Nerd. You sound like great fun. Whats your idea of a fun time? Box of saos and a bottle of sparkling water?Nothing to hide? Obey the law and have the test. Simple really.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Nerd. You sound like great fun. Whats your idea of a fun time? Box of saos and a bottle of sparkling water?Nothing to hide? Obey the law and have the test. Simple really.
So someone is involved in an accident where a person is killed - you defend his right to refuse being tested for drugs and alcohol, understanding that the on the spot tests are not comprehensive. Is that what you are saying?Nerd
Im saying, IF he didn’t do anything wrong and it was an unfortunate accident. He past tests, then it just appears an abuse of power to attempt to “put someone away”. The blood test should be handled by his lawyer and not the police. If they found culpability then the lawyer can release the resultsSo someone is involved in an accident where a person is killed - you defend his right to refuse being tested for drugs and alcohol, understanding that the on the spot tests are not comprehensive. Is that what you are saying?
He passes indicative tests that indicate some basic drugs - not comprehensive. FFS - I'm staggered you think he shouldn't have to undertake a simple blood test to ensure he was or wasn't fit to be driving. His lawyer? Possible the funniest thing I have ever read on BF. You don't trust the cops and the doctors of the health system, but you would trust his own lawyer? I'm gobsmacked. By the way you say IF he didn't do anything wrong. Without comprehensive blood tests we don't know that. He may have had some illegal drugs in his system. That is illegal and wrong and, if so, he shouldn't have been on the road. That makes him culpable in some way despite the fact he may not have directly caused the accident. You drive with drugs in your system then you break the law and are responsible for any outcomes. Not negotiable.Im saying, IF he didn’t do anything wrong and it was an unfortunate accident. He past tests, then it just appears an abuse of power to attempt to “put someone away”. The blood test should be handled by his lawyer and not the police. If they found culpability then the lawyer can release the results
Thank you. Completely missed the boat on this one.Good young key defender whose main job is actually to defend, unlike those named. You don't hear about him cos Freo
Thank ****207K views · 964 reactions | Broadcast deal | Breaking down how the new AFL broadcast deal will affect your viewing. | By SEN 1116 | Facebook
Breaking down how the new AFL broadcast deal will affect your viewing.www.facebook.com
Four tall forwards and Luke Jackson...
The nostalgia! I wish it was still shown on TV!idky the government ditched the “stop, look, listen, think” I used to sing it as a kid and still gets stuck in my head now lol
They also need to show more road safety campaign videos, today I watched in my rear view mirror a guy in a small truck leaning on his steering wheel typing on his phone with 2 hands while merging on the freeway!! So fking stupid
What if its not illegal cos you have a medical prescription?What happens if you take an illegal drug like cannabis a week ago, you’re no longer under the influence, but it shows up in the blood test after an accident. Would you automatically be at fault?
Spoken like an ex-cop.Spoken like a true white male boomer
He's good.Who is Josh Draper? What have I missed here.
There is no evidence to accurately determine a relationship between blood thc concentration and impairment while driving. Last time I checked (2 years ago) legal "impairment" levels were randomly determined tho there is an association between higher blood concentrations and potential impairment that hasn't been properly determined.No. They determine impairment.
If the drugs/alcohol in your system is less than a certain level so as not to impair you, it’s ok.
But I think it’s a blood test that determines that
Ultimately I think the family deserve to know all the full relevant facts of how he died. Inevitably the driver of the vehicle responsible is gonna need to be properly tested for that purpose. I imagine its about providing some closure, not for building a criminal case over some very small traces.I know its a bit unreasonable bringing this up after someone died but there is no scientifically accurate basis for any impairment test for cannabis, but it can still show up on saliva and blood tests a week or longer after use.
Like where?No worries. If you live in a society where you don't trust the people who uphold the law then fair enough. Why stay here then? Go somewhere else.
He's a gun.Good young key defender whose main job is actually to defend, unlike those named. You don't hear about him cos Freo
Spoken like an ex-cop.
Press Red for Turn off the Tossers.Are they bringing back just the crowd noise without the commentators. That was great when Fox Footy had that.
Have you seen that TV series, "Scales of Justice"? It's on Youtube (it was at some stage anyway).Like where?
Police corruption is a problem everywhere on earth.
If I was getting paid a shit wage on a shit roster to be the first responder to domestic violence call-outs, I’d want some perks for my trouble too.Have you seen that TV series, "Scales of Justice"? It's on Youtube (it was at some stage anyway).
I used to share a house (allegedly) with a cop. Him and his mates would always wear the discount suit when they went to Billy Guyetts or Retravision to buy stuff like TVs and VCRs etc.
Even fish n chips or pizza or a packet of **** down at the corner shop.
Do they show norths away games on 7 in Victoria?I actually think that’s a bit shit that there’s no FTA games on Saturdays from next year. Too bad for people who don’t have / can’t afford Fox / Kayo and want to watch a game of footy on a Saturday night.
It's been obvious, for quite some time, that the interests of those who run the AFL doesn't align with the interests of supportersI actually think that’s a bit shit that there’s no FTA games on Saturdays from next year. Too bad for people who don’t have / can’t afford Fox / Kayo and want to watch a game of footy on a Saturday night.
Is that so?I actually think that’s a bit shit that there’s no FTA games on Saturdays from next year. Too bad for people who don’t have / can’t afford Fox / Kayo and want to watch a game of footy on a Saturday night.