Strategy CEO Thread - Jennifer Watt - Started Jan 2023

Remove this Banner Ad

In a parallel world the board decide WA hasn't come to fruition after all these years and instead pimp games to somewhere like Cairns to the detriment of everything associated with the club besides the short term bottom line.
One advantage. Cairns doesn't have fluoridation of their water.
 
No wonder we've not heard much from Jen, she's been too busy performance managing James Gallagher (GM Strategy and Legal) who on the surface of it rivals Scott Clayton, Glenn Luff, Cam Joyce and Gavin Brown as the most useless club employees in recent history.

Based on what we heard from her, the club was sitting on its hands in terms of options post Tasmania until the 19th team was announced and the idea for playing in SW WA came from an AFL employee who manages the fixturing.

It beggars belief that they were not internally planning for an exit for years before this given the ongoing rumblings of Tasmania getting their own team.

Also to have the fixture guy point out the opportunity (especially given it's been something the club has looked at in the past), dear me.
While I kind of agree, my understanding is that we were told - unequivocally - no last time after trying for quite a while. If head office won't entertain something it's not that outrageous for us to eventually move on. It's only come up now, clearly, because it is now convenient for the AFL as well. They are not our friends, at least not good friends. They'll go to a party with us, but dump us for someone better the minute it's convenient. It suits them now because they've let themselves be backed into a corner on Tas, primarily through likely gambling against both State & Federal Gov's agreeing to their stadium and conditions. We're helping them out and they're getting grief from WA because SA Gov were able to gift their teams benefit and WA weren't. Those clubs are all well aware that when Tas comes in it will be the non Vic clubs and small Melbourne clubs expected to do the lions share of travel to Tas.

The bold part no argument at all though. Hopefully we're awake now and ahead of things.
 
Last edited:
SEN interview with Jen re players reaction to 2 home games in WA -

They can’t wait for the surfing and golf.

No need to wonder what’s wrong with this playing group.

North Melbourne - “The recreational Club”
it is the best time to be getting over there before or just after the autumn break, re weather. if they are going to be there the whole week you cannot expect them to be on the clock the entire week.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

No wonder we've not heard much from Jen, she's been too busy performance managing James Gallagher (GM Strategy and Legal) who on the surface of it rivals Scott Clayton, Glenn Luff, Cam Joyce and Gavin Brown as the most useless club employees in recent history.

Based on what we heard from her, the club was sitting on its hands in terms of options post Tasmania until the 19th team was announced and the idea for playing in SW WA came from an AFL employee who manages the fixturing.

It beggars belief that they were not internally planning for an exit for years before this given the ongoing rumblings of Tasmania getting their own team.

Also to have the fixture guy point out the opportunity (especially given it's been something the club has looked at in the past), dear me.
Give the man a trophy because if thats even close to true its an achievement greater than brisbanes threepeat.
 
far out people are reaching here to have a go at her over this deal. Here are the crux of the deal.

1. North are still only selling 4 home games, and will be reduced to 2 once the Tassie deal ends. So more games in Melbourne
2. They are getting more money for 2 games in Perth than they did for 4 in Tassie
3. North always play at least 1 game in WA, often 2. So now they get paid over $2 million to play games they normally play anyway.
4. The home games against Weagles and Flogmantle are generally poor attendance at home anyway, so now they get way more money for those games tha they would if they were in Melbourne.
5. Who cares where an idea comes from, at least they are not so arrogant to not be open to good ideas from other people. They heard the idea and capitalised on it.
6. If we are good enough to win a flag, then we are good enough to win in Perth
 
Last edited:
it is the best time to be getting over there before or just after the autumn break, re weather. if they are going to be there the whole week you cannot expect them to be on the clock the entire week.
I’d would have hoped that the players would treat it as a mini football camp because god knows they need the extra work.

But that’s not even the point.

It suggests the group is quite happy to concede home ground advantage for golf and surfing, like wins don’t even matter.
 
No wonder we've not heard much from Jen, she's been too busy performance managing James Gallagher (GM Strategy and Legal) who on the surface of it rivals Scott Clayton, Glenn Luff, Cam Joyce and Gavin Brown as the most useless club employees in recent history.

Based on what we heard from her, the club was sitting on its hands in terms of options post Tasmania until the 19th team was announced and the idea for playing in SW WA came from an AFL employee who manages the fixturing.

It beggars belief that they were not internally planning for an exit for years before this given the ongoing rumblings of Tasmania getting their own team.

Also to have the fixture guy point out the opportunity (especially given it's been something the club has looked at in the past), dear me.
What is the issue with this? We went to the AFL and said we're exploring opportunities in Western Australia and the person who looks after the fixture says why don't you have a look in the Margaret River region. It's a collaborative process with the AFL.
 
SEN interview with Jen re players reaction to 2 home games in WA -

They can’t wait for the surfing and golf.

No need to wonder what’s wrong with this playing group.

North Melbourne - “The recreational Club”
And hopefully a clinic for the NMFC-supporting kids in WA.
 
SEN interview with Jen re players reaction to 2 home games in WA -

They can’t wait for the surfing and golf.

No need to wonder what’s wrong with this playing group.

North Melbourne - “The recreational Club”
"Just for recreation's sake to pass the time away"

May we should change this line in our theme song?
 
Our CEO has probably put in over a year of work - multiple meetings with several state Governments and the AFL, explored options overseas, worked out commercial arrangements and logistics, as well as negotiated a semi-withdrawal from the Spirit of Tasmania contract and courtesy meetings with the Tasmanian Government. Yet some people feel it just "fell in her lap". Condescending, disrespectful and frankly, pathetic.
 

Attachments

  • Facepalm.png
    Facepalm.png
    270.2 KB · Views: 7
I’d would have hoped that the players would treat it as a mini football camp because god knows they need the extra work.

But that’s not even the point.

It suggests the group is quite happy to concede home ground advantage for golf and surfing, like wins don’t even matter.
You're reading too much into it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You're reading too much into it.
Yeah. I'd say a fair guess that if your boss is walking the office and getting ready to spruik a deal in the media that pays around a 3rd of the teams wages for the year it might be smart to nod, smile and say how excited you are to see the sights of WA.
 
Yeah. I'd say a fair guess that if your boss is walking the office and getting ready to spruik a deal in the media that pays around a 3rd of the teams wages for the year it might be smart to nod, smile and say how excited you are to see the sights of WA.
Plus it's just a throw away line to easily dismiss the rubbish idea that players might be upset about it.
 
Belittling someone's achievements with absolutely no knowledge of the work and strategy that went into them. When the results are obviously great for us.

It's just really shit and this forum is so much poorer for it.
It's a forum, you'll get all sorts of opinions. Not worth getting too upset about it. It's not like this club has the cleanest record of dealing with members - you can't put them offside for a couple of decades then rely on trust me bro.

I honestly don't see anything too outrageous on here, broadly supportive. Some less so and some more, some valid questions (ie. there are zero guarantees that we can see that we won't end up playing the WA teams 4 times over there after next year).
 
It's a gender-neutral pronoun.

I like your passion for the club but you appear to be off target here
Nope. We are making the same mistakes over and over again. Why is selling home games to WA not making more than the Tassie Deal? Why is it “just covering the short fall”?

The sycophants will jump in to defend it, however, our club is broke as shit and should be working harder to ensure out longevity in the competition. Breaking even or making slim margins is a joke when the AFL team isn’t fully funded.
 
You can disagree all you like, the proof is in the pudding and our AFL team is served up an eaten pudding year after year. We cant be a full professional organisation until our soft cap is fully funded and people will hate me for this and I dont give a ****. I do not want an AFLW player as a coach to cover their footballing wage and still be short in the soft cap. I want more than that.

Club is run by a bunch of clowns
 
You can disagree all you like, the proof is in the pudding and our AFL team is served up an eaten pudding year after year. We cant be a full professional organisation until our soft cap is fully funded and people will hate me for this and I dont give a ****. I do not want an AFLW player as a coach to cover their footballing wage and still be short in the soft cap. I want more than that.

Club is run by a bunch of clowns
your preferences are well noted.

but thats all they are
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Strategy CEO Thread - Jennifer Watt - Started Jan 2023

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top