The Finger
Premiership Player
- Banned
- #76
Agree. Daisy is gone and it may be to late for Ed to save him. What should of happened is that Ed should have protested when an incident didnt involve his club.
-
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Daisy in trouble ?
- Thread starter Blues_Man
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Agree. Daisy is gone and it may be to late for Ed to save him. What should of happened is that Ed should have protested when an incident didnt involve his club.
KissmeRobbo
Premiership Player
- Jun 26, 2011
- 3,726
- 98
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #77
Grassy knoll stuff guys 
mike14
Premium Platinum
Essendon Player Sponsor 2024 - Archie Perkins and Nic Martin
Veteran
Essendon Player Sponsor 2023 - Archie Perkins and Nic Martin
Essendon Player Sponsor 2022 - Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti and Archie Perkins
Essendon Player Sponsor 2021 - Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti and Archie Perkins
Essendon Player Sponsor 2020 - Orazio Fantasia, Anthony McDonald Tipungwuti, Shaun McKernan
Essendon Player Sponsor 2019 - Orazio Fantasia, Anthony McDonald Tipungwuti, Shaun McKernan
Essendon Player Sponsor 2018 - Colyer, Fantasia, McDonald-Tipungwuti and McKernan
Grassy knoll stuff guys
Are you implying that a 2nd, unknown 'bumper' appeared and laid the bump, and that Daisy is actually innocent?
Didn't see it. Any footage???
the ridiculous decision to contest the charge against clinton jones earlier in the year has come back to bite the pies and thomas as my understanding is the final ban there influences the carry over points? was hard to believe they contested at the time, the consequences are even more dire now. thomas won't play again until the prelim, so added to shaw and maxwell the balancing act re underdone players is going to be even more delicate for the pies coaching staff
ok, seen it. He's definitely in a bit of strife. Flat out bump, front on, jumped and got him head-high.
Minimum 2 weeks you'd think, especially with the 60 odd carry over points and loading
The Falcon Strike
Hall of Famer
No chance of medium impact - will be low impact or not sufficient force
agree. at least 2 before taking into account early guilty plea. just watched a replay of it, i think he is simply lucky ibbotson wasn't more seriously injured. if he'd been concussed and it was classified as high impact his season would be as good as finished
the nick lower incident was also particularly ugly later in the 1st quarter. just watched that again as well, he basically lines thomas up and goes straight for his head as he is bent over. he makes a conscious decision to target the head looki at the vision. should get 5-6, exactly the sort of incident the league wants to stamp out
lynchy magic
Debutant
it was similar to the one McGuane (sp?) got done for earlier in the year. Does any one remember what he got?
This.
Contact to the chest and head, player got straight back up and wasn't attended to by a trainer. There will be no need for a medical report, simply because there won't be one.
Worst case... Reckless/Low impact = 2 weeks with early plea
Best case... Insufficient force to the head to constitute a reportable offence
Most likely case... Negligent/Low impact - 1 week with early plea
Sylvia's was flush contact to the head.
Daisy's was similar to an incident Guerra got cleared for against Leon Davis earlier in the season.
Art Corvelay
Super Chief_
- Oct 4, 2004
- 13,686
- 26,809
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Victory, Pats, Celtics, Ricciardo
Agreed. Was ridiculous at the time, looks even dumber now.
lynchy magic
Debutant
can he plea guilty after already being reported this year? because Hocking couldn't last week otherwise he would have just had a reprimand.
The Falcon Strike
Hall of Famer
Disagree - no chance it will be negligent - the ball had gone and Daisy had jumped in the air - by the tribunal's own booklet - that is reckless.
It'll be 0 weeks or 2 weeks
HyperAgressiveDonk
Cancelled
- Banned
- #92
Should get 2 weeks. Jumped off the ground and made head high front on contact.
But since he plays for Collingwood, he will probably only get 1.
But since he plays for Collingwood, he will probably only get 1.
Could make the finals campaign interesting if the first week or two are Daisy free
- Banned
- #94
There was no difference to the Ben Johnson charge against Port, except it is debatable, whether he hit him high. Johnson got a reprimand.
Fair point, if anything the force of Johnson's bump had the potential to cause greater damage.
If Daisy's gets graded the same, he gets 1 week.
[youtube]9R07ytNj9W0[/youtube]
The Falcon Strike
Hall of Famer
Hocking could have plead guilty last week - it was just that his carryover points meant he still would have copped a week regardless.
- Banned
- #97
imv Johnson's hit touched Banner fair & square high. Comparatively, the Thomas hit is directly to the sternum. There is no medical report & it's debatable whether he hit high.
agree. and i think it will go reckless/possible intentional as he left the ground and went past the ball. will be interesting to see how they assess it.
The Falcon Strike
Hall of Famer
There's a major difference between johnson's and daisy's.
In the johnson scenario the ball was still to be contested and he stayed on the ground.
In the Thomas scenario - ibbotson had the ball and had disposed of it .
Thomas was both late and left the ground.
The severity of Johnson's was worse - but that is irrelevant to the assessment of reckless/negligent
- Banned
- #100
It only matters if both players were going for the ball, in Johnson's case, like Thomas, he had no intention for the ball, the only difference was that Johnson's occured before Gray touched the ball. Thomas after.
