Malibu#27
Premium Platinum
Latest news:
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Replace Port's F2 with Collingwood's F2 and you've got a fair trade there.I had a theory that had Port keeping their F1 but Port fans didn't like it.
Port get
Richards-Lukosius-Pick 13
Port Lose
Houston - F2
Pies get
Houston
Pies Lose
Richards - Noble - F1
GC get
Pies F1 - Noble - Port F2
GC Lose
Lukosius - Pick 13
Port want - Luko and Richards
Coll want Houston
GC want Noble
A three way trade between the clubs can work but only if all parties look through a positive lens.
This. The only club we should be dealing with is North. Why we would even consider making Carlton or Collingwood stronger beggars belief.Deal with North, I know we love Dan but in coming years he is going to hurt us on field. Once he steps outside of Alberton he's the enemy.
Dan is the one that wants to break a contract and head to Malbun so he should go where it suits Port, he never nominated a particular club.
We have to stop looking at him as a Port player, unless he chooses to stay. We have to remember we are making our competitors stronger.
Agreed, if we don't deal with North we will get screwed.This. The only club we should be dealing with is North. Why we would even consider making Carlton or Collingwood stronger beggars belief.
We've done it once last year while paying overs for Soldo, Esava and Sweet.I ****ing hate this club. We throw away future first rounders like candy and then desperately try to trade our way back in for a premium price the year after. It's a joke.
I'm assuming that if we trade Dan, the club getting him pays all of his remaining 3 year wages?Sounds ok
I want a higher first round selection though. Like Richmond are demanding
That’s a great deal for Collingwood. They should lose their current 2nd, instead of our F2 (should even be in there). And both Collingwood 75% and Gold Coast 25% would have to pay Lukos whole salary.I had a theory that had Port keeping their F1 but Port fans didn't like it.
Port get
Richards-Lukosius-Pick 13
Port Lose
Houston - F2
Pies get
Houston
Pies Lose
Richards - Noble - F1
GC get
Pies F1 - Noble - Port F2
GC Lose
Lukosius - Pick 13
Port want - Luko and Richards
Coll want Houston
GC want Noble
A three way trade between the clubs can work but only if all parties look through a positive lens.
Third round - 45 to 60.I hope we wouldn’t do that either.
Richard’s is worth a selection in the 28-38 range at best.
Well put it this way, given Dan has said he is willing to stay and we could probably still get another 3-4 seasons out of him if he does, would you want a 13th pick, a 2nd rounder and a Wylie Buzza-tier player, or your current back to back AA best kick in the AFL?yeah i think i confused myself we need to get something more back for Luko not an F1 straight swap.. In isolation i don't think 13, F2 and Richards for Richards is as bad as everyone is saying.
And F1 for Luko plus a second rounder back, is it pick 23?
Trading away the future = more excuses for Ken's failuresI ****ing hate this club. We throw away future first rounders like candy and then desperately try to trade our way back in for a premium price the year after. It's a joke.
Just a reminder that we would have a pick around 13 anyway if we hadn't done the stupid deals we did last trade period. So the actual sum total is:
OUT: Dan Houston, 1st round pick
IN: Jack Lukosius (talented but flaky), Ivan Soldo (spud, wants out), Esava Ratugolea (spud, we'd be better off if he wanted out), Joe Richards (who?), and maybe some picks in the 20's.
Luko is the only thing we're getting back across those deals worth getting out of bed for, and we're giving up a significantly better player AND a first round pick for the privilege.
LOLI had a theory that had Port keeping their F1 but Port fans didn't like it.
Port get
Richards-Lukosius-Pick 13
Port Lose
Houston - F2
Pies get
Houston
Pies Lose
Richards - Noble - F1
GC get
Pies F1 - Noble - Port F2
GC Lose
Lukosius - Pick 13
Port want - Luko and Richards
Coll want Houston
GC want Noble
A three way trade between the clubs can work but only if all parties look through a positive lens.
We've done it once last year while paying overs for Soldo, Esava and Sweet.
Our previous times trading out a future first have been used in bringing in Charlie Dixon, fed into the Todd Marshall & SPP picks, Georgiades and Jason Horne-Francis.
Yeah poorly spent first rounders there.
And we didn't desperately trade back in after any of those selections. Georgiades we even still picked up Lachie Jones ahead of the future pick we gave up for him.
Sweet is a very good get for 50.We've done it once last year while paying overs for Soldo, Esava and Sweet.
Our previous times trading out a future first have been used in bringing in Charlie Dixon, fed into the Todd Marshall & SPP picks, Georgiades and Jason Horne-Francis.
Yeah poorly spent first rounders there.
And we didn't desperately trade back in after any of those selections. Georgiades we even still picked up Lachie Jones ahead of the future pick we gave up for him.
This needs to be tweeted / facebooked to the world by someone with a decent social media following.Reason 4356 On why the AFL sucks.
Trade Week.
Malbun "Footy Industry Experts" talk shit for 10 days about virtually nothing, over rate Victorian Players, Under rate Non Vic Players, claim to be "in the Know", arbutrary opinions on what a player is worth, their "draft currency", Future Picks, Points blah blah blah blah
Cal Twomey is actually a thing.
Bigfooty Mum's basement types coming up with ridiculous trade scenarios acting like Russel Crowe in A Beautiful Mind.
Its a massive pile of shit.
You've got to keep the Kangaroos on the bat phone at all times because if we deal Houston to them they would've beaten Carlton and Collingwood and basically won the trade period and gotten in a great AA player which they haven't been able to do for a long time IIRC.Deal with North, I know we love Dan but in coming years he is going to hurt us on field. Once he steps outside of Alberton he's the enemy.
Dan is the one that wants to break a contract and head to Malbun so he should go where it suits Port, he never nominated a particular club.
We have to stop looking at him as a Port player, unless he chooses to stay. We have to remember we are making our competitors stronger.
We should just deal with whoever gives us the best deal or nobody at all. Why norf specifically over the others?I get why port are dealing with the three clubs, 3 clubs competing for the one player might give us a better deal. But if these rumoured trade offers don’t improve I will lose all respect for port if they don’t say we are only dealing with North.
North or port Dan, sorry it’s about the club not you
Because nobody has higher picks and ready to offer them up like North?We should just deal with whoever gives us the best deal or nobody at all. Why norf specifically over the others?
We gave up a lot. we swapped 49 with Richmond's 50, and used 50 for Sweet.From memory the Soldo deal wasn't that bad was it?
F1 + F4 + #41 + #49 + #76 + #94 = Soldo + Sweet + Ratugolea |
F1 + F4 + #41 + #76 + #94 = Soldo + Ratugolea |
Do I actually have to answer thisWe should just deal with whoever gives us the best deal or nobody at all. Why norf specifically over the others?