- Nov 22, 2014
- 1,052
- 1,619
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Sure, don't have an issue with that. But he didn't get concussed, so not sure why a suspension is required.Yes, if Hawthorn player is concussed it would have been 4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, don't have an issue with that. But he didn't get concussed, so not sure why a suspension is required.Yes, if Hawthorn player is concussed it would have been 4.
Sure, don't have an issue with that. But he didn't get concussed, so not sure why a suspension is required.
Thanks. That's what I assumed was the rationale behind the suspension, but I was surprised by a lot of people suggesting that Rohan should have got more than Day, which I found strange when Day's tackle ended with a head hitting the ground and Rohan's didn't.Because no one wants tackles like rohans in the game, ie where there is a high probability of concussing a player. Starting with a suspension for the action and then escalating the penalty relative to the outcome of the action makes perfect sense.
That one was egregious.the same way McAdam got more weeks that Pickett
Because it was a sling tackle, clearly a dangerous action.Hard to hear at the ground and Jiath was clearly attempting to play on so I can see why Rohan tried to stop him. Not really concerned about the free or 50 now, but still confused why Rohan was suspended for what I thought was a safe tackle. Happy for someone to enlighten me.
I'd get your eyes and ears checked if I were you.Hard to hear at the ground and Jiath was clearly attempting to play on so I can see why Rohan tried to stop him. Not really concerned about the free or 50 now, but still confused why Rohan was suspended for what I thought was a safe tackle. Happy for someone to enlighten me.
It’s a ploy and one Richmond used in 17 with Grigg (geelongs assistant) to outnumber the oppo at ground level. Creating a 4 on 3.
I suppose we'd all love to see the honest medical report submitted by the Handbaggers.I’m dumbfounded how MRO decides which one is medium impact & which is high impact?
Reckon because the tribunal can in exceptional circumstances give more weeksCats have (sensibly) now accepted the 1 week.
Reckon because the tribunal can in exceptional circumstances give more weeks
In other words - pull out so we can cover our arsesThey may have given a heads-up that they would push for a High severity as a way of ensuring Day cant use Rohan's tackle as a way of getting a downgrade.