Would Wingard go on the LTI list? Does that mean it opens up another spot for mid season?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I like the way you’re thinking, very devious.Would Wingard go on the LTI list? Does that mean it opens up another spot for mid season?
The LTI list no longer exists it’s now the inactive list. Ignoring that we’ll almost certainly pick up a legitimate injury of a similar long term nature between now and the SSP closing I very much doubt the AFL would allow us to knowingly create an exploit to have an extra player on our list in 2024.Would Wingard go on the LTI list? Does that mean it opens up another spot for mid season?
Let’s wait until then and look who’s out of form or injured.In place of who?
Harris Andrews likes this postWould a fit Wingard have played in the GF ahead of Frampton?
I suspect so.
It wouldn't have been ahead of Frampton, but it probably would have been ahead of Ginni.Would a fit Wingard have played in the GF ahead of Frampton?
I suspect so.
Lol. I'm sure Andrews would have preferred Wingard too.Would a fit Wingard have played in the GF ahead of Frampton?
I suspect so.
Zero chanceWould a fit Wingard have played in the GF ahead of Frampton?
I suspect so.
god no but ginni wouldn't have playedWould a fit Wingard have played in the GF ahead of Frampton?
I suspect so.
god no but ginni wouldn't have played
As I mentioned to Freo supporters who were adamant that they’d get band 2 compo if they held Schultz to next year, we gave him a reported $650k contract. Doedee got $750k and that was band 2, the threshold will likely go up again in 2024.I like Doedee but for $750k + forget it! I hope we have some juicy trades lined up for next year.
....
Wouldn’t have tried an around the corner from 40 metres
As I mentioned to Freo supporters who were adamant that they’d get band 2 compo if they held Schultz to next year, we gave him a reported $650k contract. Doedee got $750k and that was band 2, the threshold will likely go up again in 2024.
As it stands they made out like bandits getting our future first and a second rounder, but I guess we just need to get our heads around the fact that Wright will pay overs to get the deal done if he feels the list fit is good. It’s not like we can complain much about his work to this point.
Honestly if Macrae or HH aren’t established in the 23 (not fringe) by the time Wingard is fit to play then we won’t be losing a whole lot anyway.We’re taking 3 picks into this draft same as last year. For a practical example who’s offering more across 2024-5 Joe Richards or Chad Wingard? I’m not excited by the thought of him holding HH or Macrae out of the best 23, but I think our chances of going back to back are better with him on the list than any alternative at pick 60 odd in this draft.
Can you explain to me how picking up Wingard for a nothing pick, with Hawthorn paying out the bulk of his contract (yes, they’re obligated to pay the difference since they delisted him under contract), is the same as offering Wells a 3 year $600k (probably closer to $700k in todays money) free agency deal?I’d be in the no camp for Wingard. It gives me flashbacks to recruiting Daniel Wells.
Can you explain to me how picking up Wingard for a nothing pick, with Hawthorn paying out the bulk of his contract (yes, they’re obligated to pay the difference since they delisted him under contract), is the same as offering Wells a 3 year $600k (probably closer to $700k in todays money) free agency deal?
It’s a unique opportunity. If it wasn’t for injury Wingard likely wouldn’t be available at least in this manner and as you say it also doesn’t deny younger players time to establish themselves in the 23.Honestly if Macrae or HH aren’t established in the 23 (not fringe) by the time Wingard is fit to play then we won’t be losing a whole lot anyway.
I'm trying to work out how you do a medical without an achillesI’m guessing the medical didn’t go so well with Wingard
He wasn’t doing a medical. I heard someone with the initials JG posted slightly used, not needed racing silks on Facebook Market place. Pick up only.What’s with Wingard meeting McRae and Wright and undergoing a medical at Pies HQ?
Especially if his preference is to stay at Hawks who have committed to him…makes no sense.
What also makes no sense is why would we even be meeting with him on the flip side when he won’t play at all in 2024 with that Achilles injury….
The whole thing is rather unusual.
Exactly!!Can you explain to me how picking up Wingard for a nothing pick, with Hawthorn paying out the bulk of his contract (yes, they’re obligated to pay the difference since they delisted him under contract), is the same as offering Wells a 3 year $600k (probably closer to $700k in todays money) free agency deal?
Agreed. And we will only be using 2 picks on kids. The third, if not Wingard, will be another mature type or SSP selectionWe’re taking 3 picks into this draft same as last year. For a practical example who’s offering more across 2024-5 Joe Richards or Chad Wingard? I’m not excited by the thought of him holding HH or Macrae out of the best 23, but I think our chances of going back to back are better with him on the list than any alternative at pick 60 odd in this draft.
Lol. I think I've been talked into it. Obviously Fly & Wright know what they're doing, I haven't doubted them before.Agreed. And we will only be using 2 picks on kids. The third, if not Wingard, will be another mature type or SSP selection
The melts here are hilarious