Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * Coroners Inquiry CANCELLED!

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Please type names out in full for those who are not covered by suppression orders.

For those covered by suppression orders, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:


BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR :rolleyes:
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?
 
Last edited:
If GJ was a TV show he jumped the shark several times over this case.

How did what turn out. You claimed he never considered them suspects. Why bug them then.
He would have to consider the FPS at some stage otherwise you couldn't cross them off the list.
But he crossed them off too soon and was then obsessed with the pedos.
Those tapes show they had an evil side. He said it was like evil meets innocence, or similar to that. I don't think he saw evil in the FPS, it was there which makes me wonder why he supports them.
The tapes confirmed that you don't know what happens behind closed doors.
Locking kids outside, wooden spoons, kicking, demeaning, abusing, blaming, that's what's in the tapes and that is fact.
I don't want to bring Jubelin down but he has to have some doubt, even a tiny bit, after the tapes came out.
 
And do you know the search area? Pretty narrow and close to the FGM property I assume. Why search 3 or 4km away - a 3YO boy couldn't get that far on foot.

Initially the search was 1.5 km around the house.
By Day 4 the search area was expanded to 3 km around the house, then 10 sq km, then by Day 6 it was 20 sq km.


 

Log in to remove this ad.

It certainly wouldn't be typical for the search area to be that large, for a small boy presumed lost in that topography. Certainly not in the first few days.
How far could he get on foot in a few hours? IMO he's going to be travelling at 2kmh at best but much slower in bush, and would be very tired after under an hour at which time he'd give up. So he could never have gotten 2km away from the house.
Even that is a 12 square km search zone - too big to be covered by a handful of dogs.
If you extend it to a 5km radius and assume he was taken in a short car trip and dumped, then we are talking about 78 square kilometres - just impossible to search thoroughly.
 
Initially the search was 1.5 km around the house.
By Day 4 the search area was expanded to 3 km around the house, then 10 sq km, then by Day 6 it was 20 sq km.


Note the difference between distance and area in your measurements. Doubling the distance (radius) quadruples the search area and the resources required.
 
How far could he get on foot in a few hours? IMO he's going to be travelling at 2kmh at best but much slower in bush, and would be very tired after under an hour at which time he'd give up. So he could never have gotten 2km away from the house.
Even that is a 12 square km search zone - too big to be covered by a handful of dogs.
If you extend it to a 5km radius and assume he was taken in a short car trip and dumped, then we are talking about 78 square kilometres - just impossible to search thoroughly.

Without seeing the terrain, but hearing about it, I wouldn’t think that far at all. Especially a 3 year old with asthma, from the inner suburbs, not the bush.
 
They do it in packs. They can remove an adult and drag the pieces back to their den.
Foxes in packs?? A pair and their cubs might be together before the young'uns are old enough to hunt, but basically foxes live separately. You are getting them confused with wolves.
Ok, pairs then. But you can have multiple pairs from different dens in the area. Dens are often full of bones.

Don't ask me the collective noun. I'm still a little dazed dealing with the fact a bush can be slutty 😁.....all the animals just roam and frolic at will......in it, I assume. And the bush willingly, some say eagerly allows them. Ok

Never again will I use the designation of 'virgin bush' without serious hesitation and contemplation......and a nostalgic grin remembering this moment.

Collective noun for foxes is skulk. Somehow that just sounds right in this conversation

A skulk of foxes were roaming and frolicking in the slutty bush. Yes
 
I'm going back to the start.
Why did they leave earlier than planned?
Why did they not inform the FGM until they were on their way? Or ask if that was ok?
Did they have to notify anyone about the kids to let them know their plans changed?
Or were they in some sort of rush to get out of Sydney or be in Kendall earlier?
 
"Where did William Go?" - "He went to look for Daddy's car!"
"How do you know that?" - "Um, I don't know".

The "I don't know" response from children is very common and doesn't always mean they don't know. It's often a way of avoiding answering questions they don't want to answer. Gives them an easy way out.

The thing with foster kids also is that they may not feel comfortable around police. In most cases it's a uniformed police officer who escorted them away from their real parents and siblings, and placed them into a care situation. It's authorities like magistrates who make judgements keeping them away from their bio families. Many of them come from a difficult domestic background where their families may not have had a good relationship with police and authorities in general. So it's unlikely that they are going to instantly open up and be completely open and honest with an interviewer. Even if the interviewer is showing them kindness, and they are coming from a bad situation, these kids don't give their trust easily to anyone. The "I don't know" answer is often just an automatic response to questions from strangers or authority figures.
Didn’t one of the police take the family tovDiamond Head to talk to William’s sister while they investigated the owner of 48 B Drive?
 
I'm going back to the start.
Why did they leave earlier than planned?
Why did they not inform the FGM until they were on their way? Or ask if that was ok?
Did they have to notify anyone about the kids to let them know their plans changed?
Or were they in some sort of rush to get out of Sydney or be in Kendall earlier?
Yes good questions. I’ve asked this myself.
If FFamily had left Friday morning the situation might be different.
Coincidence or not?
 
What time was Peter on BCR? Seems a very simple basic question. Surely he passed the Tennis Club CCTV?
Surely between himself and Michelle they would have some idea of time? Was his phone on and pinging? Did he call anyone? Purchase anything? SFR have had years to check this out. What was the time????
Hang on why can’t Michelle tell them? Is every one suffering PTS?
 
I'm going back to the start.
Why did they leave earlier than planned?
Why did they not inform the FGM until they were on their way? Or ask if that was ok?
Did they have to notify anyone about the kids to let them know their plans changed?
Or were they in some sort of rush to get out of Sydney or be in Kendall earlier?
Agree. It does seem rushed, and for no real reason. Especially since the FF already had a call booked for reasonably early the next morning. With the dodgy internet coverage at FGMs house, why not leave Syd after that call on the Friday a.m. when the peak hour traffic had ended? No need to worry about booking the cats anywhere either. If I also recall correctly, the FGM was/had been unwell and probably wouldn't have welcomed the early arrival and only being informed when the FPs were already on route.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yes good questions. I’ve asked this myself.
If FFamily had left Friday morning the situation might be different.
Coincidence or not?
I think it would have been different.
For one, FF would not have left to go do a work call the next day (Saturday).
The FM wouldn't have had to look after the kids by herself with her mum watching/judging.
 
Hang on why can’t Michelle tell them? Is every one suffering PTS?
Deputy coroner has an aversion to asking questions of witnesses. Would rather make everyone sit for hours watching videos of other people asking questions and then telling everyone what there is no evidence of.
 
Anything to do with William’s sister and what she saw would be dealt with in Closed Court at the inquest; if at all.

We wouldn’t be privy to it, and neither would the media.
Amen to that! Poor kid she has gone through enough she does not need everyone discussing what she did and did not see or do especially friends.
 
How far could he get on foot in a few hours? IMO he's going to be travelling at 2kmh at best but much slower in bush, and would be very tired after under an hour at which time he'd give up. So he could never have gotten 2km away from the house.
Even that is a 12 square km search zone - too big to be covered by a handful of dogs.
If you extend it to a 5km radius and assume he was taken in a short car trip and dumped, then we are talking about 78 square kilometres - just impossible to search thoroughly.
Paraphrased, probably paywalled for some

The forensic search in 2018 covered a 3km radius & went for 4 weeks

It was thorough. Covered every inch of a 3sqkm area from 48 Benaroon Drive.

Search dogs & police officers were fitted with GPS devices to meticulously map the ground covered.

This was spoken about at the inquest, with maps shown etc.




Published 29 June 2018

Search teams and cadaver dogs will now return to the main, larger search area near William's grandmother's home from where the toddler disappeared in September 2014.





Maps in link , paywalled.
 
I think it would have been different.
For one, FF would not have left to go do a work call the next day (Saturday).
The FM wouldn't have had to look after the kids by herself with her mum watching/judging.
Yes of course, but does seem strange, the sudden rush to be there on Thursday when FF had work to do Friday morning and notifying FGM on the way up instead of arranging it with FGM first.
 
Paraphrased, probably paywalled for some

The forensic search in 2018 covered a 3km radius & went for 4 weeks

It was thorough. Covered every inch of a 3sqkm area from 48 Benaroon Drive.

Search dogs & police officers were fitted with GPS devices to meticulously map the ground covered.

This was spoken about at the inquest, with maps shown etc.




Published 29 June 2018

Search teams and cadaver dogs will now return to the main, larger search area near William's grandmother's home from where the toddler disappeared in September 2014.





Maps in link , paywalled.

A 3km radius seems more than adequate to locate a small 3YO boy with asthma on foot.
If he got there on his own steam they would have found him.

But in a car he could have been moved well outside this radius in a matter of minutes.

And then he would never be found.
 
I imagine that as it gets darker and your foster kids bedtime passes and he hasn’t been found yet, that you could quite easily experience a panic attack.
I am wondering if the FM actually remembered enough to tell FF all of the things she had forgotten? Wonder if FF had a vision of William at the house?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top