It was almost to be expected when you trade out an uninjured premium isn't it?Im surprised a lot of coaches traded out broughton. What are the thoughts after his high scoring game on the weekend ? It looks as though he played on a wing and got a fair few side on marks late on
I think Fyfe going down along with an underdone midfielder in Mundy playing (+ them coming up against Brisbane who do not really have any dangerous small forwards) allowed Broughton to get that fantasy relevant role which we all picked him for in the first place.
Once Mundy gets his fitness back along with them coming up against some strong teams, I now think Broughton will get that shut down role on other teams dangerous forwards as he has since the start of the season (along with the last in which I held onto him a little while longer last year without winning anything in return for doing so).
Bringing in Lake didn't go quite to plan with him going Matty Scarlett on me but I believe he is every chance to reach a keeper/premium level. So whilst I could have waited a week, I've got more cash in the bank by pulling the trigger when I did as well as not having to worry if Broughton did pull out a decent score like he did as to whether I'd stay or not.
If Fyfe does go under the knife then it might not be too long before Neale comes back into your side!i traded out broughton for the main reason that i was $200 short of going directly from Neale to Greene, as such i had to do a second trade to make that enticing first trade. Broughton under performing and not playing in a role that i was happy with provided me with a good opportunity to do the second trade that i needed.
Don't forget that Broughton was on 25 at half time. His scoring went through the roof once Fyfe got hurt. If Fyfe is to miss significant time then I expect Broughton's scoring to go to elite levels. Unfortunately i did not predict that Fyfe would hurt himself and thus the trade looks like a bad one in hindsight. I still believe that trading Broughton out was a good play to make, it just so happens that a change in circumstance proved to be massively beneficial to Broughton.
Good point you raise with Broughton only being on 25 at half time and Fyfe being subbed off in the 2nd quarter.
Also shows just how high Broughton can score when he's in the right role (83 in a half!).
As much as I'd like to say no, it's basically a 'never say never' sort of thing. Whilst I wouldn't want to jump back on him as his burned me by doing poorly (now the second year running) and there were reasons as to why I traded him out, if those disappeared, I wouldn't let the fact that he has previously burned me get in the way of me trading in who I think is the best target.Would you do the unthinkable and trade him back him? I traded him to Waters and felt pretty vindicated when he was stuck on 25 at half time.
Felt sick in the guts when I saw him smack bang in the middle of Subiaco racking up possessions at will after half time.
People often have rules such as not starting with a player over the age of 30, not trading in a midpriced player etc. While they're normally good rules to avoid as many potential risks as possible, there are always abnormalities and I find each situation has to be treated as it's own.
Having been burned by both Adcock and Dawes last season (two midpriced player I traded in) I'm fairly sure I said I wouldn't trade a midpricer in again. However, when there's something that screams value or tickles my fancy, I'm pretty quick to throw those rules out the window (Lake). Whilst he may very well end up burning me, I prefer to keep as open minded as possible and consider any and every option available.