Autopsy Dogs into prelim - beat Brissy

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dogs 13 said:
Gerard W "there was some exaggerated celebration in all of that" !!

For God's sake he's just put us in front in a cut-throat tense semi final, who'd have thought he'd be so pumped.
Click to expand...

The other thing - i might be late to the party...but Luke Darcy says "kicked the Dogs into a Grand Final" - you can take the boy out of the Bulldogs....
 
grassman75 said:
The other thing - i might be late to the party...but Luke Darcy says "kicked the Dogs into a Grand Final" - you can take the boy out of the Bulldogs....
Click to expand...

He said "Bailey Smith, has he got the Dogs into a prelim final".
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Dogs 13 said:
He said "Bailey Smith, has he got the Dogs into a prelim final".
Click to expand...

Just listened to it again - must be like that Yanny & Laurel thing from last year.

I didn't hear it during the game, only when i listened just before, then i've just re listened and it says Prelim...tricked me
 
grassman75 said:
Just listened to it again - must be like that Yanny & Laurel thing from last year.

I didn't hear it during the game, only when i listened just before, then i've just re listened and it says Prelim...tricked me
Click to expand...

It was a bit too exciting to take in what he said at the time, my squealing drowned him out.
 
meshe1969 said:
Brisbane v Western Bulldogs
10 Jack Macrae (WB)
8 Bailey Smith (WB)
5 Hugh McCluggage (BL)
3 Caleb Daniel (WB)
2 Marcus Bontempelli (WB)
1 Tom Liberatore (WB)
1 Charlie Cameron (BL)
Click to expand...

Daniel 10 Votes for mines. His skills by hand and foot and his decision making and speed at which he did it under pressure is second to none. Even that last kick around the corner. His brain operates on a different plane.

Port will sacrifice an attacking forward to tag him of that I am certain (which lets Dale off the leash). Is there any other defender that gets tagged?
 
Doggy said:
Like this?

He's pissed off Neale is leaving.

I have also been advised that Briabane will let it happen, it's for family reasons

View attachment 1227867
Click to expand...

Robinson has been diagnosed with ADHD, impulsive, over focusing etc. So based on that alone I would say it wasn’t fake.
 
stefcep said:
Daniel 10 Votes for mines. His skills by hand and foot and his decision making and speed at which he did it under pressure is second to none. Even that last kick around the corner. His brain operates on a different plane.

Port will sacrifice an attacking forward to tag him of that I am certain (which lets Dale off the leash). Is there any other defender that gets tagged?
Click to expand...

Rich. Salem. I am sure there is usually 1 attacking defensive player on each team that is tagged….. except North because Aaron Hall doesn’t hurt you enough to bother.
 
Claudonious said:
The McCarthy free kick in the first gifted them a goal. Gards did not even touch him, perfect spoil.

Caleb deliberate was a joke.

VDM ridden into the ground when kicking the point - free kick warranted, milks 30 seconds (assuming the timekeeper starts the clock again....) game over.

Yes - blocking free in the ruck was soft, but it was there.

Plenty of times the whistle was put away in the last qtr - especially in our forward 50

All this rubbish about our frees is simply dumb.we are hard, disciplined, first to the ball and our tackling and spoiling technique is sound. No coincidence we win the contested ball and free kick count.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Gards had already had hands on the ball so he has first right on the ball. That makes it a contest the right call was play on. Gards had eyes on the ball impact after the event is incidental to the contest
 
meshe1969 said:
Brisbane v Western Bulldogs
10 Jack Macrae (WB)
8 Bailey Smith (WB)
5 Hugh McCluggage (BL)
3 Caleb Daniel (WB)
2 Marcus Bontempelli (WB)
1 Tom Liberatore (WB)
1 Charlie Cameron (BL)
Click to expand...

I reckon Doc Duryea is a bit stiff. Charlie Cameron was on track to kick a dozen I reckon.
 
synchrodogcal said:
after the review had been going a while the commentator (not sure who) mentioned the deviation, then next second the official review came through also mentioning the deviation, exact same words - i texted a mate at the time saying the fix was in! horrible review
Click to expand...
I have not the shadow of a doubt that the reviewers listen to the commentators and have long thought so. The correlation of the exact terminology happens too often to be "great judgement" on the part of either.
 
Dogs 13 said:
Gerard W "there was some exaggerated celebration in all of that" !!

For God's sake he's just put us in front in a cut-throat tense semi final, who'd have thought he'd be so pumped.
Click to expand...
One of them said he should have stopped after the first 30 seconds. The whole performance lasted less than 10 seconds.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

TBOW said:
The difference is Weightman was contacted high, concussed and ruled out of the remainder of the game and subsequently next week also whereas Francis wasn't contacted high, took a dive, lay on the ground dead like a soccer player then jumped up fine a minute later.

How that wasn't a multiple week suspension is one of the most baffling match review calls off the year.
Is it just because the commentators missed it at the time, barely spoke about it afterwards and it got lost in the wash after the game?
Click to expand...
Yes.
 
Dogs_R_Us said:
One of them said he should have stopped after the first 30 seconds. The whole performance lasted less than 10 seconds.
Click to expand...

Montagna, he thought it was 30 seconds but it was actually less than 10 seconds. Sounds like problems in the bedroom ;)
 
Munnez said:
Gards had already had hands on the ball so he has first right on the ball. That makes it a contest the right call was play on. Gards had eyes on the ball impact after the event is incidental to the contest
Click to expand...

This needs to be officially explained by the AFL because the fans aren’t sure and the commentators think it’s a free every time. I remember Daniel doing exactly the same thing as Gardner earlier in year ( can’t remember which game ) and it was called play on and the commentators went off about it. Both times it was defender eyes on ball contact on ball first and incidental contact to player as a follow through. One was a free, one was play on. I just want to know what it is and then acknowledgement from AFL which decision was an error. It’s not hard. It’s not crucifying the umpire to acknowledge a mistake. There were 47 frees on the weekend - some were wrong, most were correct. But there were 168 clangers from the players. Everyone on the ground makes errors. I don’t see a problem with honest appraisal to shut up the bullshit conspiracy and cheating talk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

It was entirely unremarkable.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

People always come with preconceived bias. Many people who support both teams were disappointed by some of the umpiring decisions. But AFL is the hardest game to umpire I know. The umpiring was the usual standard, not great but alright.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...
Your first mistake was to pick Adelaide to barrack for. And we don't call umpires refs. Cheers.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Just an ordinary game. With lots of extra whinging from bored trolls.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...
I'm going to go with you're more likely a troll
 
LittleG said:
People always come with a preconceived bias. Many people who support both teams were disappointed by some of the umpiring decisions. But AFL is the hardest game to umpire I know. The umpiring was the usual standard, not great but alright.
Click to expand...
Thank you. It is a quick game. Scrappy, I'd say. American football is like chess compared to this with the long strategies and short plays. This is definitely a rush and in that, I can see how difficult it would be to umpire. I've really appreciated the half-dozen games available on my TV in Alaska. It's the first time I've seen the Dogs - what a team!

Thank you again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Next Waiting
Opinion Dogs and Horses - The Racing Thread
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
307
Views
10K
King Harold
King Harold
BulldogMuscle
Autopsy Hawks defeat Dogs elimination final.
21 22 23 24 25
Replies
611
Views
31K
Mr. Walker
Mr. Walker
Next Waiting
Opinion The Narrative - Dogs Finals Campaign 2024
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
grassman75
grassman75
_Mike_
Review Dogs 110 thrash Demons 59
12 13 14 15 16
Replies
385
Views
17K
Hoges64
Hoges64
Kermit
MVP Ching Rd 24: Dogs d GWS
Replies
16
Views
604
Fossie 32
Fossie 32
Kermit
MVP Ching Rd 23: Dogs d Roos
Replies
16
Views
511
charcoalchicken
charcoalchicken
Kermit
MVP Ching Rd 22: Crows d Dogs
Replies
8
Views
457
Walsh Bay
Walsh Bay

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top