eth-dog
Tier 1 WW Player
Knees are shot.Not Jaegar O'Meara?
Prestia and Heppell would be the new Swan/Pendlebury combination IMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Knees are shot.Not Jaegar O'Meara?
That'll be difficult, considering they've already traded next year's 1st round pick away.Prestia will end up at Melbourne.
I'm sure they are well aware of that and have alternative options in mind.That'll be difficult, considering they've already traded next year's 1st round pick away.
We could still use Curnow just as a CHF. Would complement Daniher better than Weideman. Signs are pointing to Weideman to Dons though.With the recruitment of Langford and to a lesser extent Laverde. Would appear that we don't require that third marking tall incumbent midfielder that Curnow projects to be.
Would also appear that out of the remaining guys for our other pick (assuming we take the left over of Parosh/Curnow) would leave us to select Weidemann at 5.
You read my mind baby.A 28 year old slow, inside midfielder who doesn't add anything that Ben Howlett and Craig Bird don't?
We could still use Curnow just as a CHF. Would complement Daniher better than Weideman. Signs are pointing to Weideman to Dons though.
You proposing a merger?Farren Ray is that midfielder that the others aren't
outside and a bit of factor with marking and ability
We must progress in 2016
Honestly, i don't think there is much that separates Hooker, Hurley and Rance, they offer different defensive options. That said i'd say Hurley is better than Rance, and Hooker is better of the three, in that he is a gun down forward and back.Which of Rance and Hooker is he better than, out of curiosity?
Langford won't be a KPF. He'll be a midfielder or flanker.Langford sounds very similar in style to Curnow (minus the bullocking inside midfielder ability) in terms of roles they play.
Would look more favourably to fill positions in more desperate need of assistance
Langford won't be a KPF. He'll be a midfielder or flanker.
Tom lynch would be my target
Prestia and Heppell would be the new Swan/Pendlebury combination IMO.
Have you looked at them? Curnow is much bigger and stronger. Langford's agility and skill is also more suited to a mid or forward flanker role.So the 191cm Curnow will be a KPF but the 191cm Langford won't be?
Him..
Have you looked at them? Curnow is much bigger and stronger.
Agree to disagree then. I don't think they're the same style.What I'm getting at is they are both similarly stylistic players and ones we probably don't need to double up on. KPP's on the other hand
Mate lynch is a very good endurance runner he would be chf with Daniher ffThat would mean that Daniher would have to play a CHF role which the club has shown a dislike to doing. I agree that Daniher seems better suited to CHV than FF. The club dosagrees
Ask Todd Viney.traded for what?
Mate lynch is a very good endurance runner he would be chf with Daniher ff
So the 191cm Curnow will be a KPF but the 191cm Langford won't be?
Him..