TradeDraft
Post-Human
Norf, send him to the PSD!!!
He is Contracted
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Norf, send him to the PSD!!!
I think Freo would be very happy with that.Three way trade:
GWS- Lobb
Pies- Bobby
Freo - pick 27 + Cox
Make it happen.
Your correcy of course.
But
Your response to "what does it even mean" misses the point I think.
What does it mean when you get an open reference from a relative of your potential new employee?
What else could she report under those circumstances?
Employers don't usually put a lot of weight to such references.
Three way trade:
GWS- Lobb
Pies- Bobby
Freo - pick 27 + Cox
Make it happen.
That's probably one of the better ideas I've heard all trade period. Not unrealistic. The only problem is it's yet ANOTHER forward. However, if we lose JT, it's like for like.
Three way trade:
GWS- Lobb
Pies- Bobby
Freo - pick 27 + Cox
Make it happen.
I don't know enough about GWS list. Does it benefit them, because on face value it looks like they're trading out a contracted player for a loss?I think that is a win of sorts to all parties but Freo the main winner.
Hill is the exact type of player we need. Electric speed and puts in multiple efforts. Perfect transition player from half back or great pressure player as a half forward. Yes Please.
I would do that trade as overall we do benefit.
From the GWs perspective, Pies have little to trade, so would depend on if they were open to a future pick - 2R would have to be it, and we hope Pies do poorly next year. We might have to split pick #2 or #13 to now replace a guy we didn't expect to have to.
This would do it for me. I think we're giving up the most, but don't desparately need either of Cox or pick 27, so its enticing for the other clubs.Three way trade:
GWS- Lobb
Pies- Bobby
Freo - pick 27 + Cox
Make it happen.
I don't think we'd be getting bent over. Hill for 27 would be excellent value and Cox has no trade value.This would do it for me. I think we're giving up the most, but don't desparately need either of Cox or pick 27, so its enticing for the other clubs.
But alas, we always end up getting bent over a little so we could tinker with it a bit too, does anyone need a JT?
GWS - Lobb, JT
Pies - Bobby, pick 69
Freo - pick 27, Cox
I don't think we'd be getting bent over. Hill for 27 would be excellent value and Cox has no trade value.
Maybe Freo pays part of Lobbs salary to even it up and make it worthwhile for GWS?I think that is a win of sorts to all parties but Freo the main winner.
Hill is the exact type of player we need. Electric speed and puts in multiple efforts. Perfect transition player from half back or great pressure player as a half forward. Yes Please.
I would do that trade as overall we do benefit.
I think GWS would be a bigger stumbling block. Why would they trade a contracted Hill for Lobb. With a significant age gap, they'd have to rate the two very differently to most of us.A further two issues. Fremantle may not have the list space to take on both Cox and 27 plus we’d then definitely need to find a state league ruck option. Zero chance of happening.
I think GWS would be a bigger stumbling block. Why would they trade a contracted Hill for Lobb. With a significant age gap, they'd have to rate the two very differently to most of us.
The Tyson Stengle craze was fun whilst it lasted, come on down Bobby Hill
Damn!He is Contracted
If that’s why they want 27 then we should take advantage of that and get them to pay up for it.I think they said pick 24.
I’d happily give an earlier pick if we could still land Lipinski and have Daicos points.
Compassionate grounds may see the price drop if he nominated us. Others are chasing though I don’t think Essendon have the picks this year to get it done. Maybe that is why they wanted 27 from us.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I'm not much of a Lobb fan, but in the short term I agree with you. It's the 7 year age gap and the potential that would annoy me if I was a GWS fan.Lobb>Hill
Hill wants to leave whilst they’re targeting Lobb I don’t think they can complain.I'm not much of a Lobb fan, but in the short term I agree with you. It's the 7 year age gap and the potential that would annoy me if I was a GWS fan.
Tbh I think they’d be happy enough with 27 alone and Lobbs salary off their books.A further two issues. Fremantle may not have the list space to take on both Cox and 27 plus we’d then definitely need to find a state league ruck option. Zero chance of happening.
Lots of pointless discussion about whether Norths will select Nick at No 1.What are your predictions for week two of the trade period?