- Mar 14, 2011
- 16,513
- 85,803
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Leeds united, Chicago Bulls
Are you picking there?
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Rumour Draft Rumours 2024 - No rumours allowed
- Thread starter ronpingwins
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Adelaide will get Pick 2.
Hearing its agreed upon. They have got the additional F2 North wanted. Could be the R2 pick West Coast got from Hawthorn.
Hearing its agreed upon. They have got the additional F2 North wanted. Could be the R2 pick West Coast got from Hawthorn.
Comedy Capers
Rookie
Adelaide don't have an F2 to give. Part of the Peatling trade.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
They'll trade F3s for one
Makes sense for West Coast to give the Hawthorn F2 for both of Adelaides F3s.
West Coast would be in a great position to get another first round pick in 2025 by packaging those up and getting up the order.
GWS Goose
Brownlow Medallist
Someone with some academy kids or father sons will do it to accumulate some points
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
No one sensible is giving that for 2 r3s next year.
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Not with the changes to the points table.
Danog
17 19 & 20 - Dynasty
If we go off this year's ladder positions, Sydney could possibly do their F2 (35) and F3 (53) for Adelaide's 3 F3s (40, 41, 50)
Sydney go from having 366 points to 529
Last edited:
- Mar 14, 2011
- 16,513
- 85,803
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Leeds united, Chicago Bulls
stacked father son and academy selections at the top of next years draft.
Someone will.
Who would want to trade an F2 for 2 F3s a year ahead of time? Not as helpful for points as it once was and even then I cant see the benefit to any club doing that trade a year in advance.
100%. Why would westcoast trade down? They have loads of picks next year. Would want to package to trade up if anything.
Trading an F2 for 2 F3s a year in advance just limits flexibility for no real benefit.
F3s arent really worth alot in the new world of bidding. Maybe if it's 3 F3s someone will bite.
The interesting question is if the Crows hold firm do North take the 2 F3s anyway?
If North are taking Tauru at 2 or 4 regardless its still something for nothing. Lets not pretend they have anyone else in mind if they are entertaining that trade.
Or maybe the Roos dont like the optics of the trade at such a low price and think thats worth forgoing the 2 F3s? Or maybe they dont want to take the very minimal risk that Melbourne pick swaps with blues to get tauru?
Intersting times. My gut says the crows can find a way to get it done if they want it. But I just dont know who will give them an F2 for 2 F3s.
If North are taking Tauru at 2 or 4 regardless its still something for nothing. Lets not pretend they have anyone else in mind if they are entertaining that trade.
Or maybe the Roos dont like the optics of the trade at such a low price and think thats worth forgoing the 2 F3s? Or maybe they dont want to take the very minimal risk that Melbourne pick swaps with blues to get tauru?
Intersting times. My gut says the crows can find a way to get it done if they want it. But I just dont know who will give them an F2 for 2 F3s.
We have three F3’s, FWIW
More interesting for me is who the Crows would be trading up for assuming Lalor goes at 1 (which I'm not sold on either).
Yeah maybe someone bites for all 3.
They must have mail that Carlton will take Draper?
KurtNeverDied
Rookie
- Mar 2, 2016
- 46
- 79
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Crows want Jagga apparently.
Could be as simple as having 2 f2’s allows a little more flexibility at the trade table.
Ie north could now package f1 and f2 for a pick this year
KurtNeverDied
Rookie
- Mar 2, 2016
- 46
- 79
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Rich: Lalor
Ade: Jagga
Carl: Draper
North: Taru
Dees: Langford/FOS
Ade: Jagga
Carl: Draper
North: Taru
Dees: Langford/FOS
- May 29, 2013
- 5,450
- 13,708
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Dees fans ...... FOS / Langford / Smillie ??
Tigers fans ...... FOS / Langford / Smillie ??
Tigers fans ...... FOS / Langford / Smillie ??
It worries me that this could be exactly what we are thinking. Otherwise asking Adelaide for their third f3 would probably be a better deal for us.
Feels like a misdirect. If Crows wanted Jagga they could likely stay at 4 and get him. Feels like more of the same for North and Carlton midfields, if he doesn't go at 1, think he's there at 4.
Adelaide lack speed and disposal skill in the midfield, not size. The ball winners are more shovel it out guys. A zippy mid like Jagga who gets it on the inside, moves to the outside and finds a teammate, is exactly what we need. Draper would also be a good fit with his clean hands and speed. With Dawson, and last year's 1sts Curtin and Edwards slated for the midfield - adding Langford would make us very top heavy and cumbersome. Not that our drafting team follow logic and reason with their early picks...
Crows could just give us 2x F3 and move up to 3.
Similar threads
