Recruiting EFC Trade/Draft Talk II with F/A rules in OP - Billings for a fourth rounder the latest rumour

[Resistor]

Hang on, so Port Adelaide pick up Patrick Ryder and all they give us is pick 17, yet we then have to give them another player for it??

Nah but we get pick 20 so it is all good

 

[Killer Power]

I believe the draft picks turn into players.

Righto. Still would back our recruiting team in to get a better player than Kav has turned out to be with those picks. You may see it otherwise with your recruiting team.

 

[LeeARM]

I'd like to know if they'd still be up for trading Butcher, O'Shea or Moore along with pick 17 for someone like Kavanagh or Hardingham.

 

[Killer Power]

Nah but we get pick 20 so it is all good

You do realise that is 2 first rounders for a 27 year old with a potential sanction hanging over his head and has said he doesn't want to play for you next year? Stacks up very well against similar trades in the past (eg. Clark, Jolly).

 

[Killer Power]

I'd like to know if they'd still be up for trading Butcher, O'Shea or Moore along with pick 17 for someone like Kavanagh or Hardingham.

Ummm no.

 

[Resistor]

You do realise that is 2 first rounders for a 27 year old with a potential sanction hanging over his head and has said he doesn't want to play for you next year? Stacks up very well against similar trades in the past (eg. Clark, Jolly).

M8 you are getting two players for pick 17. I don't care what we get, or what has happened to our players or previous trades. That is morally wrong that you are handing over a pick and we hand two players who are combined much better than 17, back to you

 

[Mercuri Rising]

Ummm no.

...keeping in mind that your club has already offered that trade (not with O'Shea, but wither of the other two), without receiving the extra player from us. Are you that desperate to not have Hardingham/Kav?

 

[LeeARM]

Ummm no.

Port are obviously more desperate to get this deal done than you seem to think.

(not with O'Shea, but wither of the other two)

I thought they offered him but I may have got it wrong. Wasn't their a third player offered?

 

[ghostdog]

You do realise that is 2 first rounders for a 27 year old with a potential sanction hanging over his head and has said he doesn't want to play for you next year? Stacks up very well against similar trades in the past (eg. Clark, Jolly).

The fact that he's 27 doesn't bother Kenny. If it did you wouldn't be offering him a 5 year deal. Also, why don't you f*** off.

 

[Killer Power]

M8 you are getting two players for pick 17. I don't care what we get, or what has happened to our players or previous trades. That is morally wrong that you are handing over a pick and we hand two players who are combined much better than 17, back to you

Isn't it what your club gets that matters? It is a solution to get things moving and we take over the potential sanctions risk of 1 to 2 more of your players (to add to Monfries).

 

[Killer Power]

The fact that he's 27 doesn't bother Kenny. If it did you wouldn't be offering him a 5 year deal. Also, why don't you f*** off.

Classy. No probs, leave you to it.

 

[Mercuri Rising]

I thought they offered him but I may have got it wrong. Wasn't their a third player offered?

You may well be right - I thought the club were chasing O'Shea without any luck, but I might not be remembering that correctly.

 

[Resistor]

Isn't it what your club gets that matters? It is a solution to get things moving and we take over the potential sanctions risk of 1 to 2 more of your players (to add to Monfries).

Mate I do not care what supposed sanctions our players are facing. And no it is not what we get that matters at all, that line of thinking would be shallow and of a 5yo at christmas time. It's how it happens that is unjust

 

[Eleven 38]

Do we really need every thread derailed by opposition supporters saying "the clause" or "we'll take some players that might get suspended off your hands" just **** off, it doesn't add to the discussion at all .

 

[fishardansin]

You do realise that is 2 first rounders for a 27 year old with a potential sanction hanging over his head and has said he doesn't want to play for you next year? Stacks up very well against similar trades in the past (eg. Clark, Jolly).

Do you realise that we wont trade him shit talking dickheads. Best ruck/forward in the game. We want pick in top 10 and 17 if you can't convince a good player to come here.

 

[Burzum]

You do realise that is 2 first rounders for a 27 year old with a potential sanction hanging over his head and has said he doesn't want to play for you next year? Stacks up very well against similar trades in the past (eg. Clark, Jolly).

He's also an elite ruckman with two-years remaining on his contract.

 

[table tennis]

He's also an elite ruckman with two-years remaining on his contract.

RIG ...... Is it really you?

 

[Old Campaigner]

I like it how people here are yelling at opposition supporters as if they are literally the guy Port has negotiating with Dodoro.

 

[ghostdog]

I like it how people here are yelling at opposition supporters as if they are literally the guy Port has negotiating with Dodoro.

I like it how some half-arsed Essendon supporters are apologists for the weak rubbish Port is proposing.

 

[BrewSmackerVeiny]

I like it how people here are yelling at opposition supporters as if they are literally the guy Port has negotiating with Dodoro.

This is why this forum is hilarious at this time of year.

 

[ghostdog]

This is why this forum is hilarious at this time of year.

I know. I'm turning rancid. I'm going.

 

[Burzum]

RIG ...... Is it really you?

no

 

[rines]

Ryder is close to losing any support I had left for him. This is madness.

Oh and enjoy Ryder Port.. because I can almost guarantee this will be the last EFC player that is ever traded to you.

 

[Burzum]

I like it how people here are yelling at opposition supporters as if they are literally the guy Port has negotiating with Dodoro.

They're "yelling" at them because of the smug "you'll just have to accept what we offer" attitude that they bring.

 

[Jakksynn]

See the way I see it, we're doing our absolute best to ensure you guys are well compensated for losing Paddy, or at least as well compensated as we can do without harming our own list too badly. But you guys still carry on like we're screwing you?

Getting picks 17 and 21 for losing Paddy and a player surplus to needs for you guys is the absolute best you will get from us. Can someone explain what's wrong with it?