List Mgmt. COLLINGWOOD Trade and F/A Discussion 2023

[Soups]

What about Ginni and pick 19 for 4?

Not a chance in hell.

 

[Jasper84]

If Ginni did leak the footage and the club said "stuff it, enough is enough with this child". Then wouldn't the hawks be wary of risking a 4 year big money deal on him. Especially with his history of stupid behaviour.

They did give Impey a 3 year deal after he hit 5 parked cars and fled the scene, soooo...

 

[nahnah]

What about Ginni and pick 19 for 4?

I like it, doubt the Hawks will

 

[stormskye]

What about Ginni and pick 19 for 4?

Please delete this

 

[Daicosian silk]

Pies should play hardball. Ginni is contracted. If it’s not a reasonable deal then knock it back and he plays at the Pies in 2024. Simples

 

[TakingThePies]

Would hate to lose Ginni. Too much potential and we will be selling low. Lo e the thought of all.the different small forwards we have mixing it up but Ginny is the best goal scorer. Takes away an amount of bebefit of the addition of Schultz. Doubt HH or Reef can offer anything near what Ginny can.

HH is quick, creative and a beast inside. He craps on Ginnivan.

 

[unplugged]

If we give him up for less than a first, we are knob goblins.


42 games, 5 as sub, and 58 goals.

Barely 20. Would have kicked many more if not for the indiscretion.


And he’s contracted. We paid more than we should have for Schulz because he was contracted, not who we wants him needs to do the same.

Has 10 years ahead of him.

It's the Stephenson factor

 

[TW Sherrin]

It's the Stephenson factor

He's heading down the same path.

 

[brockbruiser]

Pick 44 the pundits are saying. Laughable

Hopefully we retain him if that's all that's on the table.

 

[Didak Wine]

Fck hawks trade him to a club where it will work for us

 

[Ingy]

He’s a contracted player and we won’t be trading him unless the offer suits us.

The offer:

View attachment 1833323

Cheese and onion or GTFO

 

[Moore of the Same]

Hawks won't offer much. Let's keep him.

 

[AmericanMustard]

HH is quick, creative and a beast inside. He craps on Ginnivan.

This is.

Something

 

[Jasper84]

I'm ready to be disappointed. GW will roll over to get a deal done as always.

I've decided that every time this farcical shit take gets posted, it's getting met with a pic of one our traded in premiership players. Up first is picks 41 and 50...

 

[vindaloo]

Hopefully we retain him if that's all that's on the table.

Would we even use that pick? He's contracted. Another club has offered a 4 year deal. Forty games, 58 goals premiership player who is 20 years old. Multiple clubs interested. There's no way we should or would essentially trade him for a nothing pick, ie give him away. We have to get at least something worthwhile in return.

 

[loki04]

HH is quick, creative and a beast inside. He craps on Ginnivan.

A 7 disp, 2 tackle and 0.7 goal a game player shits on someone, who regularly, steps up to create goals, has had a 40 goal season at 19yo and has excellent footy iq.

Say that again.

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

Pies should play hardball. Ginni is contracted. If it’s not a reasonable deal then knock it back and he plays at the Pies in 2024. Simples

Yep. We always have to pay overs. Time another club started.

Future first.

He’s a 20 year old Premiership player and ANZAC Medallist. Hell, he’s currently kicking more goals than Schultz on average.

If Schultz is worth a future first and then some. Then Jack is worth a future first.

Sick of giving up good players for nothing.

 

[nahnah]

#DontFreeGinni

 

[The Royal Sampler]

What about Ginni and pick 19 for 4?

 

[Jekyll and Hyde]

Ginni for hawks F2?

 

[danielnajdek]

What about Ginni and pick 19 for 4?

Hi Mackie.

 

[sr36]

If we give him up for less than a first, we are knob goblins.


42 games, 5 as sub, and 58 goals.

Barely 20. Would have kicked many more if not for the indiscretion.


And he’s contracted. We paid more than we should have for Schulz because he was contracted, not who we wants him needs to do the same.

Has 10 years ahead of him.

He's not worth a first. Ginnis young, talented and will improve, but his pace is a serious concern. Daniel Menzel was a better version of Ginnivan when he was delisted and noone touched him.

At the moment he's going into his fourth year, is a fringe player, who is very slow for his position and has made some bad off field choices.

No one is paying much. I'd keep him though as he's a chance of being re-invented into a very good player.

 

[nahnah]

Why hawks, does he not listen to Mitchell's podcast?

 

[Kings_Gambit]

Second round pick for Ginny or he stays.

 

[Jekyll and Hyde]

One good thing is that pretty much all players that we traded out have spudded it up at their next clubs.
This has serious Stepho vibes.