They're like magpies taking to shiny things in their analysis.
North concede the most points per game = backline must be bad, end of.
No consideration for the factors up-field, for the woeful levels of defensive effort provided by 5/6 forwards (and sometimes 6/6), by Powell, Stephens, Fisher, Ford, by lacklustre LDU efforts as a result of the enormous burden he bears in trying to hold the midfield together both ways, by our lack of speed, by opposition scoring chains arising from stupid turnovers that an all-time backline would be helpless to stop.
I reckon, pound for pound, we praised defenders on here more than anyone else. Corr got a few nods, Archer and Chom got unanimous nods, LMac's thread was quiet for about seven or eight weeks (meaning he was doing a decent job), ditto for Tucker (for most of the year, in fairness). What other position had that many winners/good contributors?
Literally nothing stopping your average Bigfooty nuffie from providing more insightful analysis than these cretins. It's enough to make you laugh bitterly
North concede the most points per game = backline must be bad, end of.
No consideration for the factors up-field, for the woeful levels of defensive effort provided by 5/6 forwards (and sometimes 6/6), by Powell, Stephens, Fisher, Ford, by lacklustre LDU efforts as a result of the enormous burden he bears in trying to hold the midfield together both ways, by our lack of speed, by opposition scoring chains arising from stupid turnovers that an all-time backline would be helpless to stop.
I reckon, pound for pound, we praised defenders on here more than anyone else. Corr got a few nods, Archer and Chom got unanimous nods, LMac's thread was quiet for about seven or eight weeks (meaning he was doing a decent job), ditto for Tucker (for most of the year, in fairness). What other position had that many winners/good contributors?
Literally nothing stopping your average Bigfooty nuffie from providing more insightful analysis than these cretins. It's enough to make you laugh bitterly