Daniel Kerr- how many weeks?

[Brazen]

I cant believe o ones mentioned the lead up yet that led to Staker getting reported... where West headbutts Kerr... so Staker comes in and remonstrates with West and hits him and gets reported.. then a bit later Kerr returns the favour... unless my eyes deceived me (has happenned before lol)

 

[weagles_fan]

I cant believe o ones mentioned the lead up yet that led to Staker getting reported... where West headbutts Kerr... so Staker comes in and remonstrates with West and hits him and gets reported.. then a bit later Kerr returns the favour... unless my eyes deceived me (has happenned before lol)

I'm pretty sure Staker was reported after Kerr supposedly headbutt West.

 

[ixnay]

Deserves 4. Will get 1 or 2.

 

[Brazen]

I'm pretty sure Staker was reported after Kerr supposedly headbutt West.

Really? I am a bit blurry on the order of things - I thought West came off pretty soon after Kerr left him lying there... from replay I thought comentator said when they were replaying the Staker thing that it was what 'led up to the Kerr incident'... but maybe not - either way it definitely showed footage of West headbutting Kerr, and then Staker remonstrating with West.

 

[larrikin]

Except he did it in the first 5 minutes.

Might have had a fair bit to do with the treatment he got all night.

It wasn't 5 minutes in

 

[plugger47]

Will get zero weeks, nothing in it.

At least six weeks. Where was his Dad? And that thug Staker will go for four. KARMA

 

[Mozza1972]

Karma ...are u joking dude ...a nice king hit ,behind play ,by a serial idiot, if there is a highlight in this very average season for WC supporters it will be that that dumb fcuk Hall wont be around for most of it !!!!!

 

[Juddism]

I don't blame him for doing what he did.
He was "r*ped" all night by the Bulldogs players.
Unfortunately the player retaliating usually get busted.
Probably cop a few weeks coz of past record.

spot on....

____ing appalling the way he was being illegally held through the entire match! I agree with what Voss was saying last-night, needs to be better protection for the midfielders...forwards can't be touched but a midfielder is fair game, fair crack of the whip!

either nothing or 1 week...

 

[plugger47]

Karma ...are u joking dude ...a nice king hit ,behind play ,by a serial idiot, if there is a highlight in this very average season for WC supporters it will be that that dumb fcuk Hall wont be around for most of it !!!!!

And he will be playing in the final series so the highlights will just keep coming.

 

[CAS79]

I think the MRP will give him a couple and WC will go the tribunal and Kerr will win on the fact the footage is poor and we can't really tell what happend.

 

[madcat001]

The differrence between Kerr last night and Ablett Friday night. Disgraceful the way both of them were treated especially off the ball, no wonder Kerr flipped out, we are just lucky Ablett was able to hold his cool.

 

[boydsno1]

I don't blame him for doing what he did.
He was "r*ped" all night by the Bulldogs players.
Unfortunately the player retaliating usually get busted.
Probably cop a few weeks coz of past record.

the reason he was r*ped was because of that incedent. that happened early in the game and he copped what he asked for.

 

[boydsno1]

kerr got tagged as did ablett. geez watch tapes of westy when his up against rawlings or ling and tell me westy doesn't cop worse then what does to did. geez kerr didn't even look like he was trying with the tag. boyd went out and got 20+ posssies if kerr worked hard he could have done the same.

 

[Cousin Jed]

Poor footage? You must be kidding. Clear as day he headbutted him.

 

[Bollox]

Dont tell me Staker has already gone back to belting the little blokes again.

 

[flamethrower]

I don't blame him for doing what he did.
He was "r*ped" all night by the Bulldogs players.
Unfortunately the player retaliating usually get busted.
Probably cop a few weeks coz of past record.

That was payback for what he did to Westy...it happened in the first few minutes of the game.

There is excellent HD vision of the incident from the camera behind the goals at the Coventry end, and doesn't look good for Kerr.
He will get 4 weeks minimum.

 

[scooter600x]

It wasn't 5 minutes in

Sorry, it was 9 minutes in.

At least he won't have to worry about getting a hard time from an opponent for a month.

 

[plugger47]

Dont tell me Staker has already gone back to belting the little blokes again.

His fight record is 2 wins and one loss (KO). His wins have been when he has fought down three divisions. Champ.

 

[Messenger]

Some better quality footage (or magnified existing footage) has emerged and I think Kerr now has a problem.

Well behind play, head contact (moderate), reckless. What does that add to?

 

[BrisGirl]

I thought Goodes was fairly damned on his footage on him elbowing someone in the face at the start of the season, and he got off.

Wouldn't be surprised if Kerr is given the same treatment.

Personally, I thought Goodes should have gone and same goes for Kerr, but the tribunal is a funny animal.

 

[beyondthevalley ofthedogs]

Head butt behind play. Gutless act which should get 4-6. How many will he get? A lottery.

 

[The Big League]

nothing in it, justa collision, west had no awareness like x clarke.

I think only this bloke is equipped to defend something like that:

 

[Juddism]

Head butt behind play. Gutless act which should get 4-6. How many will he get? A lottery.

so its ok to continually block, knock, hold & do every other shitty thing to a midfielder 50m off the ball? West copped it because he was not allowing Kerr to play the ____ing game even when he was nowhere near the ball...as was that scrote Boyd who should've got cleaned up too.

 

[Biggie]

Yes I must admit after seeing footage today our little brain fade Kerr will get at least 2.

Stupid stuff Daniel, very stupid.

 

[balldman]

He SHOULD get off but might cop a week or two. Why? Because he's an Eagle and it seems the AFL wants to bumrape us for a few years.

I've looked through the table for categorising an offence & I can't for the life of me see this listed anywhere?