- Jul 15, 2022
- 2,382
- 2,356
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #176
That one had a slinging motion in it.
The one that he tackled a player like Daicos.
Look we get it the AFL have made it clear the rules are different for finals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That one had a slinging motion in it.
Would be pretty unlucky for anyone to be suspended in finals now. The narrative is it would be unfair for them to miss such important games.
Got to laugh at a Sydney supporter jumping on the Vic bias bandwagon.it will happen...to an interstate club vs an AFL vic club lovechild.
it will happen...to an interstate club vs an AFL vic club lovechild.
There's 2 games in prelim week with just as much media as when there's 9 games. That Daicos tackle just isn't getting talked about at any other time of the year. You've been sucked in by the media finals hype to think that there was any possibility of it being a suspension.The one that he tackled a player like Daicos.
Look we get it the AFL have made it clear the rules are different for finals.
Either way, it's GF so players just get off....
There's 2 games in prelim week with just as much media as when there's 9 games. That Daicos tackle just isn't getting talked about at any other time of the year. You've been sucked in by the media finals hype to think that there was any possibility of it being a suspension.
Jordan Boyd got 3 weeks for driving a player forward, head hitting the ground....That one had a slinging motion in it.
Yep the MRO look at it and dismiss it and there is **** all media scrutiny because it was a standard tackle from behind. But it's finals and a star player so the AFL shows run a segment on it and some nuffies become convinced that he should have been suspended.You're not serious are you?
Player driven head first into the ground and goes off for concussion test. Always going to be scrutinized. The fact it didn't get a free is just as bad but we all saw the umpiring.
Yep the MRO look at it and dismiss it and there is * all media scrutiny because it was a standard tackle from behind. But it's finals and a star player so the AFL shows run a segment on it and some nuffies become convinced that he should have been suspended.
Yeah then he took a shit in his locker and stole his lunch money too. Flog of a humanIf you look at pendles he chicken wings him trying to pop the shoulder to
Why were there no sandy vaginas last year when we lost a prelim by a point. The umps miss the Vic bias memo then?Got to laugh at a Sydney supporter jumping on the Vic bias bandwagon.
Mick Malthouse as well.Nathan Buckley on SEN has stated that Collingwood got the run of the green Friday night.
Spewin. The amount of frees is always the definite answer tooYou mean this one? The one where the Vic team were given 20 free kicks?
You're not making the point you think you're making.
View attachment 1812991
Run?Nathan Buckley on SEN has stated that Collingwood got the run of the green Friday night.
Run?
Conspiracy theorists everywhere.Why were there no sandy vaginas last year when we lost a prelim by a point. The umps miss the Vic bias memo then?
We ate some dodgy spinach.Run?
I guess not. What am i hiding from?Sorry rub of the green. Guess you can’t hide from it.
OMG. Stop the presses. A team might have gotten a bit lucky with some umpring decisions. That has never happened before. This is undoubtedly the work of an evil overlord rigging a Collingwood Premiership.Nathan Buckley on SEN has stated that Collingwood got the run of the green Friday night.
Only noticed it because anchors would have got a week for that to they have before!Yeah then he took a s**t in his locker and stole his lunch money too. Flog of a human