Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Dogs into prelim - beat Brissy

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dogs 13 said:
Gerard W "there was some exaggerated celebration in all of that" !!

For God's sake he's just put us in front in a cut-throat tense semi final, who'd have thought he'd be so pumped.
Click to expand...

The other thing - i might be late to the party...but Luke Darcy says "kicked the Dogs into a Grand Final" - you can take the boy out of the Bulldogs....
 
grassman75 said:
The other thing - i might be late to the party...but Luke Darcy says "kicked the Dogs into a Grand Final" - you can take the boy out of the Bulldogs....
Click to expand...

He said "Bailey Smith, has he got the Dogs into a prelim final".
 
Dogs 13 said:
He said "Bailey Smith, has he got the Dogs into a prelim final".
Click to expand...

Just listened to it again - must be like that Yanny & Laurel thing from last year.

I didn't hear it during the game, only when i listened just before, then i've just re listened and it says Prelim...tricked me
 
grassman75 said:
Just listened to it again - must be like that Yanny & Laurel thing from last year.

I didn't hear it during the game, only when i listened just before, then i've just re listened and it says Prelim...tricked me
Click to expand...

It was a bit too exciting to take in what he said at the time, my squealing drowned him out.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

meshe1969 said:
Brisbane v Western Bulldogs
10 Jack Macrae (WB)
8 Bailey Smith (WB)
5 Hugh McCluggage (BL)
3 Caleb Daniel (WB)
2 Marcus Bontempelli (WB)
1 Tom Liberatore (WB)
1 Charlie Cameron (BL)
Click to expand...

Daniel 10 Votes for mines. His skills by hand and foot and his decision making and speed at which he did it under pressure is second to none. Even that last kick around the corner. His brain operates on a different plane.

Port will sacrifice an attacking forward to tag him of that I am certain (which lets Dale off the leash). Is there any other defender that gets tagged?
 
Doggy said:
Like this?

He's pissed off Neale is leaving.

I have also been advised that Briabane will let it happen, it's for family reasons

View attachment 1227867
Click to expand...

Robinson has been diagnosed with ADHD, impulsive, over focusing etc. So based on that alone I would say it wasn’t fake.
 
stefcep said:
Daniel 10 Votes for mines. His skills by hand and foot and his decision making and speed at which he did it under pressure is second to none. Even that last kick around the corner. His brain operates on a different plane.

Port will sacrifice an attacking forward to tag him of that I am certain (which lets Dale off the leash). Is there any other defender that gets tagged?
Click to expand...

Rich. Salem. I am sure there is usually 1 attacking defensive player on each team that is tagged….. except North because Aaron Hall doesn’t hurt you enough to bother.
 
Claudonious said:
The McCarthy free kick in the first gifted them a goal. Gards did not even touch him, perfect spoil.

Caleb deliberate was a joke.

VDM ridden into the ground when kicking the point - free kick warranted, milks 30 seconds (assuming the timekeeper starts the clock again....) game over.

Yes - blocking free in the ruck was soft, but it was there.

Plenty of times the whistle was put away in the last qtr - especially in our forward 50

All this rubbish about our frees is simply dumb.we are hard, disciplined, first to the ball and our tackling and spoiling technique is sound. No coincidence we win the contested ball and free kick count.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Gards had already had hands on the ball so he has first right on the ball. That makes it a contest the right call was play on. Gards had eyes on the ball impact after the event is incidental to the contest
 
meshe1969 said:
Brisbane v Western Bulldogs
10 Jack Macrae (WB)
8 Bailey Smith (WB)
5 Hugh McCluggage (BL)
3 Caleb Daniel (WB)
2 Marcus Bontempelli (WB)
1 Tom Liberatore (WB)
1 Charlie Cameron (BL)
Click to expand...

I reckon Doc Duryea is a bit stiff. Charlie Cameron was on track to kick a dozen I reckon.
 
synchrodogcal said:
after the review had been going a while the commentator (not sure who) mentioned the deviation, then next second the official review came through also mentioning the deviation, exact same words - i texted a mate at the time saying the fix was in! horrible review
Click to expand...
I have not the shadow of a doubt that the reviewers listen to the commentators and have long thought so. The correlation of the exact terminology happens too often to be "great judgement" on the part of either.
 
Dogs 13 said:
Gerard W "there was some exaggerated celebration in all of that" !!

For God's sake he's just put us in front in a cut-throat tense semi final, who'd have thought he'd be so pumped.
Click to expand...
One of them said he should have stopped after the first 30 seconds. The whole performance lasted less than 10 seconds.
 
TBOW said:
The difference is Weightman was contacted high, concussed and ruled out of the remainder of the game and subsequently next week also whereas Francis wasn't contacted high, took a dive, lay on the ground dead like a soccer player then jumped up fine a minute later.

How that wasn't a multiple week suspension is one of the most baffling match review calls off the year.
Is it just because the commentators missed it at the time, barely spoke about it afterwards and it got lost in the wash after the game?
Click to expand...
Yes.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Dogs_R_Us said:
One of them said he should have stopped after the first 30 seconds. The whole performance lasted less than 10 seconds.
Click to expand...

Montagna, he thought it was 30 seconds but it was actually less than 10 seconds. Sounds like problems in the bedroom ;)
 
Munnez said:
Gards had already had hands on the ball so he has first right on the ball. That makes it a contest the right call was play on. Gards had eyes on the ball impact after the event is incidental to the contest
Click to expand...

This needs to be officially explained by the AFL because the fans aren’t sure and the commentators think it’s a free every time. I remember Daniel doing exactly the same thing as Gardner earlier in year ( can’t remember which game ) and it was called play on and the commentators went off about it. Both times it was defender eyes on ball contact on ball first and incidental contact to player as a follow through. One was a free, one was play on. I just want to know what it is and then acknowledgement from AFL which decision was an error. It’s not hard. It’s not crucifying the umpire to acknowledge a mistake. There were 47 frees on the weekend - some were wrong, most were correct. But there were 168 clangers from the players. Everyone on the ground makes errors. I don’t see a problem with honest appraisal to shut up the bullshit conspiracy and cheating talk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

It was entirely unremarkable.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

People always come with preconceived bias. Many people who support both teams were disappointed by some of the umpiring decisions. But AFL is the hardest game to umpire I know. The umpiring was the usual standard, not great but alright.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...
Your first mistake was to pick Adelaide to barrack for. And we don't call umpires refs. Cheers.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Just an ordinary game. With lots of extra whinging from bored trolls.
 
akedm said:
I'm new to the game. And what a time to pick up interest - right? That was a movie played out in real life. Amazing!

So I'm looking at the Lions forum and they're saying ump this and ref that. Now I'm really new, like really new. I do not know nuance. And some of the rules seem really silly like I think there was a review on if the other team got their fingers on a kicked ball that goes through the posts then it's no good? If so that's a stupid rule. I mean if the other team deflects an in-flight ball and it still goes through the goalposts, well sucks to be the other team cause it still went through the goalposts. Score! But you see that's nuance; I don't know nuance. Unless someone gets punched in the face I can't really say what's going on (can't punch someone in the face, right?).

So as an observer, I'm asking what was the ump/ref'ing like in this game? Obviously, a Lions fan is going to say they suck and a Dogs is going to say they're great or likely stay silent. These are going to be the same guys that will decide games that Dogs will lose too. So if anyone is really honest out there I'd like to hear it: What did you think of the ref / ump'ing this game?

Thanks.
Click to expand...
I'm going to go with you're more likely a troll
 
LittleG said:
People always come with a preconceived bias. Many people who support both teams were disappointed by some of the umpiring decisions. But AFL is the hardest game to umpire I know. The umpiring was the usual standard, not great but alright.
Click to expand...
Thank you. It is a quick game. Scrappy, I'd say. American football is like chess compared to this with the long strategies and short plays. This is definitely a rush and in that, I can see how difficult it would be to umpire. I've really appreciated the half-dozen games available on my TV in Alaska. It's the first time I've seen the Dogs - what a team!

Thank you again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Sentinel
Autopsy Dogs beat Saints
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
301
Views
13K
Chalky White
Chalky White
bresker
Review Wheres the f$$king cool room Suns beat Dogs in a thriller
8 9 10 11 12
Replies
298
Views
13K
RWnBluey
RWnBluey
_Mike_
Review Dogs 132 def Giants 44
8 9 10 11 12
Replies
294
Views
12K
stefoid
stefoid
_Mike_
Review Dogs 143 def Bombres 50
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
192
Views
7K
4Seasons
4
Bulldog Brent
  • Locked
Game Day Dogs v Dons FNF @ Marvel
11 12 13 14 15
Replies
350
Views
6K
_STREET_
_STREET_
Bulldog Brent
  • Locked
Game Day Dogs v North @ Marvel
25 26 27 28 29
Replies
717
Views
12K
_STREET_
_STREET_
MaxiBont
Autopsy Dogs smash Tigers. 135-56
2 3 4 5
Replies
110
Views
6K
BrisDog
BrisDog

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top