*Mount by many points? 33 scoring shots to 16 - should have done more damage on the scoreboard. But didn't. Bad kicking is bad football.
*Bocco a lot better than I thought. Bulleen underperformed. Solid win that still gives them a sniff of the 5 - a very, very faint sniff. Still unlikely and if they do sneak in they won't cause too much trouble.
*WB up by 156 points, which is more than 114 points. 15 goals to 1 opening term - ouch.
*I don't know why I persist with the Sharks - I'm not a supporter, my cousin doesn't play for them, I haven't even 'been in the area so I thought I'd have a look'. I was nearly 8 goals off the margin there! AP are coming good as we look towards the business end.
*SFX won by 77 points - predicted margin 81. Almost got that one right. The Saints back in town after a Collingwood-esque June slump.
*Centrals did a lot better than I thought they would. What's your rating on Kew, BigWaz / Lakey? 6.9 to 2.2 in the third looks to have done the real damage.
Can't report on the seniors much, but for the ressies Kew are by far the second best team we have played, with a very good midfield, and well disciplined. The difference was really their forwards who took control when needed. Big No 9 and Small 17...very opportunistic. On saturday I called them cheap goals, but really he took advantage of our slack play and good on him. Stopable though. Looking forward to our next clash though.
One last thing:
Good club, awesome facilities, good blokes but..........WHAT THE HELL HAVE YOU DONE TO THE JUMPER? THIS MUST GO DOWN AS ONE OF THOSE "WHAT WHERE YOU THINKING" MOMENTS. HONESTLY, IT IS A DISGRACE AND SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ALLOWED BY THE VAFA OR ANY OTHER AUTHORITY. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE GET RID OF THEM AND YOU CAN BORROW SOME OF OURS UNTIL YOU GET DECENT REPLACEMENTS. THEY ARE AS BAD AS RICHMONDS OLD JUMPERS THAT THEY WORE AGAINST CARLTON ON SATURDAY. BOTH CLUBS NEED A GOOD TALKING TO.
Anyway, I hope I got my point accross......