Why would we say we acknowledge he is worth more than our second if we can't offer more. This negotiation is dragging out and we should have bluntly said take our second now, go elsewhere or lose him for end of second compo at best next year.
Just because he nominated the club doesn't mean we have an obligation to pay overs. Since 2006 we have drafted players inside the top 20 that are all as good or better than Yarran, or potentially better. He has issues so why are we overpaying. Seems like we are desperate campaigners if true!
Just because he nominated the club doesn't mean we have an obligation to pay overs. Since 2006 we have drafted players inside the top 20 that are all as good or better than Yarran, or potentially better. He has issues so why are we overpaying. Seems like we are desperate campaigners if true!