Ex-footballer's crime links to be exposed

[Brewster_]

What does it matter who it is, the BF circus clowns will already have their posts typed.

It'll either be the guy is a dirty lowlife and proof that his club is rotten to the core or

It's all a beat up, he did nothing wrong and anyway its still not as bad as the Eagles.

We're all just waiting for the name to come out to see which side of the fence we'll be posting from.

Ain't it the truth.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

MM????

the candyman

 

[ILuvHoochyMommas]

christina? how did she get mixed up with this?

 

[webbo_83]

The Age article from 2004 is not about the same player being suggested in this thread. The player from The Age article is still playing, and can be seen in Melbourne this weekend (unlike most weekends).

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

I love the outrage from people who don't have any vested interest in the site but are happy to push the speculation to the limit, citing censorship if things are removed. It's not a democracy and the powers that be can remove whatever they please. I am sure there are plenty of other sites you can go to and speculate to your heart's content.

 

[dazzaforgazza]

What does it matter who it is, the BF circus clowns will already have their posts typed.

It'll either be the guy is a dirty lowlife and proof that his club is rotten to the core or

It's all a beat up, he did nothing wrong and anyway its still not as bad as the Eagles.

We're all just waiting for the name to come out to see which side of the fence we'll be posting from.

This could only come from a WC supporter that has spent the better part of the season defending, apologizing and justifying criminal behaviour

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

The Age article from 2004 is not about the same player being suggested in this thread. The player from The Age article is still playing, and can be seen in Melbourne this weekend (unlike most weekends).

I should read the dates when I click on links.

 

[Mad Dog]

I love the outrage from people who don't have any vested interest in the site but are happy to push the speculation to the limit, citing censorship if things are removed. It's not a democracy and the powers that be can remove whatever they please. I am sure there are plenty of other sites you can go to and speculate to your heart's content.

What always impresses me is how many highly credentialed lawyers post on BigFooty.....

 

[ILuvHoochyMommas]

I love the outrage from people who don't have any vested interest in the site but are happy to push the speculation to the limit, citing censorship if things are removed. It's not a democracy and the powers that be can remove whatever they please. I am sure there are plenty of other sites you can go to and speculate to your heart's content.

are you annoyed that the dirty money that bought you your 80's flags is coming back to haunt your footy club?

 

[dazzaforgazza]

I love the outrage from people who don't have any vested interest in the site but are happy to push the speculation to the limit, citing censorship if things are removed. It's not a democracy and the powers that be can remove whatever they please. I am sure there are plenty of other sites you can go to and speculate to your heart's content.

So it's a dicatatorship?

Does that mean you'll be getting some of that AFL sponsorship money?

 

[dazzaforgazza]

What always impresses me is how many highly credentialed lawyers post on BigFooty.....

And we are always impressed with moderators who remain impartial and never ever denigrate those in their charge

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

And we are always impressed with moderators who remain impartial and never ever denigrate those in their charge

As opposed to references to 'jack boots' because you can't have as much fun as you want?

 

[Footylover1]

And we are always impressed with moderators who remain impartial and never ever denigrate those in their charge

Like I have said in another thread somewhere, a lot of Eagles and Swans supporters seem to cop the rough end of the pineapple. But hey, whatever suits their fancy!

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

are you annoyed that the dirty money that bought you your 80's flags is coming back to haunt your footy club?

What are you suggesting ... that a player might be linked to dirty money, therefore the whole club is tarnished? That Elliot in his heydey and major backer Dick Pratt didn't have enough money to put into the club so had to chase underworld money?

No, I'm only annoyed that posters such as yourself have a short shelf life on BigFooty and won't be around long enough to keep us amused with their witty observations.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

So it's a dicatatorship?

Does that mean you'll be getting some of that AFL sponsorship money?

There is no dictatorship on BigFooty. Nobody will be prevented from leaving. Everyone is free to accept the established rules or seek their freedom. We are a peace loving people really .....

 

[Nice Guy Adam]

What always impresses me is how many highly credentialed lawyers post on BigFooty.....

I see your point, but really, no one knows anyone's credentials unless they flat out come out and say "I'm a ____." If we've got respected posters here who are right a certain percentage of the time, then I'll tend to take notice.

 

[dazzaforgazza]

As opposed to references to 'jack boots' because you can't have as much fun as you want?

Well thats like a psychologist accusing his patient of not being objective after he has lost objectivity.. you want to be a mod then leave the insults for the trolls.. otherwise you just come off as a hypocrite

 

[crackers57]

I see your point, but really, no one knows anyone's credentials unless they flat out come out and say "I'm a ____." If we've got respected posters here who are right a certain percentage of the time, then I'll tend to take notice.

That's cos you're such a nice guy, Adam

 

[dazzaforgazza]

There is no dictatorship on BigFooty. Nobody will be prevented from leaving. Everyone is free to accept the established rules or seek their freedom. We are a peace loving people really .....

Yeah with a great sense of humour..

Then again I'm probably being a little harsh expecting a Carlton supporter to have a sense of humour this year

 

[Lucky7]

any danger of getting back to the topic at hand?

 

[ILuvHoochyMommas]

What are you suggesting ... that a player might be linked to dirty money, therefore the whole club is tarnished? That Elliot in his heydey and major backer Dick Pratt didn't have enough money to put into the club so had to chase underworld money?

No, I'm only annoyed that posters such as yourself have a short shelf life on BigFooty and won't be around long enough to keep us amused with their witty observations.

We may have a short shelf life because we cannot stand the trifle you serve us up on here.
But in answer to your question, yes and yes, well a maybe.
Two key players were certainly linked in this regard, and seeing as most of your good players came from WA and the problems they have been having there in recent times, i have put 2 and 2 together, and come up with a window, err... i mean that the blue baggers should be called the blue 'brown paper' baggers.

 

[Mad Dog]

anyway - back on topic....

 

[Juddism]

The Age article from 2004 is not about the same player being suggested in this thread. The player from The Age article is still playing, and can be seen in Melbourne this weekend (unlike most weekends).

have you read today's Age article? take particular note of the words

A FORMER star footballer

 

[Keys]

This could only come from a WC supporter that has spent the better part of the season defending, apologizing and justifying criminal behaviour

Have a look through any thread on player behaviour, regardless of which club he's from. The majority of posters attacking the player will be from opposition clubs and the most posters defending him will be his club.

It has nothing to do with West Coast.

We don't have any criminal behaviour.

 

[passthebottle]

anyway - back on topic....

Thats right now who were we talking about again.