchestrate a pick swap with NM, WB, Melbourne, Geelong, GWS etc. to sneak in ahead of us.
On the other hand...if we spread misinformation about players, suggesting we like someone we don't actually intend to draft, then there is always the possibility that we game a club into trading up and improving our pool of available players a bit. Say we suggest that we like Durdin even though we don't - Freo actually want him - they trade up and take him with Melbourne's Pick 28. That means that we've ensured that a player we don't want anyway goes at Pick 28, instead of whichever player Melbourne might have taken.
It's simply good practice to avoid notifying opposition clubs of your intentions. There's nothing to be gained by it, but certainly some potential to lose out. Ideally, you want to convince other clubs that you want players you don't want - as that reduces the chances of a club trading up to shark your actual target, and may lead to a player sliding a little further than they otherwise would.
I would really be surprised if we took both Rowe and Wehr in the 2nd round
My preference would be point of difference players, Winder, Ford, Rosman types
If not, then happy with Pedlar types
My preference would be point of difference players, Winder, Ford, Rosman types
If not, then happy with Pedlar types
tencentpiece
All Australian
- Oct 18, 2013
- 821
- 16,950
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Cats expected to nab Walsh, we've told him that we will pick him up if he is there at the end of the draft.
Or he's been coached to put that message out....
tencentpiece
All Australian
- Oct 18, 2013
- 821
- 16,950
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Doubtful unless one the players we liked in the top5-10 slid into the 20s.
